The "War on Drugs" has killed more Americans than Vietnam. There is evidence that it kills more people every year in the United States than have died in Iraq in three years - or than died on 9/11. Every year.
Most of those deaths come from the violence between dealers and gangs protecting their markets, from dealers killing customers and other dealers, and from addicts who resort to violence to get money to feed their habits.
The "War on Drugs" has sapped more of our civil liberties than any other episode in recent history; the groundwork for easy wiretaps, no-knock warrants, property forfeiture laws and the erosion of the Fourth Amendment was laid during the crack hysteria of the '90s.
As Steve Chapman notes, it doesn't have to be that way:
As it happens, no fewer than 11 states on this side of the border have made the decision not to bother filling their prisons with recreational potheads. Among them are not only states like California and Oregon, which you might expect, but states like North Carolina and Mississippi, which you might not. About 100 million Americans live in places where pot has been decriminalized.Why isn't the media asking questions about this? Posted by Mitch at May 22, 2006 07:05 AM | TrackBackMaybe there are planeloads of college kids who travel to Maine or Minnesota to spend each spring break hitting a bong, but if so, it's a well-kept secret. In fact, the most noticeable thing about states that have decriminalized marijuana is that they're not -- noticeable, that is.
Looking at these places, says University of Maryland economist Peter Reuter, "You can't tell the difference from how many people use marijuana." A 1999 report commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences found "there is little evidence that decriminalization of marijuana use necessarily leads to a substantial increase in marijuana use."
Not everyone is in complete agreement. Rosalie Pacula, codirector of the Drug Policy Research Center at the RAND Corp., a California think tank, says her research indicates decriminalization does tend to lead to higher use. But by her measures, the effect is small.
I've been pondering this all morning. I know your small "L" libertarianism conflicts with your conservatism on issues like this. We generally agree that drug abuse is bad. Defining drug abuse is not as easy as saying "this is illegal, therefore bad" because of the personal choice/only hurting yourself aspect of it. And that's a potentially false argument too. Can we determine that the cost to society under prohibition exceeds that which would surely emerge under legalization? Remember, decriminalization will not eliminate the criminal element of the drug trade.
Posted by: Kermit at May 22, 2006 11:13 AMTo answer your question of why the media isn't asking these questions, my guess is that it's too much work, and the MSM has never impressed me with their collective industriousness.
With certain exceptions, like John Stossel, of course.
There is no more clear-cut example of the idiocy of statism (which, by the way, is NOT the opposite of anarchism) than the War on Drugs. That our blood and treasure which has been expended in Afghanistan is at risk of being lost in vain, due to our obssesion with criminalizing intoxication via vegetable matter "x", instead of vegetable matter "y", is so stupid as to be laughable, if it did not involve the grief for those lost in that theater of war.
Posted by: Will Allen at May 22, 2006 12:04 PMHey, if we legalized drugs and ended the drug war, we could use the money to finance the real war...you know the one against terror that actually deserves the resources.
Posted by: McGruv at May 22, 2006 04:36 PMupskirt teen girls redhead upskirt
Posted by: Fndfvawia at October 9, 2006 12:24 AMebony gonzo free ebony bbw sex
Posted by: Mibenoxm at October 10, 2006 01:24 AMebony gonzo free ebony bbw sex
Posted by: Mibenoxm at October 10, 2006 01:26 AMlesbians in pool sailor moon lesbians
Posted by: Pfnzi at October 10, 2006 12:45 PMlesbians in pool sailor moon lesbians
Posted by: Pfnzi at October 10, 2006 12:46 PM18 porn pocahontas porn
Posted by: Mnpulcneu at October 29, 2006 11:22 PMcsThis is very sadly, but such resource are exists: tight shaved pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/tight-shaved-pussy.html
Posted by: tanita at October 30, 2006 03:37 AMbig dick in pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/big-dick-in-pussy.html
thick black pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/thick-black-pussy.html
old black pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/old-black-pussy.html
massive cocks tight pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/massive-cocks-tight-pussy.html
pussy free|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/pussy-free.html
black juicy pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/black-juicy-pussy.html
pussy shaved|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/pussy-shaved.html
black cock white pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/black-cock-white-pussy.html
teen shaved pussy|http://fdgdfgries.madhunks.com/teen-shaved-pussy.html
simpsons cartoon porn hardcore porn videos
Posted by: Hcaoamlnfty at October 30, 2006 01:30 PM