shotbanner.jpeg

March 24, 2006

Defending Pacifism

I've written this article before. Bear with me.

The story of the "Christian Peacemaking Teams" rescue has shown modern "christian" "pacifism" for what it is - an ideologically and morally bankrupt philosophy.

Pacifism is a fine thing - as long as the pacifist has integrity. Modern "christian" "pacifism" has largely none.

I attend the Presbyterian Church, for purely theological reasons (an alignment that has been and remains sorely tested at times). While the people in the pews at most Presbyterian churches are all over the place, and frequently as conservative as the church's reputation would have you think they were, the Presbyterian Church's General Assembly - the elected body that takes care of the church's temporal governance - is, frankly, insane. And you can see from whence they come if you walk into nearly any Presbyterian (or Lutheran, or Catholic, or Methodist...) church; people who, as P.J. O'Rourke said, have self-righteousness like some people have halitosis; people prone to making grandiloquent pronouncements about world events that are inevitably in line with the model set by the World Council of Churches 30 years ago when it cast its lot with Liberation Theology (to the point of funding religious mission supplies like rockets and explosives for leftist guerilla groups in Latin America).

There's one of those in my congregation; a crotchety septuagenarian who, during open prayers on Sunday morning, inevitably sermonizes: "Pray for the people of North Korea, who are being starved because the US Government won't send food", or for "the people of Darfur, who we are too racist to rescue" (along with prayers for "the people of New Orleans, who are being killed by Administration indifference" and an end to "the genocide of tax cuts"), that sort of thing. No mention, of course, of the stalinist government in Pyongyang or Khartoum that is making it so easy for us to achieve our nefarious ends. Naturally. The woman - like the "Christian" "Peace"making teams - is completely silent about the horrors under the Hussein regime, and was when Hussein was in power (although she prayed fervently for us to drop our sanctions...)

Moral stances are fine; to be moral, they must have integrity. "Pacifists" who only protest against perceived American abuses, and remain silent on those of totalitarian regimes around the world (at least, those of them at odds with the US) have no integrity; they are, indeed, perfect hypocrites.

Posted by Mitch at March 24, 2006 07:14 AM | TrackBack
Comments

How many times need it be said? Pacifism in the face of evil is immoral. Objectively pro-evil, to paraphrase.

Posted by: Patrick at March 24, 2006 07:48 AM

Mitch complained: "There's one of those in my congregation; a crotchety septuagenarian who, during open prayers on Sunday morning, inevitably sermonizes: 'Pray for the people of North Korea...'"

Of course Mitch responds with his own special prayer:


Our President who art in Washington,
W be thy name.
Rove's kingdom come,
Cheney's will be done,
In D.C. as it is in Houston.
Give us this day our daily fib
And forgive us our trespasses,
As we invade those who trespass not against us.
Lead us not into Impeachment,
But deliver us from the Axis of Evil.
For thine are the tax cuts and the spending and the deficits,
Forever and ever.
Amen.

Posted by: angryclown at March 24, 2006 08:08 AM

I can idntify with your experience Mitch. I am in a Lutheran church that is slightly to the left of Mao. I attenf the Adult Ed sissioins and we have some very lively debate, kind of like your comments sectio, except with civility.
They are embarking on a program called ISAIAH, which declares that God has given us abundance and hunger, poverty, etc. are the fault of not enough government. I am doing the Lord's work by injecting the occasional note of sanity.
Why would the seminaries be any different than other universities?

Posted by: Kermit at March 24, 2006 08:08 AM

...to paraphrase Orwell. He knew these people.

Posted by: Max at March 24, 2006 08:09 AM

OK, Mitch, you fooled me. I was thinking Angryclown was a actual person, but you overplayed your hand. You went out and created your own parody of the retarded left stereotype. I think you owe your readers an apology for pulling something like this. Next time, tone it down. It was the over-the-top assholiness that gave the game away.

Posted by: buzz at March 24, 2006 09:57 AM

Nice work Clown (although I'd go with Midland rather than Houston, but that's just me). Frankly I'm impressed that you know the words. I have an alternate version:

Our Clown who art in Gotham,
Angry be thy name.
Kerry's kingdom come,
Dean's will be done,
In D.C. as it is in Ho Chi Minh.
Give us this day our daily glib,
And forgive us our appeasement,
As we appease those who trespass against us.
Lead us not into Sha'ria,
But deliver us from the Evil.
Even though the concepts of Good and Evil are artificial moral constructs that have no place in this nuanced age.
Amen.

Kind of got away from me at the end. Sorry.

Posted by: chriss at March 24, 2006 11:03 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi