shotbanner.jpeg

July 22, 2004

Stabbing John Knox's Corpse

To: The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, USA
From: Mitch Berg, disenfranchised parishioner.
Re: Your continued idiocy.

Dear General Assembly,

My parents left the Lutheran church and joined the Presbyterians when I was probably 11 or 12 or so. I credit some of your clergy - Reverends Bill King, Jim Jacobson and Mick Burns, especially - with helping me grow up not too terribly far in the moral weeds, and into a person I'm not terribly unhappy to be.

When I was in college, I embarked on a bit of a personal quest - to see where I belonged in terms of faith, if anywhere. I examined a lot of different types of faith; I rejected things like Buddhism because it's inherently self-centered and, at its core, nihilistic, and makes no intellectual sense.

Eventually, I wound up back where I started, in the Presbyterian Church. The reasons were purely theological. The core beliefs of the Presbyterian Church are really wonderful, and really cut to the heart, to me, of what being a Christian means. And the original teachings of your founding father, John Knox, had important resonances for what it meant to be an American, too. No reformation theologian better combined the notions of faith, the free will of the citizen, and the place of the state in the life of the person of faith than Knox and the church he founded.

Unfortunately, I think the search took a nasty turn.

Lately, and unfortunately, the Presbyterian Church/USA itself seems to cut, more often than not, at the heart of what it means to be a morally-decrepit idiot.

For example, see this story, about the PCUSA divesting from Israel:

The Presbyterian Church has three million American members and is one of the strongest denominations in the country. This time it did more than issue declarations condemning Israel's occupation of the territories. In a precedent setting decision, it took practical steps to halt investments in Israel, and to discourage contacts with companies that do business in Israel.

Divestment decisions regarding Israel have in the past three years been reached by academic and research bodies in the U.S., but these have mostly been small institutions with limited economic clout. Their calls for divestment have had a marginal economic impact. Now, for the first time, a significant religious entity that controls large sums of money and commands the beliefs of millions of followers has called for the imposition of economic sanctions on Israel.

With this decision, you've joined the German Lutheran congregations that turned a blind eye to the depredations of the Nazis. That you, the General Assembly (the supreme governing body of the Presbyterian Church) could engage in such a wretched recognition of phony moral equivalence is galling; the thought of raising my children in a denomination that equates terrorists with a nation defending itself is hilarious, in a tragically grim way. I won't do it.

You are a democratically-elected body. But I can assure you that the investments you maneuver about the world will include not one dime from me forever more, until you as a governing body rediscover the difference between good and evil. Until you do, you shall have no part in teaching it to my children.

Who will, at this rate, be the next generation of a whole different church. Count on it.

Shalom, my ass.

Posted by Mitch at July 22, 2004 05:31 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Just out of curiosity Mitch, have you decided where you will be going from the Presbyterian Church?

Posted by: Thorley Winston at July 22, 2004 08:27 AM

Mitch - wow. Have you sent them a hard-copy of this? I hope so.

Posted by: red at July 22, 2004 08:47 AM

I'm not a Last Times fanatic. I generally believe in the Second Coming, but don't see the Unmistakable Signs of the Coming Apocalypse that so many of my fellow Christians seem to discern. However...

There is one thing new in our time that (it seems to me) might mark it as the Last Days indeed. That new thing is a general apostasy. We've seen times of great corruption in the church in the past, but never before in history have virtually all the established church bodies abandoned the Faith wholesale. I think most interpreters have seen the Whore of Babylon in the Book of Revelation as an apostate church, and it seems to me the lady may have arrived.

Just an opinion. I don't insist on it.

Posted by: Lars Walker at July 22, 2004 09:33 AM

I've been shamed by statements and actions from my Anglican and Episcopal church leadership in the last few years, but this takes the cake.

I took my feelings to my priest, who said that local churches need not necessarily support the statements or actions of the bishops. For now, that's fine. But I've got a close eye on them. I think we're seeing the elimination of the church as a moral force for society, as it tries to become a political one.

What to do? I'm focusing on the societal outreach of my church and ignoring the fools who "run" it. They'll go away someday. Hopefully the church will still be there when they do.

Posted by: Brian Jones at July 22, 2004 10:37 AM

Mitch, in the spirit of completeness, you should note that the Confessing Church in Nazi Germany was a group of Lutherans who opposed the state. Admittedly, it was a minority of German Christians, but nonetheless I don't think they should all be painted with a single brush. If you haven't seen the PBS special on Dietrich Bonhoeffer ("Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace"), I highly recommend it.

Posted by: kb at July 22, 2004 11:10 AM

Yikes, Mitch, good going. I have been watching my own Catholic Church closely, lately, and I do not contribute to certain "appeals" because of where they send there money. I always prefer to give it directly to my very own parish. I have no plans to leave the Church, but I do differ with some "social justice" issues. This has NOTHING to do with proper dogma, and so far, I am able to keep them apart. Of course, I am blessed to live in a great parish which is careful not to be political.

Way off topic, what happened the the Conceal and Carry thing? I do away for a week and the roof falls in.

Silver

Posted by: Silver at July 22, 2004 12:52 PM

Mitch--

Here's a link where I recount a similar struggle with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=11638#c0151

From there I migrated to the ELCA, where your average congregation (although not including my church in rural Wisconsin) is flirting with such notions as "divesting from Israel," "cultural exchanges with the Palestinians," yatta yatta yatta.

Once the ELCA spends one cent of my money on a Palestinian cause.... I'm going to have to start my own church, I guess.

Well done, sir.

Posted by: Pete (Alois) at July 22, 2004 01:16 PM

A man shipwrecked alone on a deserted island was finally rescued after several years on the island.

When the rescue party landed on the beach, the man invited them up to his living quarters about a quater mile inland so he could gather his meager belongings.

When the rescue party arrived at the small clearing where he lived, they saw three grass huts.

The leader of the party asked the man why he had three huts.

His response: The hut on the left is where I live and the hut on the right is where I go to church.

So the leader asked him about the hut in the middle.

His response: Oh that. That is where I used to go to church.

Posted by: RandMan at July 22, 2004 05:48 PM

Sorry, couldn't resist the opportunity to post the above.

On a much more serious note, this PCUSA situation is just sad and disgusting. What more can one say?

Posted by: RandMan at July 22, 2004 06:01 PM

Thorley: No, I haven't. The problem is, the basic theology of the Presbyterian Church (in general, not just the PCUSA) is so very sound, I hate to turn my back on it. There is no Protestant denomination whose theology just plain makes sense like that of the Presbyterian Church. The problem when you get into politically-conservative denominations is that so many of them flirt with so many things I find theologically unsatisfying (near-exclusive basis on the spirit as opposed to the other legs of the trinity, for example) or just plain dubious (predestination). So there are no easy answers to this question.

Red: I believe I will. Thanks.

Lars: I don't think it's *quite* that bad; I think the majority of Christian churches are still focused on actual worship of the actual God. It's just that the whiffle churches have such high profiles.

Brian: I like that approach. The problem is, you have to really work to find clergy in the PC here in the Twin Cities that aren't pseudo-PC-episcopal caricatures. They CAN be found - I've found several, and gone to their congregations. It just takes work (especially given the PC's policy of moving people around constantly).

Silver: I do the same. As to the MPPA - we're waiting to appeal to a sane judge. My on-air calls for a mob to chase Judge Finley down University Avenue with sticks seems to have gone unheeded.

Pete(Alois): I'm going to have to use this.

Randman: LOL! And what can one do? Well, I've done some moving around, church-wise. I guess it's to the point where I have to fight or switch. I'm more of a fighter. The structure of the Presby church is such that fighting can yield rewards (church operations, as opposed to theology, are very democratic), but I'm not a member of a specific congregation right now. I'm going to have to fix that.

Posted by: mitch at July 23, 2004 07:14 AM

King: I'm aware of the Confessing Church. I was referring directly to the activities of the mainline German Catholic and Lutheran churches, who had an immense moral blind spot when it came to the treatment of the Jews. Goldhagen called it part of the German character of the day; eliminationist anti-semitism was an integral part of of German "Volk" and culture. The case can be made that anti-semitism is part of the left's culture. It'd be hard to distinguish that notion from the PCUSA's decision.

Posted by: mitch at July 23, 2004 08:43 AM

Mitch,

You should check out the Mormon Church: http://www.mormon.org/

Theologically sound, a rock-solid moral anchor, quite conservative on most everything. In addition those who join seem to find something immensely satisfying and seldom leave, hence the rapid growth. If you check it out you'll also find Mormons are not the whacko cult they get credit for being.

Posted by: gitchigumi at July 23, 2004 12:43 PM

Mitch,

You should check out the Mormon Church: http://www.mormon.org/

Theologically sound, a rock-solid moral anchor, quite conservative on most everything. In addition those who join seem to find something immensely satisfying and seldom leave, hence the rapid growth. If you check it out you'll also find Mormons are not the whacko cult they get credit for being.

Posted by: gitchigumi at July 23, 2004 12:43 PM

Thank God I'd already abandoned the Presbyterian church. But then, I almost wish I'd hung around so I could quit over this contemptible decision.

Posted by: Hiawatha Bray at July 23, 2004 02:13 PM

The denomination you choose is a very personal thing. When I lived in the Cities, I loved Church of the Open Door, (which is Alliance Missionary I believe), for the great teaching of Dave Johnson during sermons, (Growing in Graqce if you've heard him on the radio.) But, It's a huge denomination, so it's hard to connnect there on a personal level.

Although I am currently a memeber of the local Baptist church, (GLBC), I consider myself pretty non-denominational. When it comes to choosing where you should be in my opinion, it's a question you have to ask God. Where do you want me?

Since Christianity's focus is supposed to be Relationship rather than Religion, then the answer to where you should attend needs to come out of that relationship.

Posted by: DC at July 23, 2004 06:31 PM

DC, it's funny you should mention the difficulty of connecting in a large congregation. My church has grown, in the time I've been there, from a church where everybody knew everybody to one where smaller groups of "connected" (to one another) people (what I used to disdain as "cliques") abound. It's impossible in a large group for everybody to connect over everything. Our church has become what my wife & I studiously avoided; now we look with fresh eyes at the "cliques" and realize that unless you're in one, you're not connected to anybody.

Of course, I could be misusing "clique". We connect with the Parents Of School-aged Kids, the Musicians (I'm in the choir and play guitar and piano), the Sharing Carers (Tasha's a natural-born nurturer), etc. etc. etc. We're accepted by Tasha's mother's cliques, and she by ours. So, high school melodramatics aside, I don't think cliques are always a bad thing.

My point? I have no point. Point and clique. I dunno. Don't be skeered of large congregations, I guess, is it.

Posted by: Brian Jones at July 23, 2004 06:40 PM

Pete (Alois):

ELCA!?

I happen to be rather furious with the ELCA these days, well ever since they signed the agreement on full communion with the Episcopalians.

You can read my tirade here: Ecumenicism. I strongly disagree with the way the ELCA bowed to pressure from the Episcopalians and agreed to participate in the consecration of bishops. The ELCA sold it's soul for what I see as nothing more than financial benefits.

Which begs the question Mitch and everyone else must be asking: Where do traditional Christians turn these days?

Posted by: Ann at July 23, 2004 11:27 PM

The link didn't publish. Here it is: http://www.annsbox.com/logger/archive/archi.cgi?read=506

Posted by: Ann at July 23, 2004 11:28 PM

Ann--

Thanks for the link. Wonderful writing. I will need to check you out more often.

All in all, I am very ticked at most of the mainstream Protestant churches. Mitch has just added more ammunition to the fire (as have you).

I will not worship in a church that goes against my quite deeply held spiritual beliefs. Period.

Posted by: Pete (Alois) at July 26, 2004 01:15 PM
hi