There was a time when Americans - at least in stereotype, but then many stereotypes exist because they occur just often enough to be accepted as, well, stereotypes - were a self-reliant people. Of course, the black 'n white liberal representation and mocking of this stereotype as "a bunch of (tee hee) rugged individualists" is inaccurate; frontiersmen and settlers depended on their communities as much as their own pluck and gumption.
But it was a fact of life; before there was an all-seeing, all-knowing bureaucracy to backstop citizens against life's twists and turns and nature's onslaughts, people had to keep a weather eye out, and be ready to fend for themselves if things got rough. It was a matter of life and death.
Along about forty years ago, that started changing.
I think it started about forty years ago - when the chattering classes started tittering at the people who'd built fallout shelters during the fifties and sixties. "Paranoid", they clucked.
In the seventies and eighties, the left worked overtime trying to paint those who opted to defend their homes, families and property with firearms as a fevered aberration, sick and paranoid and worse. It didn't work, of course, outside of a few enclaves on the coast and a few tony left-leaning 'burbs - but they tried.
After the Anthrax scare of a few years ago, FEMA advised people in high-risk areas to think about stockpiling plastic sheeting and duct tape, to build "Safe Rooms" against possible chemical or radiological attack. The chattering classes had a gleeful field day - "Plastic SHEETing! Against a DIRty bomb!" - ignoring the fact that it was indeed a simple measure that, in a pinch, could mean the difference between life and death (in this case a thrashing, horrible death from chemicals, or a slow, painful one from radiation poisoning, or a slower one still from lung cancer caused by aspirating a piece of radioactive material that a piece of plastic and a strip of duct tape could have easily turned away). And as the lefties used to bleat, if one life is saved, isn't it good enough?
Watch for the left to start tittering about Michael Chertoff's interview yesterday with the AP, in which he urged people to...
...prepare.
That was all.
Two months of hurricanes ravaging the Gulf Coast should prove that people need to make preparations so emergency officials can focus on those who are poor, elderly or otherwise can't help themselves, Chertoff said.Here's a good general rule of thumb to follow: if you are listening to someone who titters about this sort of thing, ask them directly; "what do you know about this? How did you learn what you know?""For those people who say, 'Well, I can take care of myself no matter what, I don't have to prepare,' there is an altruistic element — that to the extent that they are a burden on government services, that takes away from what's available to help those who can't help themselves," Chertoff said. "That is a matter of civic virtue."
Chertoff's comments mark a new stage in Homeland Security's "Ready" campaign — which was widely ridiculed two years ago for urging homeowners to stock up on duct tape and plastic sheeting to safeguard their homes against a chemical or biological attack.
If they respond "Well, duh! I mean, plastic sheeting? Jugs of water in the basement? Puh-leeeeeze", then do yourself a favor; Kill them. And their families.
Because if you listen to them, that could very well be what they will do for you and yours.
(DISCLAIMER: The above was intended as hyperbole. This blog DOES NOT ADVOCATE KILLING LEFT WING MORONS. Although I could sold of covert chemical sterilization.
(No, that was also hyperbole, and not to be taken seriously).
Oh, wait - they already are:
But Dr. Vincent Ferrandino, executive director of the National Association of Elementary School Principals, cautioned against using the schools as messenger except "when it's absolutely necessary, and we consider it an issue of national importance."Right. Because goodness knows that the schools don't waste any classroom time with passing on useless, trite effluvia (he says, remembering the day his stepson spent two hours in an assembly to commemorate the life and impact of Selena)."Schools need to be a place where important issues are discussed," Ferrandino said. "But we need to be careful that we don't use the schools constantly for everybody's latest and greatest new idea."
Which brings up an idea for a post - but I'll get back to you all on that.
Whether the public will listen, however, is another matter.It isn't. Gov. Bush is correct.Even with a week's notice of Hurricane Wilma, many Floridians failed to evacuate areas the storm flooded or to stock up on food, water and other essentials. The cavalier attitude prompted Republican Gov.
Jeb Bush to scold constituents, noting that people who sought relief from Wilma "had ample time to prepare.""It isn't that hard to get 72 hours' worth of food and water," Bush said last week.
But it's not something to which Americans are conditioned. Oh, people on the Great Plains put blankets and candles and bags of candy bars in their trunks when driving out of town in the winter, and the Mormons (forget theology for a moment) make a literal religious point about preparedness (Mormon families are supposed to stockpile at least a year's food), both admirable traits - and both as rare as hen's teeth in society at large.
"Even something like Katrina — where everybody watched that unfold and understood what those poor folks were going through — as compelling as that was, we're all busy people. And how long does it stick if you don't get reminded again and again and again?" [a FEMA official] said.Well, my long layoff in '03 helped. I usually have a solid week's worth of canned or dry food in the house; one never knows when it'll come in handy even in non-emergencies.
Pitching the preparedness campaign to school children could be successful, he said, noting the fire prevention and anti-smoking programs that targeted students.
"The great lesson of all of these events is interdependence," Chertoff said. "We're all dependent on everybody else. Everybody has their role to play, and if people fail in their role, it's going to have a cascading effect."That, actually, was a great lesson of 9/11; Americans aren't stupid, and when there's a crisis, most of them will step up and pull on reserves they (and society at large) didn't know they had.
Of course, it's a lot easier to draw on reserves of grit and pluck when you have enough food and water to keep your family at least comfortable while things are getting back to normal.
I know. Pretty uncool.
Posted by Mitch at November 2, 2005 12:12 PM | TrackBack
Brave America, Chicken America. So cowering behind plastic sheeting in a midwestern suburb is a virtue, eh? Let me know when one of your red states builds anything a self-respecting terrorist would want to take out. (Note: the giant ball of twine doesn't count.)
Posted by: angryclown at November 2, 2005 10:49 AMRight as usual Mitch. The chattering classes will scoff at attempts to teach preparedness in schools (watch for Duck & Cover references), but they are fine scaring the heck out of 1st graders by doing "Lock Down" drills to quickly get to a safe room should someone enter the school with a gun. (Probably because guns = BAD, while terrorist attacks = inevitable/our fault anyway/preventable through capitulation.)
Posted by: chriss at November 2, 2005 10:53 AMSchools should only be used to discuss issues of national importance?? They had a cop at my daughter's school talking about Halloween safety and my daughter came home in a panic because said cop told her that her princess dress was 2" too long and she might trip.
They are already discussing safety, and with regard to some very scary situations. Failure to add an age-appropriate discussion on disaster preparedness is willfully irresponsible.
Ah, yes, the New Yorker, laughing at adversity (even as every facet of his life is made possible only by the most massive human-support infrastructure ever built, without which the whole area would revert to the huge malarial swamp it once was).
Posted by: mitch at November 2, 2005 10:55 AMAngry Clown - do do realize you've precisely reinforced Mitch's point, don't you?
Posted by: Andrea at November 2, 2005 10:57 AMSo far all the casualties in the War on Terror are in D.C. and New York, where people do their jobs while taking reasonable precautions. (Batteries, flashlights, radio? Check. Out of town contact for when cell phones don't work? Check. Plenty of food, water and beer? Check. Evacuation plan... You get the idea.)
Of course it would help if a little more Homeland Security funding went to the places that have actually experienced crashing planes, anthrax attacks, bombs and the like, rather than to install face-recognition in the Olsens' General Store, but that's a quibble.
I'm simply mocking the delusions of Chicken Littles in suburbs in the middle of the country who think that plastic and duct tape will protect them from being gassed by terrorists. Even if terrorists had the capability to do so. Or cared to attack some relative backwater if they did.
Posted by: angryclown at November 2, 2005 11:28 AMAngry Clown -- is it ignorance or bias that underlies your assumption that Mitch lives in a suburb?
Posted by: Peter Hoh at November 2, 2005 11:53 AMI was not directing my angry clown comments at Mitch, whom I hold in the highest personal esteem. I mock only those whose foot fits the shoe.
Posted by: angryclown at November 2, 2005 12:00 PMClown,
Posted by: chriss at November 2, 2005 12:07 PMBravo! A perfect demonstration of the condescending, What's The Matter With Kansas attitude that's been such a big winner for the left!
Population of red-voting exurban areas = growing like mad.
Population of blue-voting urban area = same or shrinking.
Keep up the mockery of people who want to take simple precautions to protect their family (while their sons and daughters fight to keep you safe) and I'm sure you'll maintain your firm grip on American power.
Another point: Hurricane preparedness of residents in red voting areas was a heckuva lot better than hurricane preparedness in blue voting areas. Now red state voters and tax payers are footing the bill.
By the way:
Biggest ball of string = Kansas (in what seems like a fun community building activity)
Biggest ball of string made by one crackpot = Minnesota, bluest of blue states
Red states have no monopoly on twine-based hijinks.
Clown,
Mitch's post is mostly about disaster preparedness, not just in cases of terrorist attacks. Your attack is a non sequitor.
Posted by: JamesPh. at November 2, 2005 12:11 PMBy all means, prepare for the tornadoes, hail storms and locust attacks that a just and vengeful God visits on your part of the country! Just don't think that duct tape and plastic sheeting will spare your miserable lives!!!
Posted by: angryclown at November 2, 2005 12:20 PM"By all means, prepare for the tornadoes, hail storms and locust attacks that a just and vengeful God visits on your part of the country! Just don't think that duct tape and plastic sheeting will spare your miserable lives!!!"
Well, it might keep the rain out, when the roof's blown off. And it might, just might, keep someone from dying in some sort of gas attack. Not likely, I'll admit, but it's better than sitting in front of a broken window while the poison clouds roll towards your house.
But thanks for the condescending, elitist attitude. That really helps promote your position.
Posted by: Pious Agnostic at November 2, 2005 12:47 PMAssembled commenters,
Allow me to introduce Angryclown, an old friend of mine who is thrice damned; a lawyer, a member of the mainstream media, and a New York liberal (where "Liberal" = "thinks Mao Zedong was a neocon"). He's also, near as I can tell, an example of the type of New Yorker that even New Yorkers like to throw trash at; a non-native who's adopted "New Yorkism" with the kind of zeal that makes all the best suicide bombers and Scientologists.
He also likes to yank the chains of everyone west of the Hudson with his Mencken-like japes at everyone in the US who:
a) has a concept of "grass"
b) gets to and from work through the open air
c) never has to pick cockroaches out of their bologna paella while pleading vainly for the six union plumbers working on their drippy faucet to quit urinating behind the fridge.
As much as Angryclown (whose true identity I will not reveal, because I'm sure Liberal Central Control would take umbrage at a true believer spending time here) and I disagree, I hereby state that I hope that when some TRULY major catastrophe hits NYC, and the whole city is cut off from food, water, sanitation and other government services for a New-Orleans-y amount of time, that he and his family are among the five million who survive by eating the 15 million others.
Don't say I never did anything for you, AC.
Posted by: mitch at November 2, 2005 12:48 PM"Let me know when one of your red states builds anything a self-respecting terrorist would want to take out."
Note to the agricultural heartland: AngryClown apparently doesn't know where food comes from so, please, stop growing and shipping food to major metropolitan areas to remind him. Then, just watch his "enlightened" NYC society fall into a starving chaos.
Posted by: Ryan at November 2, 2005 01:01 PM*shrug* OK, here I am a liberal with a month's worth of food, gallon containers I can fill with tap water at a moment's notice, easily a six month hedge against unemployment, always carry somewhere between $100 and $200 at any given moment, have no debt whatsoever, yaddi yaddi yadda, so I guess my question is: to stay current with my belief system, who should I give all this to so I can live out your prodigious liberal fantasy? *glances at the current national debt figure* Oh, never mind. Its covered.
We're a soft target. Yeah, plastic sheeting and duct tape would do some good, but in a world where a half dozen biochemists could set up an anthrax production line with a small business association loan and put open bags of the finished product in the back of a pickup truck before driving around the nation's interstate system (If its Tuesday this must be Cleveland) -- I'm sorry, I must end this sentence now.
Well, the plastic sheeting brigade might help, but we are still fubared: We're an open society. I could get more into that, since I believe this is a fight for mindshare as much as it is a military fight but there are powerful forces within our own society which actively hinder that effort. As I said, I could get more into that but its slightly off topic.
Here's my big disaster scenerio question: what happens to the upper midwest if there is a major disruption of natural gas supplies in the middle of winter, major as in something going BOOM, or a major ice storm such as in Quebec not too far back which brings down power lines over a hurricane-sized area when its 10 below?
Posted by: Bill Haverberg at November 2, 2005 02:18 PMForgot to add this.
Prediction: If/When Avian flu hits the U.S., most or all daycare centers across the U.S. will close. It will either be a government mandate to check the spread of flu, or a spontanious action by worried parents and providers.
For discussion: What happens next?
Posted by: Bill Haverberg at November 2, 2005 02:26 PM"Mencken-like?" I hope you were being sarcastic. Mencken at least had a way with words.
Posted by: Steve G. at November 2, 2005 02:27 PMBill, only 10 below? Come on, this is Minnesota, at least give us a challenge.
40 below, with an additional wind-chill. . . now we're talking! I may have to dip into my blanket reserve then.
Posted by: Ryan at November 2, 2005 02:31 PMRyan:
You mean food doesn't come from Katzinger's Deli or the bodega down the street?
Oh lordy, will wonders never cease!
Posted by: jackscrow at November 2, 2005 03:05 PMSteve,
as to Angryclown's Menckeninity, I have to refer to privileged information. Bear in mind Mencken was the D.W. Griffith of the Gatsby crowd.
Bill H: Actually, there is material for a couple of really fascinating posts there. Either you go and start a blog, or I'll write those posts in the next couple of days...
Peter: Angryclown assumes everyone west of the Hudson River looks like someone from "Deliverance", yet lives in a tacky Lakeville-style McMansion - at least for purposes of enraging everyone west of the Hudson for comedic effect.
Posted by: mitch at November 2, 2005 03:18 PMBill,
Having watched that first hand, the solution to Quebec wasn't too bad. Lots of generators, alternate means of heat (kero, LP, etc). Honestly, given how Quebec is you have to be reasonably well prepared up there and they were. Sure, there was disruption and whatnot, but nothing massive as far as loss of life. Be prepared: generator, redundant heat sources, extra food, ability to relocate, etc and you'll be fine. That said, watch out for the neighbor who can't do that. But then again, all that points to Mitch's point: if preparedness is a state of mind, attitude, and in general a good lifestyle. And it's a shame that it seems that the more urban you are the more you are willing to give up selfreliance.
Memories of idiots from Boston hiking the Appalacian Trail in the White Mountains without appropriate clothing, water, or emergency supplies come flooding back. I can't count the number of times I had to give away water bottles and take folks back to civilization there who were in way over their heads. They simply went out unprepared and trusted that there'd be someone there to make them safe. In one case they were lucky I came by or they'd have spent an August night in subfreezing temperatures in just shorts and a t-shirt.
Posted by: nerdbert at November 2, 2005 03:49 PMHere's my big disaster scenerio question: what happens to the upper midwest if there is a major disruption of natural gas supplies in the middle of winter, major as in something going BOOM, or a major ice storm such as in Quebec not too far back which brings down power lines over a hurricane-sized area when its 10 below?
Posted by: Eracus at November 2, 2005 03:54 PM----------------
Oh, I dunno, Bill. Burn wood maybe? Fire up the generators? From here to Canada lives a pretty hearty bunch. We're sometimes disappointed if it only gets to 10 below and there's not at least 4ft of snow. Alot of people are out of work when that happens and then there's nothing to do but get drunk and catch fish. Now, if we start to run out of beer and Windsor, THAT might present a problem, but then we'd just head for Wisconsin or Canada.
Mitch-
Care to elaborate on this one?
"Bear in mind Mencken was the D.W. Griffith of the Gatsby crowd."
I know who Mencken was. I know who Griffith was. And I understand the reference to the "Gatsby crowd." How they are possibly connected escapes me.
Posted by: the elder at November 2, 2005 04:08 PMGriffith and Mencken = highly respected observers in their fields.
Griffith: known for bigotry toward Blacks.
Mencken: known for bigotry toward anyone who wasn't H.L. Mencken or very nearly like him.
Posted by: meeyotch at November 2, 2005 05:30 PMSo, if/when I ever do start my blog "Another Mad Liberal" (which is currently at the fantasy stage along with "Blog from a Northern Town", my other choice for a name), I'll be able to tell people its because Mitch told me to ;-)
Posted by: Bill Haverberg at November 3, 2005 07:35 AMI'm trying to remember the sequence of events. Wasn't it: anthrax-in-the-mail media-hyped scare first, plastic sheeting response second?
I doubt the feds would have recommended plastic sheeting in response to Katrina, to in response to Bill's blizzard scenario.
Sounds as if Bill and Angry Clown are ridiculing a potential response to an anthrax scare as being an inadequate response to a blizzard. Well, Duh! Doesn't mean it wasn't the best option for the moment.
It seems Bill and AC have decided that we're all doomed and nothing can be done about it so there's no sense trying. The technical term for that attitude is defeatist. Not many of us reading this blog share said attitude.
Going out on a limb, I'd bet dollars to donuts that Bill and AC, having exempted themselves from personal responsibility for disaster planning, would be first in line to abuse FEMA for failing to prepare to swiftly pamper them after any disaster.
That aside, the blizzard scenario raises an interesting possibility. If you want to add a terrorist twist, imagine terrorists figure out a way to knock out electricity to St. Paul (or if you must have a worthy target, Chicago or New York City) during a blizzard. If they could take out enough transmission towers or power substations, it may take a week to get power back on and without electricity, thermostats won't work, furnaces won't light, people will freeze.
Sure, I have a generator, but my furnace won't run off it unless I could jimmy rig something for a while. But my neighbor doesn't have a generator. That's okay, she's cute and we can share body heat. But about 10,000 of Mitch's neighbors to the East don't have generators, either, and many of them wouldn't be as desireable as houseguests.
So then what?
Posted by: nathan bissonette at November 3, 2005 08:43 AM.
"Sure, I have a generator, but my furnace won't run off it unless I could jimmy rig something for a while."
Look into a power transfer system that allows you to switch between the mains and the generator. They run around $300 installed (well, maybe not in MN where you have union electricians; you guys might have to double that price). Either that or remember to throw the main and risk reversing through one of your larger breakers. If you don't throw the main breaker you risk zapping one of the line workers trying to restore your power, as happened after Andrew. the PTS is a heck of a lot cleaner than trying to run all those extension cords around the house, but you do have to remember to throw the breakers to keep only those things running you really need running (furnace, pump, etc) unless you have an immense backup generator.
Posted by: nerdbert at November 3, 2005 09:22 AM"Sounds as if Bill and Angry Clown are ridiculing a potential response to an anthrax scare as being an inadequate response to a blizzard. Well, Duh! Doesn't mean it wasn't the best option for the moment."
"It seems Bill and AC have decided that we're all doomed and nothing can be done about it so there's no sense trying. The technical term for that attitude is defeatist."
The technical term for your argument is "straw man."
Angry Clown thinks you're right to worry about blizzards out/up there - not to mention extreme existential despair. Not so much the terrorist gas or bioweapons attacks, though, which is what the plastic sheeting and duct tape is supposed to protect you from.
Go rent Red Dawn if you want to fantasize about an unlikely attack scenario. The terrorists aren't coming to St. Paul anymore than the Russians were. They have bigger fish to fry.
Posted by: angryclown at November 3, 2005 09:44 AMRight, you are, Angry Clown.
Because like when terrorists operating in Israel are, to the Knesset don't they directly go? I ask you?
Not like a stupid PIZZERIA they'd bomb, right? Or like some versclitzende KIBBUTZ in the middle of nowhere? Oy. Such morons.
Posted by: Angritz Klaunstein at November 3, 2005 09:51 AMNathan, please go back and reread what I wrote. I am not your strawman.
Posted by: Bill Haverberg at November 3, 2005 11:05 AMWell we wouldn't mind putting burqas on you anyway. Repeat after me, midwesterners: "Would I like cheese with that? NO THANK YOU."
Posted by: angryclown at November 3, 2005 11:32 AMAnd with that, the angryclown shows the myopia and provinciality that make those from NYC so maligned everywhere else, even in deeply Democratic areas like south Florida. *sigh*
And folks wondered why "snowbird" was not spoken with anything other than derision down in Palm Beach county.
Posted by: nerdbert at November 3, 2005 11:54 AM"The terrorists aren't coming to St. Paul anymore than the Russians were."
Thanks, Angry Clown, I appreciate the info. I called my insurance carrier to let them know, and to request that they reinstate my terrorism coverage (my carrier dropped that coverage when my policies renewed after 9/11). But to my surprise, they declined to reinstate it! They said your word wasn't a good enough guarantee for their underwriters.
Luckily, I have a fallback position, and not a straw man, either. Since you're so confident of your facts, I assume you're willing to put your money where your mouth is. I need about $1 million terrorism coverage to cover a few rental properties in St. Paul. Since by your own assertion there is no risk of loss, obviously the premium will be practically nothing. Please let me know where to mail the application.
.
Posted by: nathan bissonette at November 4, 2005 10:25 AMSure Nathan, I'll insure your little slumlord empire against terrorism. The premium is one case of Brooklyn Lager every month. Send it to Mitch. I'll collect next time I'm in the Twinkies.
Wait a minute, a credit check shows you have a French-sounding last name. I'll have to double the premium since I can't be sure you're a real right-winger. Can't you change it to something more American, like John Birch or Joe McCarthy?
Posted by: angryclown at November 4, 2005 01:47 PMWe recommend you to visit excellent galvanize site. qY0ptan0x
Posted by: galvanize at July 16, 2006 04:19 AM