shotbanner.jpeg

July 19, 2005

Saint Paul Greens and Education

Normally, I couldn't care less about the platforms or "visions" olf minor parties. I'd be hard-pressed to post the "visions" of the Constitution Party, the Socialist Workers, the Libertarians...

But the Greens in the Twin Cities are another matter. They're a minor party, to be sure - but one that exists amid a population of ageing ex-hippies and dozey college kids taught by - well, ex-hippies.

So the Greens have found disproportionate success in the Twin Cities; the Minneapolis City Council includes a few Greens, and parts of Saint Paul are just whacked out to do the same.

The local Green boss has been publishing the Saint Paul Green Party's "vision" for the city on a saint paul politics listserve. I'm re-posting them without permission - it's public stuff, what are they gonna do?


The problem with the Greens is that, inside all the post-hippie dreck, there are some decent ideals - things almost anyone can believe in. There are also a few policies that are useful - at a very, very low level, anyway. But you put it all together, and slather on a layer of the joyless, puritan sanctimony that the Greens bring to everything...

...well, let's just get into it.

The quality of public schools is a measure of a community's belief in its people and its future.

The Green vision includes schools in which each child is nurtured and
encouraged to develop to his/her full potential, not just as a member
of the work force but as an informed citizen and a well-rounded human
being.

Hard to argue with that, right?

Of course, the devil is in the details:

It honors teaching as one of the most important functions in the community and supports that function with adequate funding and small class sizes.
Ah. "Honor".

Our society "honors" teachers plenty. It's an important job, doncha know. But at the end of the day, the teacher still works in a stultifying bureaucracy, as part of a union that refuses to "honor" teachers that actually throw themselves into being great teachers.

It fosters creativity and appreciation for all forms of art.
I'm all for that, by the way; the "All Three Rs, All The Time" idea that's become a fetish among some conservatives is deeply misguided.

Unfortunately, to the Greens and their deeply (myopically) communitarian view, schools aren't just a place where kids learn. Last year, they endorsed Richard Broderick for the school board:

In order for our society to adopt these values -- as it must, if we are to survive on this planet -- we need to nurture the instinctively Green consciousness of our young people through the comprehensive application of these principles to curriculum, instruction, administration, and district-wide decision-making processes.
Got that? School is here to "nurture instinctively Green consciousness". That's called "indoctrination" - creating a generation of little Greens.

It's in the "vision", too:

It includes instruction and practice in conflict-resolution and peaceful solutions to interpersonal and social problems.

In a Green city that values nonviolence, programs such as ROTC and
military recruitment would have no place in the schools, along with
corporate influence over instructional materials.

"Peaceful resolution", no JROTC or military recruitment...

...in other words, not only do they want to indoctrinate children into the Green lifestyle, but they want to add the politics, too.

Participatory sports would be especially encouraged.

Above all, in the Green vision education is a lifelong enterprise, and
there will be abundant opportunities for adults to pursue it.

Small classes, lifetime education...

...where is all that money coming from?

That's later in the "vision".

Posted by Mitch at July 19, 2005 06:51 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Greens are, what I call, "environmental communists". They want uber-control by government to force people down their utopian path to making our country into a ludite (sp?) paradise.

What a bunch of shallow thinking hippie losers.

Posted by: Dave at July 19, 2005 08:56 AM

In India, China, Japan, and South Korea they teach lots of math, chemistry, and physics in school. Lets try that for a change....

Posted by: RBMN at July 19, 2005 08:58 AM

RBMN, they already have those classes in all of the public schools that I'm aware of. China has competitive admission to high schools that results in students driven to study 12+ hours per day. They rotely memorize textbooks and don't have time for pleasantries such as creative thinking. It's difficult to compare America to these Asian countries because the cultural differences would make their educational systems impossible to implement here (and arguably undesirable on a variety of levels).

Posted by: Michael Lomker at July 19, 2005 11:04 AM

Re: Michael Lomker at July 19, 2005 11:04 AM

I disagree. The childhood learning experience should be as close to the prison work camp experience as good mental and physical health will allow. Kids are tough, and that's when the learning is easiest and sinks in for life. Who's the family's interpreter in every new immigrant family? Give your kids good reasons to want to grow up, get out, and get their own place. And it's easier for them to do, because they speak three languages that they learned before they were eight years old.

Posted by: RBMN at July 19, 2005 11:50 AM

RBMN, I typically agree with much of what you say, but not this time. I am, and always have been, terrible at math, and no amount of "prison work camp experience" would have made much of a difference, except for possibly making me feel even worse about my inability to grasp mathematical concepts. On the flip side, I was a voracious reader and excelled at reading comprehension and speed to the point where I was doing reading assignments as much as two grades above my level. Point is, some kids are wired to excel at certain subjects and not others.

As to Michael Lomker's point about creative thinking, I've often felt a little cheated that elementary, middle school and high school (hell, even COLLEGE) didn't do more to encourage critical and creative thinking, and instead focused on pointless date and name memorization.

One of my current gripes about public education is that it consistently churns out graduates who, though extremely bright, are basically automotons who haven't learned to raise an eyebrow and actually question some of the things they learned, which makes it all sorts of easy for college profs to sell their interpretation of history, politics and whatever to a classroom of students who often don't know enough to disagree.

I've had to learn most of my critical thinking skills on my own, and relatively recently, like within the last ten years. It would have been nice to have had critical thinking encouraged at a younger age, because I have a sneaking suspicion I would have enjoyed that, and probably have done well to boot.

Posted by: Ryan at July 19, 2005 01:23 PM

Tell about the green housing Mitch...go ahead..tell!

Posted by: swiftee at July 19, 2005 03:25 PM

One per day, Swiftee. It stretches the fun.

Posted by: mitch at July 19, 2005 03:38 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi