The Australian election passed with relatively little note in the US media. John O'Sullivan notes that it deserves coverage:
John Howard beat Mark Latham in what is, by Ozzie standards, a landslide. O'Sullivan notes:
I remember when Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister in the UK; it was well before Reagan's election, and it served as a bellwether of the conservative tide.If Labor had won, the world would have seen the result as a dramatic erosion of international support for George Bush's Iraq intervention — much more important than the Spanish elections (which threw out a Bush ally in favor of a left-wing government that immediately withdrew Spanish troops).
Australia has been a faithful U.S. ally in every American war since 1917 without needing (in John Kerry's words) to be either "coerced or bribed." At risk was a splintering of the English-speaking alliance (America, Australia and Great Britain) that has been the moral and military core of the war on terrorism.
A Howard defeat would have been a setback for the Anglosphere, a disaster for the United States and a catastrophe for George W. Bush (and Tony Blair). And it would have been celebrated as such — make no mistake — by France, Germany, Middle Eastern despots, the United Nations, and the massed NGOs (non-governmental organizations) of the "international community."
But Howard won. Indeed, he won a landslide of sweeping proportions — something rare by the standards of the cautious Aussie electorate.
While the Australian election was about much more than just the war on terror, Howard's election was, at the very least, a major reinforcement of moderate-conservative values and Bush's war policy. We've "held our base", and a key member of the Coalition and a lynchpin of the Anglosphere has fairly resoundingly signed on for another hitch.
So that makes three bits of quietly good news in a week - the debate, the shoring-up of the polls, and how Howard.
Hm - why haven't any of them gotten any coverage?
Posted by Mitch at October 11, 2004 08:34 AM | TrackBack
Let's see, here. The WHOLE WORLD hates us. But, Australia soundly trounced the fellow who hates us most, Schroeder loses more seats in parliament every time he turns around, free and mostly calm elections in Afghanistan (who supports us), but not in Russia (who doesn't, apparently). Because really, if it is just the French and the Islamofascists that hate us, I'm a lot less concerned about the whole "respected in the world" thingy.
Posted by: Patrick at October 11, 2004 09:44 AM