Listened to Russert on the Today show this morning (yeah, I know - I should stop).
Talking about the war in Iraq, Russert said (I'm paraphrasing very closely here, but it's not quite a quote) that the Abu Ghraib scandal continues to hack away at the justifiation for the war, since no WMDs have been found.
No WMDs have been found.
I'm convinced - the Islamofascists could set off a sarin bomb (four liters or forty or four thousand) in Birmingham or Dallas or Pierre, in a truck labelled "From Uday With Love, Allahu Akbar", and NBC et al wouldn't make the connection - or bury it - until something happened in New York proper.
UPDATE: Smash's analysis of the sarin shell. Read the whole piece for the assumptions involved - which lead to his conclusions:
Much more to come. Posted by Mitch at May 21, 2004 07:48 AM
- Sometime between 1988-95, Saddam developed and manufactured sophisticated, “mix-in-flight” binary chemical weapons.
- He failed to declare these weapons, as required, to UN weapons inspectors.
- Iraq did not destroy all of its chemical weapons.
- A stockpile of artillery shells, including at least some that contain chemical warheads, has been found by “insurgents” in Iraq.
You know what really hurts? And I mean hurts in that way that feels like Paul Bunyan is jumping up and down on your chest? What hurts is the realization that most of the media has decided we've lost this war and they seem almost gleeful about it. It deflates me. It really does.
Posted by: Ryan at May 21, 2004 09:28 AMAre you serious Mitch? He said that! Damn, it almost makes you want to have Fox run the story 24/7 just like the prison scandel just so maybe, maybe, enough people will have heard about it. The Star Tribune had a letter to the editor yesterday that had more coverage on it than the story on A6 a few days ago. What a shame...it deflates me as well Ryan.
Posted by: Dave at May 21, 2004 10:08 AM