shotbanner.jpeg

April 17, 2006

A Little Help, Here?

Rambix is trolling for ideas to deal with the quagmire in Minneapolis:

What's the solution for violent crime in Minneapolis? No one seems to have the right answer, although a lot of people have opinions.

Maybe it's time to solicit ideas from the general public. There's a fair chance that some of Minneapolis' leadership monitors this blog, among others, so maybe you can have an impact. Post some ideas in the comments to this post if you like. Replacing Mayor Rybak and the entire City Council and letting Governor Pawlenty pick their replacements is a good idea, but unfeasible, so don't offer that.

After the news of the past week or two, I'm tempted to suggest "require all law-abiding citizens to carry assault weapons", but I'm sure there's something more subtle out there.

Posted by Mitch at April 17, 2006 06:29 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I think the weapons requirement is an excellent idea. It has worked in other cities that have refused to adequately fund the police.

I'm guessing veryone wold be a lot more polite too if they knew everyone was packing heat!

Posted by: Tracy at April 17, 2006 03:49 PM

I don't know exactly what the law is, but people pack in Asheville, NC. You can shop in the jewelry stores well into the night. All the clerks are carrying. Restaurants stay open late and the ice cream parlours do a good business with kids on Saturday nights. The first thing you notice in a typical restaurant is all the guns on the tables. Your weapon just can't be concealed is all, and you can't be intoxicated. I don't think you can even be served. Most are holstered plainly on the hip. Occasionally, you'll see a shoulder harnass, but it's either a cop or someone just puttin' on airs. They have crime, certainly, just not much downtown as I recall, where people tended to be polite even to Yankee citiots.

The U.S. Constitution guarantees our right to own a gun. Why not wear it if you want to? Why all this "concealed" permit business? Why conceal it?

Posted by: Eracus at April 18, 2006 02:56 AM

Use of the term "concealed carry" in regards to MN statutes is a misnomer. Nothing in statute requires concealment of your legally carried firearm. I think most people that carry in MN conceal because they (1) think they have to; and (2) they wouldn't want to unduly frighten the control freaks that consider firearms themselves to be possessed of evil.

Posted by: BobbyRay at April 18, 2006 06:53 AM

Eracus said: "The U.S. Constitution guarantees our right to own a gun."

Out of curiosity, if the Bench had a majority of (I can't recall the proper name) judges that believed the Constitution should be interpretted with the understanding of the time in which it was written, would the right to gun ownership be overturned since it says, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." With particular emphasis to the "well regulated militia part."

Fulcrum

Posted by: Fulcrum at April 18, 2006 11:41 AM

Fulcrum:

1) I think the term you were looking for was "Justices"

2) Why should the phrase "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state" be interpreted to modify or restrict the second part of the amendment?

What if there had been an amendment stating:
"A well educated electorate being necessary to the self-governance of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books, shall not be infringed."
Would that mean that the "right" of the people to keep books could be restricted if we no longer had compulsary education?

Judicial intrepretation is a funny thing. See Dred Scott v. Sanford for a constitutional interpretation based on original intent.

Posted by: BobbyRay at April 18, 2006 12:11 PM

Fulcrum

You need to read "The Embarassing Second Amendment" by U of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson. Levinson - a self-described liberal and non-gunny - pretty well shreds the "well regulated militia" case for gun control, largely BECAUSE the contemporary understanding of militia was "everyone knows how to shoot".

http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/embar.html

Posted by: mitch at April 18, 2006 12:29 PM

BR: I know the terms Justices shoudl have been used instead of judges, but the word I was looking for was the one that describes Justices who believe the Constitution should be interpretted based upon original intent....this made me wonder what the phrase, "A well regulated militia." meant back then.

And i agree with you here, "Judicial intrepretation is a funny thing. See Dred Scott v. Sanford for a constitutional interpretation based on original intent."

How can Justices be taken seriously with a stance like that? How does a Justice interpret the constitutionality of issues that our Founding Fathers could not even have dreamt of, say...the Internet?

Fulcrum

Posted by: Fulcrum at April 18, 2006 12:34 PM

The reader comment Rambix posted was brilliant! Glad you linked to it, Mitch.

One thing - I don't think you should say he's trolling for ideas. Makes me think of that idiot coward Angry Clown.

How about "soliciting?" No, too University Avenue. How about "begging?" No, too Hennepin Avenue.

Wish I were a brilliant English genius, then I could come up with a great word, for sure.

.

Posted by: nathan bissonette at April 18, 2006 02:24 PM

liar

Posted by: liar at September 18, 2006 07:16 PM

ex wife nude wife voyeur amateur

Posted by: Gdnunw at October 8, 2006 08:57 PM

hardcore family incest comic incest

Posted by: Wuoqzkvu at October 8, 2006 08:58 PM

ex wife nude wife voyeur amateur

Posted by: Gdnunw at October 8, 2006 09:00 PM

hardcore family incest comic incest

Posted by: Wuoqzkvu at October 8, 2006 09:00 PM

teen girls sexy teen cuties

Posted by: Edlpqmvd at October 9, 2006 08:50 AM

teen girls sexy teen cuties

Posted by: Edlpqmvd at October 9, 2006 08:53 AM

teen girls sexy teen cuties

Posted by: Edlpqmvd at October 9, 2006 08:53 AM

lesbian wrestling lesbian pornography

Posted by: Reuxpwjukj at October 9, 2006 09:47 PM

big bbw bbw belly

Posted by: Nibhfjqhc at October 9, 2006 09:47 PM

big bbw bbw belly

Posted by: Nibhfjqhc at October 9, 2006 09:48 PM

lesbian wrestling lesbian pornography

Posted by: Reuxpwjukj at October 9, 2006 09:49 PM

lesbian wrestling lesbian pornography

Posted by: Reuxpwjukj at October 9, 2006 09:50 PM

red pussy pussy eating techniques

Posted by: Ouxet at October 10, 2006 09:26 AM

red pussy pussy eating techniques

Posted by: Ouxet at October 10, 2006 09:27 AM

red pussy pussy eating techniques

Posted by: Ouxet at October 10, 2006 09:27 AM

interracial white teen girls interracial gangbang videos

Posted by: Vqowtdxay at October 29, 2006 03:16 AM

horny ebony girls ebony exotic dancers

Posted by: Hlasveheo at October 30, 2006 07:29 AM

wifes tits kelis tits

Posted by: Nqnqbagmf at October 30, 2006 07:29 AM

ugly tits big tit babes

Posted by: Ndfcaefkor at October 30, 2006 01:29 PM

fetish mpegs xxx video free kinky bizarre perversion fetish

Posted by: Daogsgquxw at October 30, 2006 01:30 PM

dripping pussies hot pussy closeups

Posted by: Rvcp at October 30, 2006 06:41 PM

mr. big cock hard core xxx big cock

Posted by: Ofizpcnajp at October 30, 2006 06:41 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi