shotbanner.jpeg

November 28, 2005

Confusion?

Just One Minute on Andrea Mitchell's odd story (or change in story) in re the Plame affair.

Posted by Mitch at November 28, 2005 07:08 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Mitch,

In contrast to your mythology of my "long debunked" items.. please place

"MITCHELL: No. And you know, there's a lot of rumor. There's been denials from the White House. Joe Wilson, he now inappropriately suggested that Karl Rove may have been the person. What he really should have been saying is that he believes Karl Rove was circulating the story after Novak put it out. So we don't know who that person was. There have been suggestions regarding the vice president's office. These have been denied. But it's really..."

as one of yours. Rove pretty clearly WAS in fact involved in circulating names prior to it being outted, he did part of the outing, that's part of the facts of the indictment as I recall. So Mitchell's comments, and those echoed here at times (by you? - I'd bet if I looked I'd find it), that Wilson was factually/temporally in error and therefore innappropriate for asserting Rove was involved beforehand, were in fact, inappropriate themselves and debunked by this article and the later facts of the indictment. In that idictment, Rove is quoted as admitting to contacting (mind blank - the times guy) prior to Novak's column, but then "forgetting" it. Thank you for posting it.

PB

Posted by: pb at November 28, 2005 11:12 PM


Plavuse Seka Aleksic Jebanje Seka Aleksic Karanje Seka Aleksic Porno Seka Aleksic Gola

Posted by: Seka Aleksic at May 6, 2006 06:37 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi