I'd be rather tempted to replace it with a copy of "Free to Choose"...

The title is, however, today's worst pun in the blogosphere.

"Mao probably is a more appealing leftist than Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi."

I understand the impulse to snarky humor, but how is this better than the Bush=Hitler stuff from the left (neglecting the issue that Hitler belongs on the "left", of course)? I'm afraid that this sort of discourse defines evil down every bit as much.

Pelosi and Reid have the "banal" part of "the banality of evil" down pat, but as to the "evil" part, they're still playing in Pop Warner. Frankly, they don't even rise to the level of Robert Byrd, though I don't know whether that is caused by a lack of desire or a lack of native ability. (Perhaps I should say upbringing rather than native ability? That whole nature vs. nurture thing is complex; I'd hate to be politically incorrect.)

Perhaps the saddest thing to me is that far too many on the left wouldn't understand why they should be mortally offended to be compared to a dictatorial mass murderer like Mao.

Doug,

You're right on pretty much every count.

Lefties, be advised: Nancy Pelosi is neither evil, nor worse than Mao.

You obviously have no idea what BookCrossing is. It's not a Communist plot. It's a way to randomly share books with strangers.

In other words, the message on the sticker has nothing to do with the contents of the book.

By the way, I think it is important that people read the Little Red Book, for the same reason I think it's important that people read Das Kapital and Mein Kampf. We need to understand these ideas if we are understand their appeal and prevent them from reoccurring.

P.S.: Doug -- are you seriously suggesting Hitler was a leftist? I suggest you read less NewsMax and more history books. Just because "National Socialist" has "socialist" in its name doesn't mean the Nazis were leftist, any more than having "Democratic" in a country's name makes it a democracy.

Luke,

I agree, we SHOULD read books about philosophies we loathe. I've read LRB, Kapital, Mein Kampf (German and English), Freud, Nietzche, Marx - I have a shelf of "enemies" in my bookcase.

However, the "Hitler was right-wing" meme is one you might want to re-examine; just because he murdered Communists and fought the Russians doesn't make him right-wing. He (and Mussolini) both learned a lot from observing Lenin. And perhaps a more useful metric for determining left-ness and right-itude than titles and enemies is the overall goal of the movement. Right-wing autocracies control the nation, frequently exalting the nation or attributes of the society in the process; left-wing ones try to remake the nation and society from the core. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot were all leftists; Mussolini was more ultra-right. By that standard, Hitler borrowed heavily from both; Nazissm exalted and mythologized aspects of traditional German society (its Carolingian and pre-Roman past, as well as the concept of "Volk", something that is very hard to explain to Americans, even for a guy with undergrad minors in German and History), while also seeking to radically re-engineer German society in a way more consistent with Lenin and Stalin than with Mussolini.

In other words, Hitler was a moderate. ;-)

csIt is there - http://antyhose.uplyn.net/hooter-girl-pantyhose.html
secretary panties
http://antyhose.uplyn.net/girls-like-wearing-pantyhose.html
http://antyhose.uplyn.net/art-of-pantyhose.html
panties under pantyhose
http://antyhose.uplyn.net/men-wearing-pantyhose-portal.html
girls wearing stockings
xxx stockings
tied in pantyhose
http://antyhose.uplyn.net/very-young-girls-in-panties.html