Shot In The Dark: King Is In The Building

December 29, 2004

King Is In The Building

I thought it was pretty neat we got under his skin, but we now clearly have Coleman's undies in a twist. That's more cool than words can express.

Does it occur to anyone else that Nick is now riding on NARN's coattails rather than the other way around? Year of the blog, fool!

Tune in to the NARN on Saturday. It's going to be a fun discussion.

Maybe Nick will call in.

Posted by Mitch at December 29, 2004 11:06 AM | TrackBack

Comments

I guess I'm in for hour 3, then?

Thanks for kind linkage.

Posted by: kb at December 29, 2004 11:27 AM

Why would Coleman call in? Did Nick get his thousand-dollar ransom?

Posted by: Captain Ed at December 29, 2004 11:38 AM

Whatever happened to Jim Boyd? He's been awful quiet.

Posted by: Fred Boness at December 29, 2004 11:55 AM

I don't understand why the NARN is legitimizing Coleman's tantrum with such lengthy (and rational) responses.

His column reads like a hooked walleye flopping around in the funk at the bottom of the canoe.

It was better when y'all were answering this fool according to his folly.

Posted by: Serona at December 29, 2004 12:08 PM

Hmmm, it seems to me that getting Mighty Oak Nick on the air with the Narn puppy dogs (you know what puppy dogs do to oaks) would EASILY be a $1000 worth of entertainment. You could sell tickets. Then, if he didn't come, you could make even more fun of him, and if he came and walked off you wouldn't even have to pay him.

Of course, I am not sure he is worth the trouble, either. He is certainly not contributing anything of substance to the debate; you often cannot even tell which debate he is raving about.

Nonetheless, keep up the good work, reducing Saint Nick to babbling incoherence.

Posted by: J. Ewing at December 29, 2004 01:13 PM

Nick, of course, will not call in. Given his research skills, he will find the phone # sometime next summer.

Posted by: paul at December 29, 2004 02:03 PM