The Twin Cities' FrankenNet affiliate is advertising for a producer for a as-yet-unannounced morning show (which means Marc Moaron's "Morning Sedition" must really be burning things up.
Here's the advertisement for the new position. The position itself looks pretty crappy and thankless, like most "producer" gigs at third-tier stations (I know - this job description reads almost exactly like the job I held at KSTP-AM back when was the #10 station in the market).
But the real payoff is at the bottom of the job description. Emphasis is added:
Producer Sought for Morning News ProgramWhoah. So let's get this straight - it's an equal opportunity job, but Republicans need not apply?Part-time producer with at least 2 years major market experience sought for new morning news program on 950 AM KSNB in Minneapolis.
Requirements Include:
College level or broadcasting school education or related field of equivalent experience required.
Two (2) years experience as a producer in a broadcast environment or equivalent. [Or equivalent? What? Spinning records at a nightclub? There is no equivalent! - Ed.]
Strong interest, knowledge, awareness, and appetite for local/national current news events. Able to quickly conceptualize stories for radio presentation and is able to write and produce a radio newscast utilizing material from all available sources. Proven ability for accuracy and follow-through. [These will be trained out of you, of course - you're working for FrankenNet, now - Ed.]
Able to effectively screen telephone calls for on-air talk shows in a professional manner while providing accurate information.
Willing to accept responsibility and work under moderate supervision while resolving varied problems, which require general knowledge of companys policies and procedures.
Able to work under pressure and effectively handle the stresses of the responsibilities of the position and assure on-air hosts receive material for broadcast on time as the services performed affect company image, clients and the listening audience [because goodness knows you'd never want to hurt the "image" of Wendy Wilde, who was an embarassment at WCCO, and is easily the most wretched excuse for a talk show host in the Twin Cities today - Ed.].
Have an acceptable on-air presence and voice quality and be able to enunciate clearly and read copy fluently as required. [In the great tradition of those seasoned radio pros Lizzzzzz Winstead, Marc M
oaron, Wendy Wild and Janeane Garawful - Ed.] Consistently works hours required. Works more when required to meet deadlines including odd shifts, weekends, holidays, overtime, evenings, etc. [In other words - you're part-timer, but they'll work you like a sled dog. Hey, pallie - you wanted to get into talk radio! - Ed.]
Work in compliance with Company policies and procedures.
Work effectively in a team environment. [in the sense that the guy in the parade who sweeps up the horses works in a "team environment". Talk radio producers have immense turnover for a reason - Ed.]
Maintain positive and cooperative rapport with staff, management, and clients. [Did they mention that talk radio personalities tend to have egoes that put Diana Ross to shame? - Ed.]
Project an appropriate professional appearance and demeanor.
Qualified candidates are welcome to e-mail their cover letter, resume, and references to:
Janet Robert
E-mail: [redacted]No walk-in candidates will be considered. NO PHONE CALLS PLEASE! REPUBLICANS NEED NOT APPLY! Otherwise...An Equal Opportunity Employer.
jrobert, 10/19/2004 3:28:48 PM
Message#152851
I'm no lawyer. I always snooze through the Human Resources lectures. I also know that the interview is when things like "wrong political affiliation" tend to get weeded out. That's how Minnesota Public Radio does it; they're ultraliberal, but they're not stupid. Even wacko-lefty KFAI will let the odd Republican in the door.
But if you do know HR or EEOE law, I'll toss this out to you. Can they do that? I'm sure its legal, of course - but it's the babbling, head-up-the-butt stupidity of the posting that amazes me.
If its illegal, of course, I'd like to make sure the whole world knows it.
Posted by Mitch at October 24, 2004 09:34 AM | TrackBack
I am not a lawyer, but I think that it is perfectly legal for them to discriminate in any way they want as long as it is not one of the enumerated illegal factors: race, sex, age, religion, ect.
I'm sure a resturant could have "democrate night" and exclude all republicans legally, but they could not legally have a "white night".
Posted by: Robert Brown at October 24, 2004 09:48 AMMitch--
It wasn't illegal for the guy to fire the woman with the "Kerry/Edwards" sticker on her car. It isn't illegal for a private entity to discriminate based on political affiliation, especially when that political affiliation is inegral to the job position.
Is is despicable? Well, yes, but I've never been a fan of Janet Robert.
Posted by: Jeff Fecke at October 24, 2004 04:50 PMHmmm... I wonder if their station reps will be at the Minnesota Broadcasters conference at the Radisson Metrodome on Monday, Oct. 25th? The conference is hosting a job fair from 4:30 - 7:30 (free to job seekers). Perhaps someone should pay a visit and find out? (*turns pinky finger at corner of lip like Dr. Evil and prints resume*)
Posted by: NL at October 24, 2004 11:21 PMGeeze, like that was necessary.
Any Republican, no make that anyone with more than a third grade education, would experience a violent cranial fulmination within thirty minutes of listening to an Airhead America on-air "talent" up-close and personal.
Gahhh. I feel like suing them for mental distress just for having to think about it.
Posted by: swiftee at October 24, 2004 11:28 PMI've got no problem with it. It is the whole a private business and freedom of association thing. It is interesting that many right wing shows have producers and staff who don't toe the company line, and these shows don't suffer for it.
If a mass media company wants to forbid the voices of the masses, they'll cease to be a mass media company. Unless it's public radio/TV sucking at the public teet.
It makes us conservatives to see a liberal company doing something that they preach against against. There is no logic to this whole PC & diversity thing. [Unless you are a hypocritical Dem, of course.]
Posted by: Remy Logan at October 24, 2004 11:36 PMYeah, I didn't expect there was any legal issue with this. Just an ethnical one. And it's just plain gratingly stupid.
I've noticed a lot of government organizations and larger companies list "political affiliation" on their HR websites as things against which they don't discriminate.
Posted by: mitch at October 25, 2004 01:56 AMMaybe you are looking at it in the wrong way. Maybe it is not an employment issue, but a tax/election law issue. The fellow from cursor.org is big on policing conservative non-profits to make sure they are not being "partisan" (as opposed to merely ideological). This could present a similar target from on the left. If Air America is organized as a non-profit, then this could jeopardize its tax status. If it is a for profit entity, one could stretch and say that it is an illegal corporate contribution to the Democrats.
I would agree with the other comments that freedom of association should protect Air America, except that it should have said "conservatives" instead of "republicans."
Posted by: Peter Swanson at October 25, 2004 08:22 AMI think this sounds like a job for Mitch!!! go Mitch go!
Posted by: Eliza-beta at October 25, 2004 11:12 AM