Except, of course, that Bush may not have. (I'll stop short of saying he hasn't; the jury's still out. But he hasn't been proven to be telling the truth, either.)

Tell a NG soldier his service isn't honorable..., Tell any jet fighter pilot his job isn't dangerous - and at times life threatening -- see what it gets you. How can anyone -- no matter what color the sky outside their window, consider an admitted war-criminal, and pathological liar, a better choice than a level-headed, proven quantity as Commander-In-Chief?

This would be irrational Kerry hatred, no?

I look forward to the next lecture on how the left has it in for GDub. Because this Example A is the inverse of the most crazed Deaniac.

And my guy isn't even President yet!

Kerry has made his service in Vietnam the central fact of his campaign. He has talked and written repeatedly about his combat in Cambodia, the covert ops, the CIA agents, etc. Apparently none of that really happened. Now his campaign is retracting his statements. It directly affects the credibity of what he says is his primary qualification for being elected president -- his Vietnam service.

Nobody on the right is saying Kerry=Hitler or that he killed millions or any of the other crap the Deanics regularly spew.