The word for the day is "Arromediojeering".
Bear with me.
Doug Grow is a perfectly capable writer - in terms of actual writing talent, he puts Nick Coleman to fully unrequited shame.
And the Star-Tribune has many editors who are masters of their craft.
So one wonders how this column ever got printed. It swerves so far into self-parody, one wonders if the Strib's computer got hacked by the Fraters.
It's when you realize the answer is "no" that this article gets funny.
Grow begins:
Where's the outrage? Where are the political leaders? Where are the Minnesotans who used to believe so passionately in public education?And why would that be?The Minneapolis school board went about the business of again cutting the budget of the state's largest school district and laying off ever more teachers at its Tuesday afternoon meeting/wake.
These awful actions were greeted by apathy, mixed only with a little despair.
More on that in a bit.
Sharon Henry-Blythe, president of the board in what may be the most desperate time in the district's history, said she went home with an empty feeling in her stomach.Or maybe the endless...Hm. I'm looking for a word that combines "endless institutional arrogance", "enforced mediocrity", "hijacked priorities" and "misguided social engineering". I feel I need to find a way to sum up these concepts in one word, because the left has a hard time with concepts that take more than one word to summarize. For now, let's try "Arromediojeering". Let's start over."I keep waiting for some groundswell of anger," she said. "I keep waiting for people in the suburbs to join the people of Minneapolis in saying, 'Enough is enough. This is not what we're about.' "
But maybe it is what we're about. Maybe Minnesotans, once proud of the state's education system, have become comfortable with the idea that public education can take cuts, year after year.
Maybe Minnesotans got tired of the Minneapolis Schools' endless Arromediojeering. They tired of the institutional arrogance of the teachers' unions and the educational-industrial complex which resulted in ever-less learning for ever-more money, the enforced, one-size-fits-all mediocrity that public education has come to represent, the hijacked agenda that has the schools teaching values that many parents find repellent, and the social engineering that underlay the decline of the cities as well as the schools . At the same time, the system used the cities as a warehouse for the poor and using the schools to promote a culture of victimhood that makes the poor regard poverty as a virtue and victim status as an asset.
Y'know - the sort of thing that led the parents to flee to the 'burbs that Ms. Henry-Blythe so laments.
Bonnie Rosenfield, who for four years was a health teacher at Roosevelt High, was at home Tuesday night when she got her call from a teacher's union official.Assuming Doug Grow isn't projecting thoughts into "Bonnie Rosenfeld"'s head, let's ask; if that's true, why?"You're left feeling numb," she said.
In the hours since that call, a million thoughts have gone through Rosenfield's mind.
There were sweet thoughts: "I got a wedding invitation from one of my recent students," she said. "Something like that makes you know you must matter."
Thoughts of anger: She talked about legislative mandates from the feds that go unfunded and said there's little legislative support for urban schools in the Minnesota Legislature.
Because the schools, perhaps, have tried to set themselves up as a separate but equal level of government, perhaps?
Thoughts of futility: "It seems like there's very little appreciation for people in our society who work with kids. I just keep wondering: When is it that teachers became the bad guys?"They didn't. Their union, and the trite, trend-surfing, politicized administration they both work for and (often) support without question, however, are often perceived as the problem.
Doug Grow provides no reason not to.
And what-next thoughts. Rosenfield, 55, worked a dozen different jobs before following her longtime dream of teaching. She was a substitute teacher. Worked in a variety of capacities at Camp Snoopy at the Mall of America. Coached kids in gymnastics. Waited tables. Then the job at Roosevelt. Perhaps, she'll get called back, but at present there seems to be almost nothing to break the downward spiral in Minneapolis schools.Of course, this is misleading.This round of budget cuts was pushed by another drop in enrollment, this time an anticipated drop of 4,600 students. But Rosenfield rightly wonders if more cuts won't beget more enrollment decline.
The funding per student keeps rising. The number of students will drop, for inevitable demographic reasons. And, Grow's bloviations about the smon-pure motivations of the teachers and their bosses notwithstanding, the schools are a problem, and it's a problem that a lot of parents choose to avoid by leaving.
I say this as a conservative who was never much of a public school critic until very recently. We've been through this before.
It's the arromediojeering.
Here's where the self-parody shifts into high gear:
There were no silver linings to be found Wednesday at the Minneapolis teachers' union headquarters.So in other words, the system is:"Some are in tears when they call, some are frightened that they'll lose their home, some are wondering if there's a shot [at getting recalled]," said Louise Sundin. "We have to be honest. It's not like in the past where there was a good chance you would get recalled."
Most of the older teachers, Sundin said, have retired. Now 92 percent of the district's teachers have fewer than 20 years of experience; 80 percent have 15 years or less.
On the other hand, Sundin said, the downward enrollment trend hasn't hit bottom yet. Immigration, responsible for growth in the 1990s, has virtually stopped since 9/11. The NAACP lawsuit of four years ago resulted in the district losing about 500 students a year to suburban schools. The constant political pounding on the "failures" of public education has effectively undermined trust in public ed. Much of the new housing in the city is designed for older couples without children. Federal and state political leadership seem disinclined to do much but offer bromides.
"It's all very disheartening," Sundin said.I'd imagine.
Henry-Blythe knows the board is taking some heat for delaying school closures, a money-saving option that could have been taken last winter. But the political realities at the time -- people involved in schools slated for closing were outraged -- dictated that the board needed to move slowly in closing school doors, she said.Remember that? The professional public consciences - remember this? - felt the symbolic gesture of keeping unneeded but sentimentalized school buildings open was more important than mere money.
So - how many teachers' jobs could have been saved had Ms. Henry-Blythe and the rest of the bright lights of the Minneapols School Board had the guts to stick to their guns?
School doors still will need to be closed. But, "demoralized" as she feels, Henry-Blythe still believes that old Minnesota, a place where people cared about public ed, will rally.
"It has to happen," she said.I think they are rallying. But they're rallying for the good of their children; they're moving to districts that aren't failing experiments in social engineering, where mediocrity and victimhood aren't considered birthrights, where the union as the good common sense not to try to govern, where administrations aren't arrogant in their assumption of entitlement; 'burbs, private schools, charter schools, anyplace but the great sacred cow of the Public School.
Places with less arromediogeering.
Posted by Mitch at July 2, 2004 05:35 AM
Here in Washington, the local educational mafia, ahem, /union/, has decided to strike once a year in different districts to advance their agenda. They successfully brought a local district to a halt for three months before being forced back to work by a judge. The end result is that many seniors are going to have to wait another year to enter college and school is running most of the summer. The cost overruns killed several positions, and in the end the union successfully got all opposing board members recalled and the superintendent of eighteen months fired.
This is what comes to mind whenever I hear about the need to raise taxes to fund education. That and all of the administrative bloat that no one, not even the union, mentions.
Stupid expenses don't come from the union alone, however. When I was in high school, they were adding increasing numbers of counselors to help students. We the students thought it was a joke. Society already provides advocates in the form of parents or even pastors. Why do we need to fund programs aimed at a minority of the students when those same students refuse to do their homework?
Show me a school that has fewer than one employee per ten students, and I'll show you a school that thrives within their budget.
Posted by: Aodhan at July 2, 2004 10:02 AMNever been poor, have you? A poor mother who works three jobs because each of these three jobs pays so poorly and will not give full time hours with benefits has a child. The only guidance, support, and care in a trusted environment is in that public school. Would she like to spend more time with her child? Heck ya. Would she prefer to maybe not have had a child? Maybe, some days, but she loves her sweet child despite the fact that her good for nothin ex-boyfriend who fathered this child is long gone. He came over after drinking with his buddies with no condoms in his pocket that night eight years ago.
Posted by: amelia at July 2, 2004 10:38 AMYou have seen a very thin swatch of life my friend.
I heard the governor on Midday with Gary Eichten and he brought up another concern. Apparently the Minneapolis school district has something like eight or nine *hundred* empty class rooms that they are paying to maintain and that aren’t being used. If true, in my mind this is another case of “why don’t you better manage the resources you have before expecting us to pony up more”?
Posted by: PJZ at July 2, 2004 10:46 AMActually this (hypothetical) “poor mother” should have waited until she was married before deciding to have a kid.
Posted by: PJZ at July 2, 2004 10:49 AMHave I been poor? Yes. Grindingly so. With kids.
The stories would rot the enamel off your teeth.
Don't even get holier-than-thou with me.
Posted by: mitch at July 2, 2004 10:53 AM"He came over after drinking with his buddies with no condoms in his pocket that night eight years ago."
And you did ... what?
Posted by: kb at July 2, 2004 11:52 AM"Maybe Minnesotans got tired of the Minneapolis Schools' endless Arromediojeering; the institutional arrogance of the teachers' unions and the educational-industrial complex which resulted in ever-less learning for ever-more money, the enforced, one-size-fits-all mediocrity that public education has come to represent, the hijacked agenda that has the schools teaching values that many parents find repellent, and the social engineering that underlay the decline of the cities as well as the schools - simultaneously using the cities as a warehouse for the poor and using the schools to promote a culture of victimhood that makes the poor regard poverty as a virtue and victim status as an asset."
That sentence is screaming for another period, Mitch. I almost passed out waiting to inhale.
Posted by: kb at July 2, 2004 11:55 AMYour wish is my command.
Posted by: mitch at July 2, 2004 01:12 PM"And you did ... what?"
Sat and wished we had some friggin' condoms.
Posted by: amelia's boyfriend at July 2, 2004 01:26 PM