Of course they would be outraged. They are outraged that the Bush Administration "did nothing" to prevent 9/11; they are outraged that the Bush Administration "did something" about Saddam; they are outranged about everything, it seems, except the beheading of our citizens by Islamofascists.

The Dems are outraged because Bush was tying Al Queada to Iraq when the evidence is not there to support such a connection. No amount of lawyering about exactly what was said can change the fact that this Bush was trying to lead the public to a particular conclusion even though he knew it was not completely true.

For example one Thursday night I went out for sushi and then drank 8 or so alcoholic drinks. I got sick from the alcohol so the next morning I called my boss and told him the following, "I had sushi last night and I really don't feel good today." I knew my boss doesn't like sushi and would find getting sick as the result of my eating it quite plausible. I didn't lie to him per se but I surely led him to a conclusion that was not true.

This is why the Dems are outraged, they don't like being lied to at the cost of hundreds of lives. People in general tend to not like being lied to.