There's a better way to do it in the geek's world: it's called a 'Spambot.' I would normally never touch the things, but in extreme cases, I would allow the use of such a tool of Mass Disruption.

You have been authorized by a Class-A CCNA certified geek.

One quibble - Pelosi should be listed as the House *Minority* Leader. (thank G-d)

;)

My understanding is that some of those who voted “Nay” (I have no idea what Ron Paul’s rationale was) were upset that the resolution did not have language demanding an investigation (which has already been going on since January the day after the incidents were reported) and/or kangaroo-court style hearings. Even so, it seems pretty stupid to vote “nay” because you think something did not go far enough unless there was something in the resolution you found objectionable.

BTW: is the painting party still on? I’m looking at a house this evening and would be delighted to lend a hand (or brush) with yours on Saturday if you still could use some free labor.

I read somewhere that Ron Paul votes against every resolution as a matter of principle. This is one he should've abandoned his "principles" for. Jerk.

“I read somewhere that Ron Paul votes against every resolution as a matter of principle. This is one he should've abandoned his "principles" for. Jerk.”

Actually I would have to disagree. Much as it pains me to say this, if that is indeed the case, he is probably right that these resolutions are simple political grandstanding much like the floor speeches delivered to an empty room or the 9/11 Hearings (or pretty much any Congressional hearings).

However I doubt that Messirs Sabo and Oberstar as well as Madame McCollum have taken that position on other resolutions, so it’s fair game to go after them, for what it’s worth (which isn’t much IMNHO).

"Not that calling Betty McCollum does any good..."

Same goes for Sabo. Imagine how depressed I was to discover that he was the representative of the area we were to move into.