Sister Doin' It For Herself - A Pittsburgh woman with a concealed pistol permit ended the career of a serial rapist yesterday.
As the Instapundit asks - why isn't this getting all sorts of media attention?
The eminently sensible Eugene Volokh (a law professor at UCLA) says this about this incident, and its relation to the concealed-carry debate:
The debates about concealed carry laws, and about gun control generally, ought not, I think, be fought based on anecdotes, whether pro-gun-rights or pro-gun-control. One can only find out the merits of a policy by looking at aggregate data, plus whatever moral or constitutional logic that one thinks is relevant; in a nation of 280 million people, there are going to be isolated incidents that fit virtually any profile.All food for thought as the concealed-carry debate spools up for another run here in Minnesota. Posted by Mitch at October 15, 2002 09:52 AMNonetheless, I've generally found that even logically and empirically sound arguments work best if they also include some specific incidents as illustrations -- that just seems to be the way the human mind works. There are indeed plenty of defensive gun uses each year; there's a hot controversy about how many there are (the estimates range from just under 100,000/year to 2.5 million/year), but there certainly are lots of them. And this case seems like a very good illustration of this phenomenon.
And it's also just good to hear about, I think.