One group whose influence has always frightened me is Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Their absolutist views combined with their incredibly coercive philosophy on engineering society through their emotional - but often fact-challenged - approach to policy makes them both a dangerous and intractable opponent.
Instapundit links to some excellent articles on MADD's rather selective indignation, as well as some of their fuzzy statistics:
It cited increases in "alcohol-related traffic deaths" as its explanation for the low grade. The language that MADD used is important. "Alcohol-related" statistics include every accident in which someone involved had something to drink. That includes, for example, accidents in which a sober driver runs a red light and strikes a driver who had two beers and those in which a drunk stumbles out of a bar and into the path of a bus.And this article on TalkLeft steered me toward this fascinating, angry, info-stuffed site that pokes at some of the myths MADD is spreading.
Moore Problems - Andrew Sullivan's column in yesterday's Sunday Times of London sums up the current body of work devoted to fact-checking Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine - and the database of misleading and hyperbolic claims that's come from it.
(Via Talkleft and Instapundit)
Posted by Mitch at December 9, 2002 10:31 AM