Ahnold Verzuz Za Body- Got an email this morning from one of an Infinite Number of Monkeys, asking the Northern Alliance about comparisons between a potential Schwartzenegger administration and the Ventura years.
Lileks beat everyone to the punch:
"If Arnold is the savior of California, I guess that means that Jesse Ventura was his John the Baptist. He was the first to show that large blunt men with muscle-centric showbiz careers could assume the governorship of a state - but that large blunt men with muscle-centric showbiz careers could assume the governorship of a state - but that’s where the similarity ends. Ventura was incapable of projecting an easy-going image; he was too suspicious, too prickly. He loathed the media. He hated the establishment in all its manifestations. He was, in essence, a biker-hippie. He never knew when to pick his fights, so he picked them all."True, of course. Acquaintances among the press corps at the Capitol called Ventura one of the most difficult people to deal with in all of state government.
And, Lileks notes, that was a key difference between the two former musclebound actors:
Arnold is much smarter than that. It’s possible Ventura is brighter than Arnold, but Schwartzenegger instinctively grasps that simple truth Jesse could never accept: to win the game you have to play the game.All true.
There are other key differences, though. And it's a good thing, because...
It was into this ring that Ventura jumped. Why did he jump?
Of course, it was after election night that it got complicated, because...
How do we know? Did you see him on election night, the night of the "...we shocked the WORLD!" speech? He had that deer in the headlights look about him; that "ooooooooh, sh___________t" look common to people who thought they were mooning their roommates, but turned around to notice their girlfriends and their parents watching. More telling - although he ran as a libertarian conservative (promising lower vehicle and jet-ski fees, concealed-carry reform, and the surplus refunded at the rate of "$1000 for every man, woman and child in your house"), the moment he was elected he appointed Dean Barkley and Tim Penny - former DFL moderates who'd been attracted by Ross Perot's Reform Party's "Liberal Lite". They served as the wizards behind the Ventura curtain; the libertarian conservative candidate governed like DFL Lite.
And once the situation changed - the economy started tanking in 2000, halfway through the administration - and when it did, Ventura was only too happy to get out of the governor's office. It wasn't fun anymore, and it had the chance to turn into really bad PR for him.
Of course, lots of people are running as a lark, but they are unlikely to have the endorsement of the Republican Party.
And...
Finally...
In California in 2003, the situation is desperate, and Cali needs something neither Gray Davis nor Jesse Ventura ever were - a leader who can get a team into office that can sweep up Gray Davis' mess.
Jesse Ventura was a statewide practical joke that got out of hand. Whomever wins the recall will be in charge of keeping the world's fifth-largest economy from getting sold at a sheriff's auction.
NORTHERN ALLIANCE UPDATE: In addition to Lileks, we're currently awaiting Powerline's take on this. Fraters has yielded their time (it's the web, guys!), and the SCSU Scholars are still at their 8AM classes.
EMAIL UPDATE: Longtime Shot corresopondent JM writes
I agree with everything you wrote about Ventura's time as governor, but I think you and others discount how hard he tried to be a Good Governor.A fair point. I think he tried his best to reconcile "being a good governor" with the image he chose to project - the "biker/hippie" (thanks, James) populist who was out to kick ass and take names.
And while I have no problem with on the job training, I think he picked the wrong teachers. Tim Penny and Dean Barkley made Reform-y noises, but when you scratched beneath the surface, they were Democrat pretty much to the core - as Penny showed us during his campaign to succeed Ventura last year.
I didn't care for certain positions he took because they reflected his belief that Good Governors are centrist technocrats. His de facto rejection of his supposed libertarian beliefs was my biggest complaint.The road to Hell is paved with...er, light rail, I guess.However, like Wellstone, I have to give the guy credit for trying to do a Good Job. The people he hired as advisors were good as centrist technocrats go. And as much as I disagree with his promotion of the Light Rail boondoggle, I really think he thought it was a Good Thing, something that Good Governors support.
Unlike Wellstone, however, Ventura was woefully underqualified for the position. He didn't and refused to understand how political decisions are made and that the participants see themselves and their jobs as important. With regards to the press, in particular, this was his downfall.Ventura always thought he could lead with his chin, and his populist cachet would save him. With someone with a genuinely durable base, it might have worked. But I suspect most of the people who made their first and last visits to the polls to vote for Ventura probably weren't accustomed to calling or writing their representatives.
And you can't call people - like the press - "Jackals" too many times before they start to take it personally.
I think Schwartzenegger knows to dodge a lot of the bullets his pal Jesse tried to catch with his teeth.
Posted by Mitch at August 7, 2003 07:18 AM