|
|
Saturday, August 09, 2003
The Slow Drip - The Melbourne Herald Sun reports yet another possible Iraq-Al Quaeda link.
Not the first we've seen: "'Iraq agreed to provide chemical and biological weapons training for two al-Qaeda associates starting in December 2000,' the report said.
'Senior al-Qaeda associate Abu Musab al-Zarqawi came to Baghdad in May 2002 for medical treatment, along with approximately two dozen al-Qaeda terrorist associates.
'This group stayed in Baghdad and other parts of Iraq and plotted terrorist attacks around the world.'
The report, quoting the US State Department, also says the fallen regime of Saddam Hussein 'provided material assistance to Palestinian terrorist groups, including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Hamas and the Palestine Islamic Jihad'." At some point, we'll have to be reaching the "preponderance of evidence" standard...
(Via Instapundit)
posted by Mitch Berg 8/9/2003 02:59:16 PM
Distant Connection - He has a band and a website...
...so why is that unusual?
The person behind the site - Vini "Mad Dog" Lopez - has exactly one claim to fame: Bruce Springsteen fired him from the E Street Band in 1974, replacing him with "Boom" Carter and then Max Weinberg. Listen to any of Bruce's old records, especially 1974's "The Wild, The Innocent and the E Street Shuffle" - Lopez is distinguished by having less natural sense of rhythm than any drummer in modern rock history.
"Steel Mill" is an old metal band of Springsteen's, from the late sixties. It played its last gig in 1971, if I remember correctly.
This may be a record for flogging a tenuous connection...
posted by Mitch Berg 8/9/2003 12:22:25 PM
Limbaugh on Blogs - Back in the early nineties - when email was still pretty exotic for most people, and the web was still a filing tool used in research labs - Rush Limbaugh emerged as the most computer-savvy person on the radio. He was the first major talk show host to pimp his email address on the air, and use email as part of his show. He was the first major syndie to have a website, and to drive a lot of traffic to the website as part of the program. And he was the first I'm aware of (I had stopped following talk radio on a semi-pro basis by this point) to try to turn his website into a revenue generator.
So to call Limbaugh an old-fashioned dinosaur is stretchy; Limbaugh has been a leader at incorporating the Internet into his program.
Instapundit has a series of excellent links on the topic of Limbaugh's dismissal of bloggers (part of which is quoted here from Instapundit, from Limbaugh's site): "I treat you to my analysis of pollster Dr. David Hill's column headlined 'Bloggers Won't Match Limbaugh.' A blogger is a citizen who gets a website and just opines on various topics unrealted to politics. A friend of mine defined the term, derived from 'web log,' as 'a nerd with a journalist degree and no social life who spends most days and all nights writing e-mails to himself and his friends in hopes of attracting attention from traditional media outlets.' Andrew Sullivan is perhaps the best-known political blogger" Leaving aside Limbaugh's friend's character analysis (as Reynolds notes, "I don't know if Sullivan has "no social life" -- seems to me I've heard some controversy about his having too much of one"), he's got a point.
Blogging is very self-referential. A lot of bloggers are descended, intellectually, from the people who used to sit up all night posting elaborate screeds on Usenet. Many of us are people who'd like to be columnists, but don't have the option of starting our careers over as copyboys; some of us would like to be talk show hosts (or, in the case of Lileks and, well, me, used to be talk show hosts) but can't start over as disk jockeys in Havre, Montana and begin the process of eternal relocation, butt-smooching and relentless self-dedication that it takes to become a major talkradio personality. Blogs provide that outlet, and they do it for free, from the comfort of your den.
From there, of course, natural selection is as tough as it is in radio; getting a blog out of the "30-hits a day, most of them friends and relatives" ghetto is nearly as hard as getting a shot at doing a talk show. The free market rules who succeeds on the blogosphere, every bit as much as in radio.
So how does this relate to Limbaugh, and especially his attitude about bloggers?
Reynolds says:What's funny is that Limbaugh obviously feels the need to put down blogs, and to build himself up at their expense. What's he scared of? Blogs surely aren't cutting into his market share. They're certainly not.
I can think of three possible answers to this:- It's the Radio Law of the Jungle - Limbaugh started out as a disc jockey. When you work in music radio, you learn quickly; anything that siphons off listeners is something to jump on and extinguish. Music radio people endlessly analyze everything about their programming, looking not only to draw listeners, but eliminate anything that might cause them to tune out - how station jingles will segue into the intros of songs, or how many people tune out when DJs talk over song intros (versus the number that tune out when the DJ stops and the song intro takes time to pick up steam), or how many ratings book entries a DJ's air name will generate or lose - things so anal-retentive they'd make an IRS auditor shake her head and think "someone needs a laxative". They also think in terms of how they can counter their competition; "If WXYZ tends to play Christina Aguilera's new song coming out of the first commercial break in rush hour, maybe we need to end our break a minute earlier and play Christina first.
Seems like a stretch? It does, even to me. But remember - this is part of Limbaugh's psyche. That's how radio is, and it's how Limbaugh earned his living during his formative years; it's not much different than how he earns it now.
And while blogs don't siphon off listeners in any meaningful way (I've listened to Limbaugh while blogging, occasionally), if your outlook was formed in the music radio business, you regard any competition as bad. - For Ten Years, He's Been the BMOC - For a decade now, when the media talks about "the conservative street", the account usually began or ended with a reference to Limbaugh. Whether Limbaugh had any intellectual reason to want to be regarded as the voice of "the conservative street" or not, there is certainly a commercial imperative; every mention in the press is a bit of free publicity, the kind of thing that promotions people and PR agents slave at getting.
Now, a decade into the game, Limbaugh is getting competition; when the press talks about the "conservative street", names like Sullivan and Kaus and Reynolds and Lileks are popping up more often. Think the competition for mentions, or for the sort of mindshare that accompanies constant repetition doesn't matter to Limbaugh? See #1, above. - Pre-Emptive Strike - And while you're seeing #1, above, remember this; there are talk hosts on the market now that do leverage blogs, and are in tune with how this medium works. Hugh Hewitt's show calls on bloggers (and blogosphere staples like Mark Steyn) for a very large part of his program's content. His show almost sounds like an audio blog; de-centralized, skipping about between issues during the course of an hour, as heavily oriented toward guests as any blog...
...which is very much in counterpoint to Limbaugh's style; Rush is the only voice on his show (barring the very rare interview). The genre of talk that's built up around Limbaugh, ranging from the sublime (Jason Lewis, Michael Medved) to the ridiculous (Michael Savage) focus on the topic and, even more so, the personality of the host. The format of a Limbaugh or a Lewis or to a lesser extent a Medved show owes a lot to television; the hour, or the show, is a self-contained unit, produced to present the host and the content (in that order) as attention-grabbing-and-keeping units. Blogs - and shows like Hewitt, or as Lileks mentioned the other day, NPR talk shows - meander about, at the whim of whomever writes the material or stacks the 'cast. It's up to the reader or listener to decide if what they're reading or hearing grabs them enough to make them want to stay.
Is Limbaugh worried that Hewitt and the like are going to put him out of business? Of course not. Does he want to contest every listener who might find her loyalty divided? See #1, above. Rush Limbaugh reminds me of Bill Kling, founder of Minnesota Public Radio. In a way, their stories are analogous; both started in the provinces, and through skill and an overdose of entrepreneurial talent (Rush's in the private sector, Kling's straddling the non-profit and public) built the most successful games in town.
And the similarities don't end there.
A few years ago, the FCC started proposing granting low-power FM radio licenses, to allow people to set up tiny radio stations for as little as $1,000. It's as close as radio gets to Blogging; these little stations would allow almost any community group or school or organization to start a radio station with a range of a few miles.
Who led the opposition? Even though such stations would do a lot to evangelize the notion of "public" radio? That's right - Bill Kling, who saw these stations as potentially taking listeners, and money, away from big established Public Radio.
Does Limbaugh see blogs as a threat? Of course not - no more than Bill Kling can feel low-power FM will drive Garrison Keillor off the air.
Will Limbaugh fight, tooth and nail, to keep blogs (and blog-like media) from picking away the ratings and fiscal crumbs scattered about the edge of his juggernaut?
See #1, above.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/9/2003 09:54:20 AM
Praising with Faint Damnation - The Fraters take a whack at Jim Walsh.
Walsh - probably the toniest music critic in the Twin Cities today - has been a critic about town for the better part of the last fifteen years. He started at the City Pages (where he seriously classed up the joint after the abysmal Michael Welch), before spending most of the past decade at the Pioneer Press, where he brought a level of savvy to their music reporting that had not only eluded the SPPPD, but that the Strib's John "I Kissed Prince's Butt!" Bream couldn't approach.
Are Walsh's politics way off to the dippy left? Oh, what do you think? The Fraters quote a Chris Riemsnschneider piece noting Walsh's recent move back to the City Pages:Walsh sent out a mass e-mail earlier this week proposing a Paul and Sheila Wellstone World Music Day (featuring all genres of music) on the anniversary of their deaths, Oct. 25. Stop the presses - a music critic that trends left of center!
So let me be the first conservative blogger to say this: For a typicalliberalmediaflak, Jim Walsh is much less of a clueless disaster than most others (you hear me knocking, Brian Lambert?)
You can thank me later, Walsh.
As I do with musicians, I tend to ignore critics' politics; "Love the art, ignore the artist". If they steer me toward some good music, it's all a wash in my book, and if I wanted their political opinion, I'd grant them the right to have one.
No, Jim Walsh really only has one crime to answer for; the way he took the Gear Daddies - a wonderful, sparklingly fun live band with one of the best singers in the Twin Cities, Martin Zellar - and made their first album, "Let's Go Scare Al" such a dreary, aurally flat endurance test.
Other than that, he's not so bad.
Weekend Bloviation - I have a ton of work to do today and tomorrow, so I doubt I'll be posting much.
But it's one of those days when I'm noshing over a couple of big topics that could eat up a couple days' worth of space next week:- Urban Conservatism - Yesterday was just the latest of many jibes by the Star/Tribune at the Minnesota GOP's understanding of "urban issues". According to the Strib, the Pioneer Press and MPR, things like tax cuts, concealed carry reform, less-intrusive government and less-trivial law-enforcement are inimical to "urban" environments.
It's untrue, of course. But conservatives in the Twin Cities have a bunch of tall hills to climb; our party is just one of them. In my district - the Fourth - the party is split between the powerful, well-funded, well-organized suburban interests in Roseville, Arden Hills and Shoreview, and the frazzled, benighted party in St. Paul itself.
And yet it's here in the city that the GOP has the most work to do! And if you think about it, it's a place where by all rights we should be able to make a lot of headway. Who are the constituents? A minority group that dazzles the rest of the nation with their work ethic, commitment to education and free enterprise and family (the Asians), another that is traditionally tied to the nannystate that increasingly doesn't represent their generally socially-conservative Catholic views (Hispanics), and yet another that is just starting to make its disgust with the education system known, and favors limited privitization in the form of vouchers more than any other group (Afro-Americans).
So I'd love to talk about this next week. - My potential church hunt. It's a big deal for me - and has been for two decades. I'll talk about why. Probably.
- In his August 8, 7:45 AM, Pacific post (you'll have to scroll down to find it), Hugh Hewitt posited an interesting idea:
When do you suppose it will strike some producer at Fox or MSNBC that they ought to launch "Blogweek," hosted by James, Glenn, and Virginia and featuring three minute segments with 10 different bloggers talking about their blogs? Instantly a cable show would have an audience with the complete attention of the web and the opinion class.
Try watching weekend cable. This show would dominate the weekend ratings as surely as Arnold did the news cycle this week. The thought occurred to me a few weeks ago, although more as a radio show. I haven't had the time to pursue it, partly because I have been blessedly swamped with short-term contract work, and partly because I haven't done that sort of thing in years.
I think a blog show in the format Hewitt tosses off - a series of 3-5 minute talks with bloggers who are onto a hot topic for the week (or day), similar to Hewitt's whirlwind of guest interviews with interspersed callers, would make sense.
While Hugh suggests a weekend TV show, I have to wonder - would that make sense for bloggers? First of all, lots of bloggers have - let's be honest - good faces for radio. And the production involved in TV is the antithesis of the run 'n gun ethos of the blogs; the shooting schedules and just-plain-expense of doing a TV production would mix badly (I think) with the bloggers' style of doing things.
But talk radio? A couple of people in a studio, mixing in other people via phone or VoIP? Almost as easy as putting up a blog, and probably fits everyone's style (and the listeners' style) better, to boot.
Yeah, I've got some wheels turning.
- Is Arnold a good thing? More next week.
Plenty to talk about. I'll see you then.
If not earlier, of course.
UPDATE: Natch - I start out the morning saying "No posting this weekend", and then I start posting like it's a hyperactive Tuesday. OK. NOW I'm gone. Have a great weekend.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/9/2003 07:34:06 AM
Friday, August 08, 2003
I Was Going To Say... - ...that I'm going to be busy working on finishing up the first of two projects for a large local company that's paying me actual MONEY MONEY MONEY today, and that posting will be light...
...but it occurs to me that it's too late for light posting - I've already got an awful lot today, haven't I?
I'm going to try to finish off a game of phone tag with one (actually two) of my seven new leads that popped up last week. Cross your fingers for me.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/8/2003 08:33:33 AM
Far Too Wierd - My daughter, Daryll, turns 12 today.
I'm too young to have a junior high kid.
Jeez. I remember this night, 12 years ago, as distinctly as if it were a year or two ago. 18 hours of hard labor (with an hour or two break in the middle, thanks to the wonders of morphine), ending with a salad-tong delivery when the little baby, worn out by 18 hours of pushing, showed a big dollop of her future style, yelling "Come and get me".
Today, my little snoozing bundle is a thoughtful, grindingly stubborn, incisively smart, tall-for-her-age girl who's her soccer team's star defense-girl with a kick like an NFL place-kicker, on her basketball team's starting five, and is learning highland drums, just because. And it's hard to believe she's only with me for six more years.
Happy birthday, Peanut. I'm very proud of you.
UPDATE: My daughter and the Instapundit blog have the same birthday.
Both are equally good at responding when I need the garbage taken out.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/8/2003 07:48:14 AM
How's That? - In todays Strib editorial, the writer also notes:Residents of the Jordan neighborhood may be feeling slightly easier Is this a racist comment on moral laxity in the inner city?
Or is it just sloopy etiding?
The world wonders.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/8/2003 07:23:44 AM
City Talk - The Strib, in an editorial today, seems to have the answer for blighted, gang-ridden inner-city neighborhoods; more programs!
The recipe for violence, to the Strib, is simple:Gangs and drugs, unemployment and limited youth and family support programs set the stage for increased crime and violence. I'm a conservative - and when it comes to urban crime, I'm usually loathe to parrot some of the conservative dogma on the subject (urban conservatism will be a topic on this blog in the very near future).
And yet the Strib is missing a few key nuances to this story; namely, the role that unlimited youth and family support programs, along with Minnesota's notoriously lenient criminal justice system, played in creating the Gang and Drug problems. We'll leave aside the rather utopio-Libertarian notion of calling a truce in the "war on drugs", which is the biggest root cause of all.
No, to the Strib it's about money.Still, while it's welcome, the $200,000 commitment of state officers for a few weeks does not make up for millions in state cuts to local government. Minneapolis suffered a $33 million cut in state aid this year; $7 million of that total was trimmed from the Police Department. State cuts also reduced summer employment and recreation for teens, and training programs for young adults. That correlation is important: Low unemployment and ample activities translates into less crime. I'm not among the conservatives who scoffed at the Clintons' "Midnight Basketball" program - it was less noxious than most of the rest of the 1994 Crime Bill - but I think it's naive to think the hard-core bangers that have been destroying places like Jordan, in North Minneapolis, and the south side's Phillips, are going to be showing up at the rec center to be converted. Yes, providing incentives to play nice would help.
But during the high-flying, cha cha years of the nineties, money wasn't lacking (not in the sense any of us would recognize - the urban bureaucracy always wants more). Did the problem subside?
No, indeed, it peaked in the mid-nineties, and was only quelled by:then-Gov. Arne Carlson [sending] state officers and helicopters to Minneapolis after the city was dubbed "Murderapolis" for a year that saw nearly 100 murders. The Strib writer meanders around and around the point; in between calls for money, he/she notes twice that the only thing that's actually reduced crime in Jordan, ever, is an expanded, constant police presence.
Again - of course that's simplistic. You can't arrest a neighborhood into peace. There's more to it - just as there is much more to it than more programs.
More on this in coming weeks. Much more. Because as a conservative living in the city, the whole notion of conservative solutions to urban problems is not only fascinating - it's important.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/8/2003 07:22:07 AM
Liberia - Don't the editors of the Star/Tribune ever read their history?
Or even go to the movies?
In a Wednesday editorial, the Strib renewed the left's curious call to send US troops to Liberia - a nation embroiled in a war in which there are no "good guys", where every one of the belligerent groups is just as noxious and depraved as the last. Naturally, it's also a war in which there is no impact or even compelling interest to US national security. Naturally, quips TalkRadio, because it's the only kind of war the left ever supports.
Still, does the Strib editorial board realize the deja vu some of us are feeling here?At last, war-weary Liberians have a tangible glimmer of hope. The arrival of just a few hundred Nigerian peacekeepers brought a dramatic easing of gunfire and a renewed flow of humanitarian aid.
With 200 international troops on the ground and more to follow, controversial President Charles Taylor is now the major barrier to ending hostilities. He has promised to resign Monday and leave for exile in Nigeria. The sooner he goes, the better. When he is gone, his ragtag group of soldiers will have little left to defend. Reportedly he has threatened to stay unless he receives immunity from war crimes prosecution. Though he should be brought to justice, the immediate priority should be to get Taylor out of the country. Sound familiar?
Somalia was a nation full of factions, each as despicable as the other. And we intervened with roughly the same initial results - the shooting stopped for a while - and the same initial goals (ie, really no clear ones at all).
Liberia is a mess. It'll take decades, say some experts, to develop the things Liberia needs to stop the plagues that have bedeviled it for the past century; self-sufficiency, literacy, the ability to live peacefully in a multi-tribal society. And I've seen no evidence that the US is ready for that, rather than another bump 'n run peacekeeping mission.
It's about facile symbols, to some on the left:Reportedly, small groups of soldiers and rebels put down their weapons and embraced each other upon hearing about the presence of the international troops. Clearly, both sides welcome the peacekeepers and are ready to end this bloody war. Any bets on how long that'll last?
The Ad - As I noted yesterday, the "Gray Davis" commercial I heard was a Limbaugh production (and a damn good one!).
Tim Graham, in the Corner, talks about the Katie Couric interview that spawned the bit.
Checklist - Vodkapundit is fond of writing these sorts of "Life's Little Checklist"-y kinds of things.
Today's list - "50 things to do before you die" - is perhaps titled a bit aggressively for a guy who's forty and whose daughter starts junior high in a few weeks, but it's worth a look, for purely amusement purposes (no wagering, please):
50 Things To Do Before You Die Slum through Europe Twenty years ago this summer! Skydive solo without a static line - Someday. Drink your age in Jell-O shots - Vodkapundit must like to vomit a lot. Own a classic convertible - Had a Jeep CJ7 once. I think it counts. Total said convertible, walk away, and laugh - See #3, above Buy a bottle of the real Absinthe - Nope. Pilot an airplane - Not yet. Change careers - Several times, so far. Walk the Golden Gate Bridge - Nope. Have sex in public without getting caught - Mmmph Glrph Get caught Nope. Do something regrettable in Vegas - The only thing "regrettable" I'd do in Vegas is go there at all. Fail completely at something big - Oh, lordy, have I ever. Succeed at something even bigger - I'll let you know in a few years. Make a pass at a clergyman or woman - What if she wasn't ordained at the time? Have kids and love them to death - Check. But not literally to death. Change a stranger's flat tire - Check. Join an improv comedy troupe - Does the Don Vogel Show count? Build a fort - Many times. Ride in a hot air balloon - Not yet. Spend a day at a spa - Puh-leeeeeeze. Sneak into a movie - I can honestly say I've never stolen so much as a candy bar, much less a movie fare, in my life. Have a drink thrown in your face - Check Jump in a river/lake/ocean fully dressed - Hm. I think so. Win over a hostile crowd - Sorta. Spend a summer as a Renaissance Fair geek - I'd rather win the hostile crowd. Drive from coast to coast - Someday. Laugh because it hurts - Sounds like a koan to me. How about eating because I'm full? Eat at a diner called "Mom's" - Never even seen one. Look for buried treasure - Check. Learn how to paint - Houses? Check. Comfort someone who is dying - Not yet. Commit all seven deadly sins in one afternoon - Dude. I'm 40. If I have time for that, I have time to do laundry. Take ballroom dance lessons - I came very close, once. Smack Carson Daly with a brick - Bad karma. Buy a $500 bottle of wine - If we could split it 100 ways, sure! Drink a $500 bottle of wine - Yet another alcohol-related goal. This guy seems to have issues. Roll down a hill of freshly-cut grass - Check. As an adult Check Pilfer office supplies - Never on purpose. Get a pedicure - At the spa? Jeez, what sort of alternate-lifestyle hell have I dropped into? See a movie at a drive-in - Check. Get a tattoo in the Philippines - That sounds painful. 50 over the posted limit - Hm. Once, I think. Do something gentlemanly for a hooker - Er, yes, I believe I did. Long story. Eat all the green M&Ms - Check. Abuse your authority - Never. Be subpoenaed by Congress - Depends on the definition of the term "Congress". Try for four in one night after age 30 - Mmmph glrmph Sleep in until at least Tuesday - I'd settle for eight straight hours these days.Read the original to see how Vodkapundit stacks up.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/8/2003 07:18:16 AM
Thursday, August 07, 2003
Excellent! - This morning's call for opinions from the Northern Alliance of Blogs from the Infinite Monkeys guys brought out some fascinating stuff - stuff I've never seen before, in some cases.
If you haven't yet, read 'em all: Lileks' Bleat, Powerline's excellent comparson, a look back in Fraters' history, and the SCSU Scholars' exhuming of some fascinating quotes. Naturally, I had a ball writing my own contribution.
These homework assignments are fun.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 05:31:22 PM
Gored - I was going to try to find some way to tackle Algore's atrocious speech today.
Brian Carnell did it better.
Too many money quotes to even know where to start. Read it.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 05:18:52 PM
Dirty Pool - A rare listen to Limbaugh today nearly forced me off the road.
Rush played the new Gray Davis spot, targeted against Schwartzenegger.
The spot noted in grave tones that Schwartzenegger's father had been a Nazi Party member (although not a war criminal) and that he'd been cleared of charges of domestic abuse (When DID you stop beating Maria, Mr. Schwartzenegger?)
I'm not a huge fan of the recall - I think it's very, very bad policy in general. And I'm not a Californian (and I don't believe Minnesota has a recall provision), so my opinion is worth what you're paying for it.
But with an ad like that, I think recall is probably too good for Gray Davis and his campaign. They're clearly scraping the ground below the bottom of the barrel.
UPDATE: An email correspondent tells me the "ad" was actually a Limbaugh production - but that there is some sort of Davis "Arnold's a Nazi" spot in circulation in California.
Gack. Even when I'm wrong, I can't make it up fast enough.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 02:50:00 PM
Krugman on Suicide Watch - Well, he might be if we keep getting news like this.(washingtonpost.com): "Productivity - the amount that an employee produces per hour of work - grew at an annual rate of 5.7 percent in the April to June quarter, the best showing since the third quarter of 2002, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That marked an improvement from the 2.1 percent growth rate in productivity posted in the first three months of this year. Of course, until the Berg Consumer Confidence index rises above a 10, it's all just wind in sails.
(By the way - if you need a good GUI/Web Designer, GUI BA, Usabilty Analyst or any such...)
In a second report from the department, new applications for jobless benefits fell by a seasonally adjusted 3,000 to a six-month low of 390,000 for the work week ending Aug. 2. It marked the third week in a row that claims were below 400,000, a level associated with a weak job market. This suggest the pace of layoffs is stabilizing. Claims hit a high this year of 459,000 during the work week that ended April 19.
Both the productivity and jobless claims figures were better than economists were expecting."
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 11:22:43 AM
Ahnold Verzuz Za Body- Got an email this morning from one of an Infinite Number of Monkeys, asking the Northern Alliance about comparisons between a potential Schwartzenegger administration and the Ventura years.
Lileks beat everyone to the punch:"If Arnold is the savior of California, I guess that means that Jesse Ventura was his John the Baptist. He was the first to show that large blunt men with muscle-centric showbiz careers could assume the governorship of a state - but that large blunt men with muscle-centric showbiz careers could assume the governorship of a state - but that’s where the similarity ends. Ventura was incapable of projecting an easy-going image; he was too suspicious, too prickly. He loathed the media. He hated the establishment in all its manifestations. He was, in essence, a biker-hippie. He never knew when to pick his fights, so he picked them all." True, of course. Acquaintances among the press corps at the Capitol called Ventura one of the most difficult people to deal with in all of state government.
And, Lileks notes, that was a key difference between the two former musclebound actors: Arnold is much smarter than that. It’s possible Ventura is brighter than Arnold, but Schwartzenegger instinctively grasps that simple truth Jesse could never accept: to win the game you have to play the game. All true.
There are other key differences, though. And it's a good thing, because...- These days, Politics is Serious Business - Ventura was elected in 1998. Minnesota was riding high in the dotcom boom - we were no San Francisco, but the economy was thriving. We had had continuous state budget surpluses for most of the nineties, and there was no hint of leaner times ahead. Politics was a fairly trivial business at the time; the biggest problem the legislature had was whether to spend the gajillion dollar surpluses on new programs, or return half a gajillion dollars to the taxpayers. People had time for larks, for trivial political pursuits.
It was into this ring that Ventura jumped. Why did he jump?
- Because it was a Great PR Stunt - Everything Jesse Ventura ever did was for publicity. With his wrestling career over, acting was his meal ticket (it was for damn sure talk radio wasn't it); living in Minnesota, the only way to see and be seen was to create a splash. What better than to lead a quixotic campaign for governor?
Of course, it was after election night that it got complicated, because...
- There is No Way He Ever Expected To Win - Think about it; he was a former wrestler and actor, whose only political experience was a stint as mayor of Brooklyn Park (an older suburb of Minneapolis), running with the puzzled endorsement of the Reform Party with which he shared almost no common goals (and with which he broke in a huge spat right around his inauguration). He shot from the hip, because as an outsider he could.
How do we know? Did you see him on election night, the night of the "...we shocked the WORLD!" speech? He had that deer in the headlights look about him; that "ooooooooh, sh___________t" look common to people who thought they were mooning their roommates, but turned around to notice their girlfriends and their parents watching. More telling - although he ran as a libertarian conservative (promising lower vehicle and jet-ski fees, concealed-carry reform, and the surplus refunded at the rate of "$1000 for every man, woman and child in your house"), the moment he was elected he appointed Dean Barkley and Tim Penny - former DFL moderates who'd been attracted by Ross Perot's Reform Party's "Liberal Lite". They served as the wizards behind the Ventura curtain; the libertarian conservative candidate governed like DFL Lite.
And once the situation changed - the economy started tanking in 2000, halfway through the administration - and when it did, Ventura was only too happy to get out of the governor's office. It wasn't fun anymore, and it had the chance to turn into really bad PR for him. So how is Scwartzenegger different?- Times are tough these days - and as far as being a governor goes, no place is tougher than California. Nobody's going to seriously run as a lark.
Of course, lots of people are running as a lark, but they are unlikely to have the endorsement of the Republican Party.
- It's Not Like Arnold Needs the Publicity to keep his acting career going. The man's film career is as indestructable as a Terminator. If he survived "Jingle All The Way", he doesn't need a chimeric political race to keep himself afloat.
- He Could Win, and He Knows It - While Jesse Ventura - wild-card from an off-brand party - had to have known he was the darkest of dark horses, Schwartzenegger will be running under the banner of California's #2 party (although not every Republican is thrilled about it), is on the Hollywood "A" list, and has to have absorbed some political savvy from his inlaws (for better or worse). He's in a whole different league from Ventura. Personally, too - Schwartzenegger is by all accounts witty, urbane, polished, someone who can pass as a politician, who is wired in a way that might allow him to get some respect from the politicians he'll need to work with. He's the polar opposite of the loud, combative, just-not-that-politically-bright Ventura - closer to Ronald Reagan than to the Crusher.
And...
- If He Wins, It'll Matter. - Unlike Minnesota, 1998, the situation in California is beyond dire. Who'd volunteer for that job if he really, really didn't want to do something about it? The risks are huge - tackling the job and cratering would mean the end of any future political aspirations (Gray Davis stock is currently a strong "Sell For Pennies). Success, of course, would be another matter.
Finally...
- What You See is Fairly Likely What You'll Get - While Ventura the Outsider got to say pretty much anything he wanted (because he never expected to win!), and it all got retracted the moment he was elected, Schwartzenegger represents a party whose platform is fairly well-known. Granted, he's the far moderate wing of the California GOP, but it's less likely Arnold will be able to freestyle to anywhere near the extent Jesse got away with.
In Minnesota in 1998, a bunch of Minnesotans who rarely darkened a polling station came out to elect the class clown as homecoming king on a lark, at a time when larks were still funny.
In California in 2003, the situation is desperate, and Cali needs something neither Gray Davis nor Jesse Ventura ever were - a leader who can get a team into office that can sweep up Gray Davis' mess.
Jesse Ventura was a statewide practical joke that got out of hand. Whomever wins the recall will be in charge of keeping the world's fifth-largest economy from getting sold at a sheriff's auction.
NORTHERN ALLIANCE UPDATE: In addition to Lileks, we're currently awaiting Powerline's take on this. Fraters has yielded their time (it's the web, guys!), and the SCSU Scholars are still at their 8AM classes.
EMAIL UPDATE: Longtime Shot corresopondent JM writesI agree with everything you wrote about Ventura's time as governor, but I think you and others discount how hard he tried to be a Good Governor. A fair point. I think he tried his best to reconcile "being a good governor" with the image he chose to project - the "biker/hippie" (thanks, James) populist who was out to kick ass and take names.
And while I have no problem with on the job training, I think he picked the wrong teachers. Tim Penny and Dean Barkley made Reform-y noises, but when you scratched beneath the surface, they were Democrat pretty much to the core - as Penny showed us during his campaign to succeed Ventura last year. I didn't care for certain positions he took because they reflected his belief that Good Governors are centrist technocrats. His de facto rejection of his supposed libertarian beliefs was my biggest complaint.
However, like Wellstone, I have to give the guy credit for trying to do a Good Job. The people he hired as advisors were good as centrist technocrats go. And as much as I disagree with his promotion of the Light Rail boondoggle, I really think he thought it was a Good Thing, something that Good Governors support. The road to Hell is paved with...er, light rail, I guess. Unlike Wellstone, however, Ventura was woefully underqualified for the position. He didn't and refused to understand how political decisions are made and that the participants see themselves and their jobs as important. With regards to the press, in particular, this was his downfall. Ventura always thought he could lead with his chin, and his populist cachet would save him. With someone with a genuinely durable base, it might have worked. But I suspect most of the people who made their first and last visits to the polls to vote for Ventura probably weren't accustomed to calling or writing their representatives.
And you can't call people - like the press - "Jackals" too many times before they start to take it personally.
I think Schwartzenegger knows to dodge a lot of the bullets his pal Jesse tried to catch with his teeth.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 07:18:08 AM
Graceless Under Pressure - Howard "The Duck" Dean thinks civil liberties are something to be negotiated on an case by case basis, as events warrant, as this 9-14-2001 article shows: Dean said Wednesday he believed that the attacks and their aftermath would “require a re-evaluation of the importance of some of our specific civil liberties. I think there are going to be debates about what can be said where, what can be printed where, what kind of freedom of movement people have and whether it's OK for a policeman to ask for your ID just because you're walking down the street.”
Dean said he had not taken a position on these questions. Asked whether he meant that specific rights described in the Bill of Rights — the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution — would have to be trimmed, the governor said:
“I haven't gotten that far yet. I think that's unlikely, but I frankly haven't gotten that far. Again, I think that's a debate that we will have.” Now, Instapundit says that you have to give Dean a little slack - it was three days after 9/11, and lots of peole were saying stupid things.
Maybe. But this shows Dean's thought process when the pressure is on. That's important in a president.
Of course, had a Governor George (or Jeb) Bush said any such thing on 9/14/01, we'd be hearing about it.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/7/2003 07:17:51 AM
Wednesday, August 06, 2003
Grief, Inc. - This ties in nicely with the story on the Harvard study, below.
If you live in the Twin Cities, you can't go a day without encountering the extended orgy of mourning in which the late Senator Wellstone's supporters have been marinating themselves.
Now, as far as this blog is concerned, Senator Wellstone's death was an unmitigated tragedy. Like many conservatives, I have been just as up-front about my reasons for respecting the late Senator as I was about my differences with him.
But many of his supporters have been just awful. From the Paulapalooza, to the irresponsible conspiracy theories spread by everyone from run of the mill DFLers to Ted Rall and Barbra Streisand, to their endless, self-indulgent, self-righteous invocations of His name at every political turn, they're turning into the mirror images of the self-absorbed fundamentalists they themselves lampoon so mercilessly.
The trade in Wellstone memorial bumperstickers ("Never Park the Bus", "What Would Wellstone Do") is cloying and plays in cheap sentiment. Which is fine, but to display such melodramatic emotion and not expect a backlash, whether satiric or angry, is naive and just a tad solipsistic.
To get self-righteous about the backlash? Well, that's called "Laura Billings".
But did anyone expect any less from her? She plaintively asked in a column last week, "What happened to 'changing the tone' in politics?".
What, indeed?Nine months ago, having a green 'Wellstone!' bumper sticker on your car was like wearing a black band on your arm. For a few days at least, before the ill-fated memorial service made people crazy with partisan feuding, people walked a respectful distance around your grief. Interesting observation.
Yes, there is a time to grieve. But after a while, walking around clothed in black (unless one is a recent immigrant from, say, rural Mexico) is going to draw some comments. This is America. We move on, unless the deaths were a result of an attack on all of us ("Remember Pearl Harbor!", "Remember 9/11"), we tend to keep grief in its place.
But this isn't just your ordinary grief.
More on this below.Now, nine months after that plane crash, a friend of mine finds that her bright green bumper sticker and lawn sign have a rather different effect.
Regularly, she finds the words 'commie,' 'socialist' and others I can't print here scratched into the dust that coats her car. Twice she's been flipped off, for no apparent reason, by drivers with competing 'Coleman for Senate' stickers on their tailgates. Neighbors have started to ask, some in rather tactless terms, when she intends to take down the lawn sign she staked in her front yard long before the election. I'm not surprised. While I'm pretty laissez faire with my neighbors, I'd probably start rolling my eyes by now, too.
Picture a parent that loses a child. This engenders the most intense grief you can imagine (yes, Laura, worse even than the grief over Wellstone). Visible signs of that grief are inevitable, understandable, even healthy.
But if the parents are plastering the minivan with pictures of their dead child nine months later, people might be forgiven for mixing their sympathy with isolated thoughts that the bereaved parents might wanna get some counseling - right?
But people have a right to their feelings. They also have a right to their opinions.According to the latest political bumper sticker, people like her — and there are many — should just face the fact that "it's time to park the bus," a reference to the green bus the former political science professor drove all the way to Washington.
Put more pointedly, as another bumper sticker spews, "He's dead. Get over it.''
In a recent Associated Press story about the advent of such anti-Wellstone advertising around town, state Rep. Michael Paymar, DFL-St. Paul, called these messages "below the belt" and "highly insensitive.'' He's right, of course. It'd be right - if and only if they were directed at the late Senator himself.
But you'd have to be dense - or awash in solipsistic self-pity - not to know that the stickers have nothing to do with the late Senator. They are aimed squarely at his disciples, who nine months after the funeral are still flogging the electorate with Wellstone's sainted corpse.
He's dead! Let him rest in peace! More importantly, to quote that most irritating Democrat artifact, move on! Wellstone's legacy may guide you - but it is time for you Democrats to find your next living inspiration to get behind!
Remember the movie Ordinary People, with Donald "Kiefer's Dad" Sutherland, Mary Tyler Moore and Timothy Hutton? The family's older son dies, and the parents keep beating the younger son over the head with the elder's blessed legacy, and the younger son eventually tries to off himself because there's just no way to live up to the legacy of the sainted departed...
See where this is going, DFL?
Of course, in Laura Billings' world, there's just no way this is a DFL problem. No, it's those icky, talk-radio listening, blog-reading Republicans:And yet, I would also add, they're not all that surprising in a political culture that is increasingly characterized by its crudeness, rudeness and willful lack of respect for anyone who doesn't see things exactly as you do. She's referring to Republicans, of course.
I'm sure she's not referring to DFLers who think concealed-carry supporters are compensating for some sort of sexual inadequacy, or that balancing the budget is a plot to starve children and the elderly, or that conservatism is a psychological problem, or that conservatives are something to be libeled and silenced. This may explain the best-selling success of conservative bomb-thrower Ann Coulter, author of "Treason," a book with such a tediously black-and-white premise (liberals are to blame for everything) that even her supporters are starting to wonder if her ranting is getting dangerous. If you've seen her on television lately, and she's always on television, you may have been treated to a tirade about how Joseph McCarthy was, in fact, a fine American patriot cruelly slandered by liberals, or about how liberal pundits are actually mourning the deaths of their pals Odai and Qusai Hussein, since liberals always side with the enemy. Ms. Billings - isn't it "crude, rude and disrespectful", and doesn't it lower the level of our political discourse, to associate all of your opponents' thought with the most comically extreme example of it?
That'd be like my saying "Laura Billings? Pffft. This explains the popularity of this Democrat hate site".
Right?
Of course, I'd be "crude, rude and disrespectful" not to note that Ms. Billings does have at least one even-handed bone in her journalistic body...And no, it's not just Republicans or their supporters who aren't living up to their promises to "change the tone" in politics. Case in point: California Democrat Pete Stark. As Democrats filed out of the House during the recent pension bill fracas in Congress, Stark stayed behind, getting into a verbal feud with a Republican from Colorado who told Stark to shut up.
"You think you are big enough to make me, you little wimp?" replied Stark. "Come on. Come over here and make me. I dare you. You little fruitcake. …" Though Stark should receive censure from both sides for such a moronic outburst, I've heard more than one observer praise him for "standing up" for himself. Fair enough.
But it doesn't make up for the grating illogic or tortuously-derived conclusions at the root of this column.
Illogic?In such a spew-loving environment, it may come as no surprise that former Ventura administration apologist John Wodele, who in his four years with the governor developed a gift for calm understatement, was recently let go by conservative talk radio station KSTP. "I needed to be more confrontational, with a harder edge. But that's not me,'' he told media critic Brian Lambert. "Some callers go well beyond having fun with a difference of opinion." Woedele wasn't canned because he was polite and calm. He was canned because he was awful on the air,and got terrible ratings, and showed no signs of being able to improve as an air talent or ratings machine (which is what it's all about in radio). Perhaps Laura Billings can chalk Woedele's axing up to "crudity, rudity and disrespect"; it'd certainly fit her stereotype of KSTP's largely conservative audience.
But to tie it to the perceived disrespect for the sainted Wellstone is the sort of illogic that makes the worst of Ann Coulter seem pretty measured.
Did I say "tortuously-derived conclusions?"No kidding. And when bumper stickers start "having fun" with the death of a senator, his wife, daughter and five other good people, it's clear we've crossed the line from mere incivility to simple-minded cruelty. That people react incivilly and cruelly is part of human nature. It's a human trait that crosses all political boundaries.
But while Wellstone's true believers are entitled to their grief, and can suffer it as long and as tortuously as they want in their personal lives, their constant flogging of the Wellstone memory in public has long since turned maudlin and tasteless.
Billings comes perilously close to making my point:Maybe that's one of the reasons so many of Wellstone's supporters seem reluctant to get rid of symbols that serve as reminders of him. Because rather than seeming enraged by his opposition, the late senator was one of a disappearing political breed who actually seemed engaged by his opposition — energized and up for a fair fight. And the more invective and incivility that is heaped on Wellstone's memory, the more his amiably argumentative style seems sadly missing from the public debate. Right.
John F. Kennedy was a great influence on Paul Wellstone (and, indeed, on his opponent, Norm Coleman). Wellstone embodied much of what he himself admired about Kennedy. He even noted in interviews the impact that Kennedy's death had on him.
He didn't make Kennedy's death his entire reason to be. He didn't beat us over the head with the symbolism of the assassination. He didn't plaster that damn green bus with stickers saying What Would Kennedy Do? and Don't Moor the PT Boat.
He grieved, he learned, he moved on. He didn't roil with hatred over those whose grief ended earlier, or was confined to human rather than political grief.As these hateful, hurtful bumper stickers are beginning to make clear, people who care about passionate but respectful debate may have more than Wellstone's passing left to mourn. Yes. They need to mourn their own relevance.
And perhaps question the depths of their obsession.
It is time to park the bus. He is dead, may G-d keep his soul, and it is time to get over it.
Because, to answer the sticker's question "What Would Wellstone Do?", the answer is "put the grief where it belongs and move on".
posted by Mitch Berg 8/6/2003 09:41:19 AM
Luck of the Draw - There's going to be a very important drawing in California today, and it's not the Powerball:The California Secretary of State's office will draw 26 letters out of a drum next week to decide the order of as many as 400 candidates on the Oct. 7 recall election ballot on whether to fire Governor Gray Davis. With a ballot that long, name placement is crucial: "During the 2000 election, George W. Bush received an average of 9 percent more votes in California districts where his name appeared first on the ballot, said Ohio State's Krosnick. And position on the ballot matters most, he said, in contests where voters know less about the contenders. And the Cali ballot is truly shaping up to be a zoo:Comedy writer Bill Prady may run for fun. Budding filmmaker Art Brown may campaign for the publicity. And Thomas Laughlin, the karate-kicking star of the ``Billy Jack'' films from the 1970s, said he would run just to pick a fight with Arnold Schwarzenegger, the action hero 16 years his junior who will announce today whether he is running. Columnist Arianna Huffington said yesterday she will run. Her ex-husband, the former Congressman Michael Huffington, may run too." And on, and on.
Worth a read.
Your Tax Dollars In Action - Racism has held back African-Americans throughout history.
According to Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), the naming of Hurricanes is a vital part of this shameful legacy:The congressional newspaper the Hill reported this week that Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, feels that the current names are too "lily white," and is seeking to have better representation for names reflecting African-Americans and other ethnic groups.
"All racial groups should be represented," Lee said, according to the Hill. She hoped federal weather officials "would try to be inclusive of African-American names."
A sampling of popular names that could be used include Keisha, Jamal and Deshawn, according to the paper. While we're at it, we'll wait for Hurricanes Na Xoua, Rajiv, Achmad and Nguyen.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/6/2003 09:40:06 AM
Media Bias? Meet Academic Bias! - Power Line has an excellent piece on a Harvard study that purports to prove that liberal editorial pages are more balanced and less overheated than conservative ones.
The article is long, excellent, thought-provoking, and raises some very good questions about the "data" used to create the study.
Some of the best are from this set of questions about the study's balanced, cool-calm-collected author: "And what of Mr. Tomasky himself? If we are to give any credence to his paper, we must have confidence in his selection of 'comparable' issues and his subjective classification of 'positive,' 'negative' and 'mixed' editorials. Who, exactly, is this advocate of objective journalism, shorn of ad hominem attacks and strong language?
Well, for starters he is a columnist for the left-wing American Prospect magazine. Here is one of his recent columns, titled: 'Prevaricating President: Why Democrats Need to Seize on Bush's WMD Lies.' Here are just a few samples of Mr. Tomasky's non-partisan, ad hominen-free journalism:
'We're living in times that I don't even know how to describe....Under most normal circumstances...the Iraq War would have been a scandal. There are many reasons historically why war for a democracy should be a last resort....But when you bullied your way into office in obvious contravention of the will of the people, what difference does all that hoo-ha make?...And while Bush was in this serene state, he and his servants were out on the hustings selling the American people a story about an imminent threat that did not exist in order to gin up public support for sending young Americans off to risk death.'
So says our arbiter of what constitutes fair and balanced news coverage." Hindrocket's conclusion is a great one:Liberals who publish "studies" rely on the fact that virtually no one will ever read them. Liberal newspapers--that is, all major papers except the Washington Times and the editorial section (only) of the Wall Street Journal--will dutifully report the alleged results without questioning whether there are any data to support them. And so, who can deny that liberal papers are objective and measured while conservative papers are shrill and partisan? That's what a "Harvard study" has concluded. Just ask Howard Kurtz.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/6/2003 06:50:09 AM
Tuesday, August 05, 2003
Altered Context - Courtesy of Frank Rich - Paleojudaica points out that Frank Rich has been having a field day altering context - in this case, Mel Gibson.
Here's the quote from Gibson, as it appeared in Rich's column:Asked by Bill O'Reilly in January if his movie might upset "any Jewish people," Mr. Gibson responded: "It may. It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. . . . Anybody who transgresses has to look at their own part or look at their own culpability." Sounds disturbingly anti-Semitic, right?
Here's the original, with the ellipsis above replaced with the omitted quote:I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible. But, when you look at the reasons behind why Christ came, why he was crucified, he died for all mankind and he suffered for all mankind, so that, really, anybody who transgresses has to look at their own part or look at their own culpability. How long will the Times keep getting away with this?
posted by Mitch Berg 8/5/2003 12:18:02 PM
Satire? - Or not?
Only Scott Ott knows for sure.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/5/2003 08:05:04 AM
Call for Harold Stassen - Jesse Ventura says he juuuuuust might run for president: "Visitors packed a room at the International Wrestling Institute and Museum in Newton, Iowa, on Saturday to see Ventura, who was Minnesota governor from 1999 to 2002. He received the Frank Gotch award for bringing professional wrestling to a higher level through his work as a politician, The Associated Press reported.
Ventura said he will never say never when it comes to getting back into politics, adding that he might be interested in running for president.
'Now, that doesn't mean I'm announcing today or anything, just that if I were to get into politics again, that would be the only office I'm interested in.'" Hm. Talk show gig must be tanking again.
Note the section of the newspaper in which the article appears.
Trial Zeppelin - From Instapundit, this article in Opinion Journal by a former CIA director and a former USAF General has got to be giving Kim Jong Il indigestion:"Unfortunately, the reflexive rejection in the public debate of the use of force against North Korea has begun to undermine U.S. ability both to influence China to act and to take the preparatory steps necessary for effectiveness if force should be needed. The U.S. and South Korea must instead come together and begin to assess realistically what it would take to conduct a successful military operation to change the North Korean regime." That big just sets the stage for a forecast of what a military liberation of North Korea would take.
As Instapundit says, these are going to be interesting negotiations.
Remember - you can't give people just a little liberty. Kim is painted into a corner.
The "funny" part - and that's funny wierd, not funny ha ha - is that the left has been using the North Korean story to goad the administration from the beginning; "If you're invading Iraq because of WMDs, why aren't you doing the same for the DPRK?"
Watch for this on your favorite North Korean news source as things develop.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/5/2003 05:34:18 AM
What Give You The Right...? - Midwest Conservative Journal posts today on a subject much on my mind lately: The continued creep of many mainstream Christian churches into politics and away from theology.
MCJ's writer is an Episcopal. Or a soon-to-be ex-Episcopal, anyway. The writer points out a series of logical and theological inconsistencies in the Episcopal Church's views, and notes: "[Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop] Frank Griswold demands multilateralism in the first situation and dismisses it in the second. George W. Bush must listen to and take the counsel of the rest of the world. Episcopalians, on the other hand, don't have to consider what the rest of the Anglican world thinks or says or does about anything. The Episcopal Church delights in pointing the mote in the eyes of others while denying the existence of the beam in its own.
The reason for this is simple. The liberal wing of the Episcopal Church has no abiding principles of any kind. None. It is certainly not motivated by the Bible. When the Scriptures get in its way, they are higher criticized out of its way. It is not motivated by any allegiance to tradition. And, given the decisive vote against it at the last Lambeth Conference, it is certainly not motivated by denominational loyalty.
The Episcopal Church has become an entirely political organization pursuing entirely political goals. It will say whatever it thinks it has to say, even if it flatly contradicts something it said a month ago. And it has about as much interest in the afterlife as the Unitarians." I'm a Presbyterian, which is to Scotland what the Episcopals/Anglicans are to the English. They share certain traditions - and, in the US, they share an institutional leadership that is far to the left, and becoming more politicized by the day.
I was confirmed in the Presbyterian Church in ninth grade. In college, I took a solid two years to figure out exactly what I believed, and where and how I wanted to observe that belief - and ended up back in the Presbyterian Church. The church's beliefs are very simple, commonsensical, and tack no human dogma onto Christ's message; it is, in its way, the most fundamental of the denominations. Christ saved us. Go forth and live like you know it. What else is there?
But the church's General Assembly - the world governing body - is forever driving leftward. They heavily support the World Council of Churches. They're relentlessly PC; I can seen them following the Episcopals in recognizing gay marriage (for which I can find legal and civil, but no theological, justification, indicating to me it has no place in a church that actually practices critical theology).
My local congregation is actually worse. The pastor himself is a good enough guy (Presbyterians place a high value on good speaking - which I'm sure was one of the reasons that my speech-teacher father took us out of the dull, mumbling Lutheran congregation when I was 11), but there's a PC undertone that rankles me badly. And the assistant pastor uses her homilies and occasional sermons as a platform for anti-administration, America-last propaganda - and not just when there's something for an anti-American to talk about! No, she'll squeeze japes about the North Koreans we're starving into the call to communion!
So while I'm in the Presbyterian Church for reasons that are important enough to largely surpass human folly, I have my limits. I'm thinking about starting to look elsewhere.
So I may just blog about the Church Search as it goes along here.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/5/2003 05:33:45 AM
Dolt - From the excellent "California Republic", my discovery of the week Carol Platt-Liebau tackles the foreign-policy doltishness of Barbara Boxer: "Senator Boxer seized one final chance to wax indignant – this time about the proposed Pentagon program to create a market to predict future events in the Middle East. Her opposition isn’t too surprising – she’s apparently never been an ardent fan of free markets of any kind (remember her statement that Communism in Cuba was dead? “I hate to say it, it’s dead.”). But last week, she went over the top in her condemnation, telling Wolfowitz “There is something very sick about [the program] . . . terrorists knowing they were planning an attack could have bet on the attack and collected a lot of money.”
Well, yes, they could – and inform us about the nature and plan of attack at the same time. In the end, it would amount to little more than paying terrorists for information about upcoming attacks . . . not a bad deal, even from Boxer’s perspective. Given her floridly stated concern about “low-intensity” conflict, it’s hardly likely that she’d welcome millions of deaths in a terrorist assault that could have been revealed and prevented – but, then again, it’s so much easier simply to denounce the program (and enjoy that frisson of self-righteousness) than to make the effort to understand its logic. Boxer rounded out her attack by calling for the dismissal of those responsible for proposing the futures market program – a fitting punishment, indeed, for any government employee who makes the mistake of trying to be creative and effective all at the same time. But I can't feel superior. My congressional district is "represented" by Betty MacCollum - a woman who combines Boxer's dim-bulbitude with, if possible, an even more galloping sense of entitlement.
More to come. Read it all, OK?
posted by Mitch Berg 8/5/2003 05:33:13 AM
Monday, August 04, 2003
Tanks For The Memories! - This part of the NY Times article on how badly the Dems hate Bush caught my attention: Tom Rusk, a state welfare worker who turned out this week to see Senator John Kerry in Fort Dodge, Iowa, describes himself as "pretty liberal." He says he likes what he hears from former Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont and from Representative Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio, but he worries that both candidates could be "Dukakisized" in the general election.
What Mr. Rusk is looking for, he said, alluding to the infamous image that doomed that past Democratic nominee, is "someone who will look impressive enough at the helm of an M-1 tank." Hmmmm.
How do the current generation stack up in the TC's hatch?
Let's see... Carol Moseley-Braun cuts a pretty martial figure - if you're an entitlement warrior:
 Bob Graham could be a French tank commander...

Dennis Kucinich would make a great major in the medical branch. I'm thinking Frank Burns...

Al Sharpton may be a tank, rhetorically speaking, but...

John Kerry was in Vietnam. Did you know that?

Joe Lieberman...

Edwards looks more like CIA material...

Dick Gephardt actually looks like a general. In procurement.

And finally, Howard Dean.
Blood and Guts? Or Bloody Nuts? You decide.

So, Tom Rusk of Iowa - whatddya think?
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 12:56:47 PM
The News is the News - Powerline is always a great read. This post, on the historical context of the press' current reporting of the situation in Iraq, is above and beyond their usual high standard.
They note, correctly, that even in peacetime our military loses servicemen and women to accidental causes at a rate double the combat casualty rate in Iraq:"At the height of the Vietnam war, to which liberals longingly compare Iraq, an average of 40 American servicemen died each day--75 times the current rate in Iraq--and fatalities in World Wars I and II were far greater still. Yet in none of these conflicts was each casualty considered front-page news. ... It has become a political commonplace to say that the continuing casualties in Iraq will, at some point, become a political problem for the Bush administration. I don't doubt that this is true, given the tone of the news coverage, which suggests on a daily or near-daily basis that every fatality is proof of the failure of our effort in Iraq.
If we ask why the minuscule combat casualty rate in Iraq receives such intense publicity, while the nearly-equal accidental death rate there is almost ignored, and accidental deaths of soldiers in other parts of the world are never reported, there can be only one answer: the focus by the American press on every combat fatality represents a conscious effort to undermine the war effort and the Bush administration. Why else this sudden concern for the well-being of the American G.I.? Why else the ritual incantation: “...the fifty-third combat death since President Bush declared the end of major combat on May 1”? Why else the studied refusal to put the minimal casualties in Iraq into any kind of historical context? Why else do the front-page stories on every casualty crowd out objective coverage of the great progress that has been made in Iraq in an astonishingly brief period of time?" Well, we know the answer to that rhetorical question, right?
I have met very few media people who showed any signs of having enough interest in military history to have read a single book on the subject, much less evince any expertise in the field. If more had, more might have some means of knowing not only the historical context in which this operation has been so singular, but also the impotence (in the long term) and manipulation of the Iraqi resopnse:The only hope of the desperate Baathists and other desperadoes loose in Iraq is that the American people will tire of the war and the reconstruction effort and go home. The withdrawal of American troops from Somalia after casualties were sustained in Mogadishu made a deep impression on the Arab world, and serves as a model for insurgents in Iraq and elsewhere. And the Baathists would like nothing better than for Iraq to be perceived as a second Vietnam.
So the Baathists kill not for military advantage but for headlines, and American reporters and editors oblige them. Is it unfair to suggest that these parties work together for a common purpose--to discredit the Iraq war and the Bush administration with the American public? More to come.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 11:31:00 AM
News Flash, Part II - Satire? Or curiously accurate?
You be the judge.
Stupid Freeware - Squawkbox, my comment server, said I had until April to upgrade to a paid service. Then they cut off my comment service as of today.
Since I don't have the money to "upgrade" their service (and if I did, I'd switch to a different one), I guess comments are out for now.
Of course, the real solution is to install Movable Type. Gaaaah. The return of the install from hell.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 10:32:28 AM
News Flash - Democrats hate George Bush!
This, of course, has been a key theme of this blog since the day I first figured out Blogger.
The article is pretty normal NYT political coverage, complete with the casual inaccurate swipe at the president:There is a powerful disdain for the Bush administration, stoked by the aftermath of the war in Iraq [An aftermath that is only perceived as abnormally bad because of the slanted, biased media coverage, led by the Times!] and the continuing lag in the economy [which seems to be picking up steam, although don't expect that to make the story]. There is also a conviction that President Bush is eminently beatable and a hunger to hear their party's leaders and candidates make the case against him — straight up, from the heart rather than the polling data. But they have been! They've been making whatever case they have, and the media's been putting it on the air and in print, straight up and neat with no ice from the day Bush announced his candidacy!
It's not working yet!
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 09:37:34 AM
Bloodbath, Part III - Someone asked me in another regional forum - why was I harping so hard about last week's stories about concealed carry (a St. Paul man caught the guy who kyped his car using his permitted pistol, and a number of local bars displaying "NO GUNS ON PREMISES" signs have been robbed at gunpoint).
Simple - the Minnesota Personal Protection Act's opponents predicted dire consequences for shall issue at every turn; every fender bender was supposed to be a potential shootout; people would be mowing themselves, and innocents, down over the sort of argument they now supposedly settle peacefully.
Of course, that's been wrong in every other state that's ratified shall-issue.
"Show us that the crime rate is dropping", this person (who has always opposed shall-issue) asked. Er, that'll take a while; stats take a while to build up (watch, the Brady Bunch will blame that on guns, too...).
Here's why I harped on the incidents last week, which in the great scheme of things don't amount to a whole lot in the long term, the main point is this; the left lied.
No, a prediction that doesn't come true ("There'll be blood in the streeeeets!") isn't a lie. But a prediction made with the intent to scare people into adopting your point of view, all the while knowing that in the 32 states that went before yours in adopting the law had pretty much the opposite experience?
I'll be charitable; it's the sort of grossly-misleading attack that only a weasel would even attempt.
Told you I'd be charitable.
Anyway - I highlighted the stories to show exactly how disjointed from reality the anti-concealed-carry side is in Minnesota. And there's more to come!
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 06:48:56 AM
Feeling Strangely OK - Spent the weekend out of town. I'm mildly sunburned, but feeling relatively relaxed (as relaxed as I ever do, anyway). However - dozens of great blogging topics crossed my mind over the weekend...
...and kept right on going. I left my little reporters notebook - where I usually scrawl ideas as I'm out and about town - at home, as part of my desire to get away from blogging, job hunting, and everything else for two days. Well, it worked; I barely remembered how to get to my blog this morning, and I'm at a complete loss (as you can see) about what to write about.
Last week was good in the "great hopes for the future" department; as soon as I wrote this depressing screed about the last of my decent job leads tanking, more leads started rolling in. Granted, they were just classifieds and ads on Monster, but everything starts somewhere; the real point is, this was the first time I'd seen more than one gig in my general area (GUI designer) in play at one time in the last six months. I sent the biggest single flurry of resumes for actual positions (as opposed to recruiters) of this whole job search:- Two to a couple of local institutions of higher education, for positions managing their websites. Not really up my alley, but I think I could deal with it for a bit
- Two to a regional bank that needs a couple of "information architects", and whose IT office is about a five-minute commute (25 by bike) from my house
- Two to a local healthcare conglomerate (that I used to work for - here's hoping)
. That's on top of the three long-term leads I already have - one with a local financial services company that interviewed me on Valentine's Day, and wants to hire me - as soon as the budget is approved, which we've been waiting on for 5.5 months now
- A local consulting company where, as of early July, I was in the final three before they deferred filling the position until fall
- Another local consulting company that may or may not be on the brink of tossing me a decent little pile of work.
The suspense, of course, is killing me...
...which is why the weekend felt so good.
Anyway - back to normal this. Or, hopefully, better than normal.
posted by Mitch Berg 8/4/2003 06:48:36 AM
|
|
Berg's Law of Liberal Iraq Commentary: In attacking the reasons for war, no liberal commentator is capable of addressing more than one of the justifications at a time; to do so would introduce a context in which their argument can not survive

Best Shots
American Bankers and the Media
Tanks for the Memories!
The Untouchables
The Class System
The DFL Deck of Cards
For The Children
The Pope of Bruce
The Blogosphere Blacklist
Keillor, Again
Open Letter to Keillor
More...
Articles
Links

The Northern Alliance of Blogs
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Powerline
SCSU Scholars
and the Commish
Blogs
Big Media
Frankfurter Allgemeine
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Minneapolis Star/Tribune
Jamestown Sun
Niche Media
Reason
Center for the American Experiment
National Review Online
Drudge
Backstreets
WSJ's OpinionJournal
Toquevillian
Other Blogs from my Kids and I
Daryll's "Horses and Orlando"
Sam's "Comic Post"
Rock's So Tough - the Iron City Houserockers
Mental Shrapnel
Ian Whitney's MN Bloggers
Day By Day
Bureaucrash
CuriousFurious
MN Concealed Carry Reform Now
The Onion
James Randi Educational Foundation
The Self-Made Critic
Book of Ratings
Current Issue
Archives
Contact Me!
 Support democracy and human rights in Iraq!


Everything on this site (c) Mitch Berg. All
non-quoted opinions are mine.
visitors, more or less, since 9/13/03
|