{"id":9293,"date":"2010-04-08T12:00:59","date_gmt":"2010-04-08T17:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=9293"},"modified":"2010-04-09T06:53:39","modified_gmt":"2010-04-09T11:53:39","slug":"i-extremist-limited-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=9293","title":{"rendered":"I, Extremist, Part V"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>According to Janet Napolitano and most of the mainstream media, I&#8217;m an &#8220;extremist&#8221;; I&#8217;m pro-life, anti-tax, pro-Second-and-Tenth Amendment&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;which, to some, means &#8220;anti-government&#8221;; as if &#8220;wanting just the parts of government we really need&#8221; is in some way the same as wanting the government to be overthrown.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s one of my &#8220;extremist&#8221; beliefs; that the government that governns best, governs least.\u00a0 Of course, that was really Thomas Jefferson &#8211; who, let&#8217;s never forget, was also an extremist.<\/p>\n<p>Look &#8211; most of the case for limited government boils down to this:\u00a0 The Constitution really defines what government is supposed to do; defend the nation, look out for the &#8220;general welfare&#8221;, raise taxes <em>for federal functions <\/em>(which at one point meant &#8220;functions that were properly the province of the Feds, although that&#8217;s been bastardized beyond recognition for the past couple of generations), \u00a0sign treaties with foreign governments, interpret the Constitution and, since the end of the Civil War, make sure that &#8220;equality before the law&#8221; is a unform, national thing; above all, per the Tenth Amendment, to keep its hands <em>off <\/em>of everything else.<\/p>\n<p>But you can hear that from the entire Libertarian Party, and a fair chunk of the libertarian wing of the GOP; that&#8217;s Conservatism 101 (or, if you&#8217;re talking with Keith Olberman or Nancy Pelosi or Janet Napolitano, &#8220;extremism&#8221;, but I digress).<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s another, ethical reason to limit the size and power of government.\u00a0 It does in unbendable fact what capitalism supposedly does; it arbitrarily picks winners.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine that you&#8217;re a barber.\u00a0 You live in, let&#8217;s say, Portland, Oregon, a city with nine other barbers.\u00a0 Now, being plagued with hippies, it&#8217;s not the best town to be a barber.\u00a0 But you get word that the guys from Phish are going to all get flattops; knowing what a bunch of &#8220;non-conformists&#8221; hippies are, you and your nine fellow barbers are getting ready for an avalanche of business.<\/p>\n<p>As one of your items of business, you set up a PAC &#8211; call it &#8220;Portland Cares about Hair&#8221;.\u00a0 You publicize photos of bad flat-tops.\u00a0 &#8220;Portland must demand better&#8221;, the ads say.\u00a0 And you go before the Portland City <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">Commissariat<\/span> Council, and convince them that bad flat-tops are something that government must prevent &#8211; so they should impose a license on the barber trade, with licenses going to would-be\u00a0barbers who have passed a license exam issued by the &#8220;Board of Barber Examiners&#8221; &#8211; a panel of three barbers drawn from among the ten of you.\u00a0 Which means that, as the hordes of hippies wander about looking for flat-tops, there are only ten shops to go to; all of the hippies who try to start their own barber shops are busted by the cops and fined for &#8220;barbering without a license&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, you and your nine barber friends have just used government to give you a better, more commanding market position.<\/p>\n<p>Business does this all the time; the bigger the business, the bigger the likelihood they&#8217;ll get government to clamp down on the market for them:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Yes, that&#8217;s the largest investment bank on Wall Street calling for stricter regulation from Washington. Stoll has a pretty straightforward explanation:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What [Goldman CEO Lloyd] Blankfein and Mr. Cohn are now saying is that their desire for higher capital requirements isn&#8217;t related to concern about their ability to control <em>Goldman<\/em>&#8216;s risk-taking (&#8220;Please, Mr. Government, supervise me more closely, allow me to borrow less money, and force me to take less risk&#8221;), but their ability to assess and judge the risks of their <em>counterparties<\/em>, the other firms they are doing deals with.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Why should Goldman have to pay for mitigating the risk of its deal-partners when the SEC or the Fed can do Goldman&#8217;s work for it &#8212; on the taxpayer dime?<\/p>\n<p>This is further evidence of <a href=\"https:\/\/http\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/opinion\/columns\/Beware-the-Goldman-Sachs-populist-82293977.html\">what I&#8217;ve been saying<\/a> for months: just as tobacco regulation was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/politics\/Obama-teams-with-Philip-Morris-to-beat-tobacco-industry_06_24-48935107.html\">a gift to Philip Morris<\/a>, toy regulation was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lewrockwell.com\/orig\/tcarney4.1.1.html\">a gift to Mattel<\/a>, and health-care &#8220;reform&#8221; was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/politics\/Obama-gives-sugar-plums-to-the-special-interests-88958037.html\">a gift to Big Pharma<\/a>, financial reform will improve Goldman&#8217;s profitability, Obama&#8217;s populist rhetoric notwithstanding.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Government has no more business picking winners than it has defining who shall lose.\u00a0 At least, it shouldn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>I know.\u00a0 What an extremist I am.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to Janet Napolitano and most of the mainstream media, I&#8217;m an &#8220;extremist&#8221;; I&#8217;m pro-life, anti-tax, pro-Second-and-Tenth Amendment&#8230; &#8230;which, to some, means &#8220;anti-government&#8221;; as if &#8220;wanting just the parts of government we really need&#8221; is in some way the same as wanting the government to be overthrown. Here&#8217;s one of my &#8220;extremist&#8221; beliefs; that the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservatism","category-liberty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9293"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9937,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9293\/revisions\/9937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}