{"id":4398,"date":"2009-03-16T07:36:37","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T12:36:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4398"},"modified":"2009-03-16T12:42:23","modified_gmt":"2009-03-16T17:42:23","slug":"the-question-bob-garfield-missed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4398","title":{"rendered":"Garfield Buries The Lede"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve long held that &#8220;Codes of Journalistic Ethics&#8221; aren&#8217;t ethics codes in the sense that laypeople understand, but merely frameworks to allow journalists to justify bad behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, National Public Radio&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=garfield+gladstone+site%3Awww.shotinthedark.info&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a\">On The Media<\/a>&#8221; seems to exist primarily to give a big, fat &#8220;attaboy&#8221; to liberal bias in the media.<\/p>\n<p>Over the weekend, OTM host Bob Garfield\u00a0did an interview (of sorts) with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.onthemedia.org\/transcripts\/2009\/03\/13\/04\">one of the editors of the <em>Wikileaks <\/em>website.<\/a> <em>Wikileaks<\/em> oozed its way into Minnesota political life this past week by publishing&#8230;well, we&#8217;ll get back to that.<\/p>\n<p>From OTM&#8217;s website:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The site Wikileaks posts leaked documents from anonymous whistleblowers worldwide, even if those documents pose a danger or could potentially lead to loss of life. Julian Assange, the site&#8217;s investigations editor, explains why Wikileaks publishes almost anything it receives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The story (which you should listen to, if you haven&#8217;t already) mentions the Coleman incident &#8211; Garfield notes that the &#8220;whistleblowing&#8221; involved revealing the names and other personal data of 52,000 people &#8211; but focuses more on <em>Wikileaks&#8217; <\/em>version of &#8220;journalism&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The interview with Mr. Assange focuses mainly on <em>Wikileaks&#8217; <\/em>perceived justification for broadcasting leaks, as well as for doing it largely anonymously.\u00a0 That is, of course, a subject for an upper-division J-school seminar.<\/p>\n<p>But Garfield missed the question that I suspect a lot of people would love to ask Mr. Assange:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mr. Assange:\u00a0 Imagine if you will a story about a serial rapist.\u00a0 The story mentions the serial rapist, but focuses entirely on identifying the rapist&#8217;s victims and digging up personal dirt about them.\u00a0 Is that good journalism?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Of course not.\u00a0 Now &#8211; since <em>Wikileaks<\/em> claims to be &#8220;journalism&#8221;, tell me; if the &#8220;story&#8221; your &#8220;whistleblower&#8221; claimed to have uncovered was the security bobble with Coleman&#8217;s website, why were the identies of the 50,000-odd victims any more relevant than the identies of the rape victims?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Of course\u00a0 <\/em>you can&#8217;t answer that question.\u00a0 Because for all you talk about being true journalists, you&#8217;re nothing but a bunch of ideology-driven intellectual vandals, hiding behind a label that you only recognize the most self-serving, solopsistic aspects of&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>That would have made it a good story.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve long held that &#8220;Codes of Journalistic Ethics&#8221; aren&#8217;t ethics codes in the sense that laypeople understand, but merely frameworks to allow journalists to justify bad behavior. Likewise, National Public Radio&#8217;s &#8220;On The Media&#8221; seems to exist primarily to give a big, fat &#8220;attaboy&#8221; to liberal bias in the media. Over the weekend, OTM host [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-minnesota-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}