{"id":34808,"date":"2013-03-05T12:00:17","date_gmt":"2013-03-05T18:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=34808"},"modified":"2014-10-02T10:19:18","modified_gmt":"2014-10-02T15:19:18","slug":"the-unions-buy-minnesota","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=34808","title":{"rendered":"The Unions Buy Minnesota"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So how much money\u00a0<em>did\u00a0<\/em>Big Labor spend along with Big Lefty Plutocrat to buy the Governor&#8217;s Office and the Legislature?<\/p>\n<p>If you believe the\u00a0<em>Strib<\/em>, it&#8217;s &#8220;around $3 million.<\/p>\n<p>If you believe the\u00a0<em>Strib\u00a0<\/em>is going to tell the truth about DFL perfidy &#8211; and especially the big money behind the DFL, I&#8217;ve got a 50% stake in the next Lindsay Lohan movie to sell you.<\/p>\n<p>Bill Walsh, long-time Minnesota political operative, did a little digging into the story &#8211; and he&#8217;s got something the Twin Cities&#8217; mainstream media doesn&#8217;t want to give you; the facts:<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m publishing his piece as a guest writer at Shot In The Dark today.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<h2>Unions Spent $11.1 Million in 2012 to Buy Friendly Legislature for Gov. Mark Dayton<\/h2>\n<p>Bill Walsh,\u00a0<em>Shot In The Dark\u00a0<\/em>Guest Writer<\/p>\n<p>A few weeks ago the Star Tribune published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=34680\">an article about campaign spending in the 2012 election focusing on two big individual donors<\/a> \u2013 Alida Messinger and Bob Cummins. The conclusion? Each party has a big donor that gave lots of money, it\u2019s all a wash. I\u2019m afraid this story is all we\u2019re going to get from the Strib on campaign spending analysis. Today, in an otherwise well written article on union influence at the capitol this year, Rachel Stassen-Berger writes that unions \u201cput at least $3 million into elections.\u201d I guess $11.1 million is \u201cat least\u201d $3 million. She\u2019s only off by $8.1 million.<\/p>\n<p>I took the time to go through the campaign finance reports of 111 different union organizations in Minnesota and nationally for the 2012 election. Spending ranged from Education Minnesota at $1.8 million to the Bemidji Central Labor Body AFL-CIO Political Fund at $250. State and local unions accounted for $9.1 million in campaign spending with national unions kicking in the other $2 million.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;\"><a style=\"text-decoration: underline;\" title=\"View Union Contributions 2012 on Scribd\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/128679897\/Union-Contributions-2012\">Union Contributions 2012<\/a> by<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"doc_32654\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/embeds\/128679897\/content?start_page=1&amp;view_mode=scroll\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"100%\" height=\"600\" data-auto-height=\"false\" data-aspect-ratio=\"undefined\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>It took some time to come to the right numbers because many unions give money to each other for joint spending initiatives. These numbers reflect the net spending after backing out contributions between unions. It goes without saying that over 99% of the money went to DFL candidates and causes.<\/p>\n<p>I blame myself for not getting this research to the StarTribune before they published today\u2019s article. It really would have added some punch to their story.<\/p>\n<p>For example, when talking about the nurses union asking the legislature for new staffing ratios that will drive up health care costs, it would have been useful to point out to readers the nurses union spent over $500,000 helping DFL candidates win back the legislature last year. As a matter of fact, that probably should be mentioned every time the media covers the progress of this legislation.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, when discussing AFSCME\u2019s attempt to force unionization on small private childcare businesses, it would inform the reader to mention that seven different AFSCME organizations gave a total of $1.6 million to DFL candidates and causes in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>The list goes on \u2013 Education Minnesota is trying to resurrect their statewide insurance pool legislation, MAPE and AFSCME are getting new generous employment contracts, the minimum wage is being increased and Dayton is following through on his promise to raise taxes on the rich.<\/p>\n<p>But business spends a lot too, right? Wrong. It\u2019s hard to get anywhere near $11.1 million if you add up the business money spent in the 2012 election. A business friendly PAC called Minnesota\u2019s Future spent $1.2 million while the Chamber of Commerce-supported Coalition for Minnesota Businesses spent just $283,000 on the 2012 election. We all know the MNGOP received little support from the business community and the two legislative caucuses combined to spend only $4.1 million, and not all of that can be attributed to business.<\/p>\n<p>According to today\u2019s Pioneer Press, however, business interests do spend a lot on lobbying. The Campaign Finance Board reported that business interests spent $17.4 million lobbying the legislature during the 2011 session.<\/p>\n<p>This may be the key to understanding today\u2019s political environment. Unions spend heavily getting sympathetic Democrats elected to office. Once they are in place, it doesn\u2019t take much money to lobby \u2013the jury is already selected.<\/p>\n<p>Business on the other hand, spends relatively little on the nuts and bolts of campaigns and prefers to hire lobbyists to try to influence the debate after the legislature has been selected.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s next?<\/p>\n<p>First, Republican legislators need to hammer away on the $11.1 million unions spent to buy this legislature for Gov. Mark Dayton. They need to remind the public and the press at every opportunity to follow the money. Pay to play has never been more obvious in Minnesota.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the business community needs to shift some of its resources to where it matters: the 2014 general election. Business will never match the collective self interest and desperation of the unions, so we need to reach a higher level of cooperation if we hope to recapture the House and win back the governor\u2019s office in 2014.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>MITCH ADDS: \u00a0More on this in coming weeks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So how much money\u00a0did\u00a0Big Labor spend along with Big Lefty Plutocrat to buy the Governor&#8217;s Office and the Legislature? If you believe the\u00a0Strib, it&#8217;s &#8220;around $3 million. If you believe the\u00a0Strib\u00a0is going to tell the truth about DFL perfidy &#8211; and especially the big money behind the DFL, I&#8217;ve got a 50% stake in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[119,144,130,2,132],"tags":[312],"class_list":["post-34808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-election-integrity","category-governor","category-tc-media-bias","category-minnesota-politics","category-mn-legislature","tag-mngov-2010"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=34808"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34810,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34808\/revisions\/34810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=34808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=34808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=34808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}