{"id":17821,"date":"2011-02-02T08:12:09","date_gmt":"2011-02-02T14:12:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=17821"},"modified":"2014-11-28T04:43:04","modified_gmt":"2014-11-28T10:43:04","slug":"buying-minnesota-with-daddys-money-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=17821","title":{"rendered":"Buying Minnesota With Daddy&#8217;s Money, Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, the Campaign Finance reports for the last Gubernatorial election came out.<\/p>\n<p>And the media finally noticed &#8211; sort of &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=12083\">what you learned on this blog last July<\/a>; Mark Dayton outspent Tom Emmer 2:1, and that most of the money came from &#8220;outside groups&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>MPR had\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/minnesota.publicradio.org\/display\/web\/2011\/02\/01\/dayton-labor-donors\/\">the best report<\/a>, at least compared to the rest of the Twin Cities media:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Democrat Mark Dayton and his allies spent significantly more than Republican Tom Emmer and his allies to win the race for Minnesota governor.<\/p>\n<p>Alliance for a Better Minnesota, a group working to elect Dayton, spent $5.7 million in the race, helped by big contributions from labor unions and Dayton&#8217;s family. Most of Alliance&#8217;s money was spent on ads criticizing Emmer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Most of&#8221; it. \u00a0Heh.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to add some emphasis here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Labor unions spent more than $2.2 million<\/strong> to help elect Dayton, with money coming in both before the election and afterward to help the recount effort. The Democratic Governor&#8217;s Association spent $1 million, and <strong>Dayton&#8217;s family and his ex-wife gave more than $900,000<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Tom Scheck&#8217;s piece yesterday included a sound bite from Ken Martin, the head of &#8220;Win Minnesota&#8221;, a PAC that funneled money to &#8220;Alliance For A Better Minnesota&#8221; (ABM):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Ken Martin, who ran the umbrella group that financed The Alliance for a Better Minnesota, says donors were energized to elect the first Democrat to the governor&#8217;s office since 1986.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> &#8220;People invest in politics on all sides, and it&#8217;s not for any other purpose than to support the candidates that they feel are going to best represent what they believe in,&#8221; said Martin. &#8220;Frankly, the payoff is a better Minnesota, and they believe Mark Dayton was the candidate to make that happen.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Martin&#8217;s statement implies that there was some huge groundswell of grassroots financial support in $20 and $50 donations from Ma and Pa Minnesota. \u00a0There was not; the money to run Dayton&#8217;s sleazy smear campaign came from big institutional donors, national Democrat sources, and Dayton and his family.<\/p>\n<p>More emphasis added below:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Alliance for a Better Minnesota outspent the two groups backing Emmer &#8212; MN Forward and Minnesota&#8217;s Future. Minnesota&#8217;s Future, funded mostly by the Republican Governor&#8217;s Association, spent $<strong>1.4 million<\/strong> on the race. MN Forward, who received contributions from businesses like Target and Best Buy, spent nearly $<strong>1.8 million.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Catch that? \u00a0That, of course, is why the DFL spent six months caterwauling (with the help of their kissin&#8217; cousins in the media) about the &#8220;corrosive effects of <em>corporate <\/em>money in politics&#8221; \u00a0Minnesota business managed to contribute all of 2\/3 what unions did.<\/p>\n<p>Can&#8217;t have that, can we?<\/p>\n<p>By the way, it&#8217;s interesting that business donated $1.8 million to the conservative, pro-business Emmer, while&#8230;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On the DFL side, companies including Kwik Trip, Anheuser-Busch, Pfizer and SuperValu gave a total of $<strong>88,000<\/strong> to groups helping to elect Dayton and support him during the recount.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Unfortunately, I already patronize none of these companies.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dayton&#8217;s campaign also outspent Emmer&#8217;s. Dayton spent $5.3 million in 2009 and 2010, helped by <strong>a $3.9 million in loans to himself<\/strong>. Emmer spent $2.8 million.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s a lot of Renoirs.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=16242\">the chattering classes&#8217; objections<\/a> about &#8220;the toxicity of money in politics&#8221; referred to corporate money. \u00a0Not labor unions, and not trust funds from South Dakota.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, the Campaign Finance reports for the last Gubernatorial election came out. And the media finally noticed &#8211; sort of &#8211; what you learned on this blog last July; Mark Dayton outspent Tom Emmer 2:1, and that most of the money came from &#8220;outside groups&#8221;. MPR had\u00a0the best report, at least compared to the rest [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[320,1],"tags":[115,312],"class_list":["post-17821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mndfl","category-uncategorized","tag-abm","tag-mngov-2010"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17821"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17821\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49472,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17821\/revisions\/49472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}