{"id":1557,"date":"2007-11-05T06:13:06","date_gmt":"2007-11-05T11:13:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1557"},"modified":"2007-11-05T06:13:06","modified_gmt":"2007-11-05T11:13:06","slug":"forgiveness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1557","title":{"rendered":"Forgiveness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You&#8217;ve heard of Scott Beauchamp &#8211; the soldier who, as &#8220;Scott Thomas&#8221;, accused his fellow soldiers of a wholly-fictitious chain of atrocities, with the active connivance of the <em>New Republic.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what I expected of Beauchammp &#8211; who was the subject of a fairly spirited Army investigation after his identity was revealed.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;ll admit that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.michaelyon-online.com\/wp\/beauchamp-and-the-rule-of-second-chances.htm\">this<\/a>\u00a0was just about the <em>last <\/em>thing I expected:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I was at a reconciliation meeting between Sunni and Shia in the West Rashid district of Baghdad on 24 October, and it happened by complete coincidence that I was with Beauchamp\u2019s battalion. In fact, I was with his old company commander for much of the day, although I had no idea for most of it that I was with<em> Beauchamp\u2019s<\/em> old company commander.<\/p>\n<p>At the reconciliation meeting, Beauchamp\u2019s battalion commander, LTC George Glaze, politely introduced himself and asked who I wrote for. When I replied that I just have a little blog, the word caught his ears and he mentioned Beauchamp, who I acknowledged having heard something about. LTC Glaze seemed protective of Beauchamp, despite how the young soldier had maligned his fellow soldiers. In fact, the commander said Beauchamp, having learned his lesson, was given the chance to leave or stay&#8230;Lapses of judgment are bound to happen, and accountability is critical, but that\u2019s not the same thing as pulling out the hanging rope every time a soldier makes a mistake.<\/p>\n<p>Beauchamp is young; under pressure he made a dumb mistake. In fact, he has not always been an ideal soldier. But to his credit, the young soldier decided to stay, and he is serving tonight in a dangerous part of Baghdad. He might well be seriously injured or killed here, and he knows it. He could have quit, but he did not. He faced his peers. I can only imagine the cold shoulders, and worse, he must have gotten. He could have left the unit, but LTC Glaze told me that Beauchamp wanted to stay and make it right. Whatever price he has to pay, he is paying it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So I&#8217;ll give what\u00a0little credit I have to give, where it&#8217;s due.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>LTC Glaze wants to keep Beauchamp, and hopes folks will let it rest. I\u2019m with LTC Glaze on this: it\u2019s time to let Beauchamp get back to the war. The young soldier learned his lessons. He paid enough to earn his second chance that he must know he will never get a third.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think a lot of people might be persuaded to take back some of the things they said about Beauchamp.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As to the <em>New\u00a0Republic,<\/em> though&#8230;\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;some on the staff may feel like they\u2019ve been hounded and treed, but it\u2019s hard to feel the same sympathy for a group of cowards who won\u2019t \u2019fess up and can\u2019t face the scorn of American combat soldiers who were injured by their collective lapse of judgment. It\u2019s up to their readers to decide the ultimate fate.<\/p>\n<p><em>The New Republic<\/em> treed like a bandit . . . personally, I think they would make a nice Daniel Boone hat.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, <em>them,<\/em>\u00a0 I can criticize.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You&#8217;ve heard of Scott Beauchamp &#8211; the soldier who, as &#8220;Scott Thomas&#8221;, accused his fellow soldiers of a wholly-fictitious chain of atrocities, with the active connivance of the New Republic. I&#8217;m not quite sure what I expected of Beauchammp &#8211; who was the subject of a fairly spirited Army investigation after his identity was revealed. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-war-on-terror"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}