Look At Meeeeeeeeeeeee

Joel Doakes from Como Park emails:

Protesters outside the home of Supreme Court Justice Barrett.

First, it’s illegal to protest outside the home of a federal judge and rightly so. There are limits to free speech: fighting words, fire in a theater, perjury on the witness stand, and threatening/intimidating a judge are off limits. If Roe v. Wade is overturned, these gals can take their protests to their state legislatures. They have no place here.

Second, the sign makes clear this protest is not about saving Roe v. Wade’s “first trimester” limitation; it’s not about saving Casey’s “undue burden” limitation; it’s about Kermit Gosnell-style partial birth abortion butchery and Planned Parenthood’s baby-parts-to-order sales. They might be the only seven women in the nation who demand that. The rest of the nation recoils in horror.

Third, their costumes are meant to emphasize their plight. The bloody pants mean that if Roe v. Wade is overturned, women will have to seek back-alley abortions from unqualified practitioners who will leave them hemorrhaging from botched abortions. The tied hands holding the baby mean the women will be prisoners/slaves forced to carry the baby they conceived until it is born and can be given up for adoption. Dire predictions, considering that many states have already moved to guarantee abortions and some employers have even offered to pay for interstate travel if required to obtain one. This is not 1950. Alleys are for drug sales and commercial sex acts, not abortions.

The fact that seven women can get national media coverage for their little stunt instead of a quick trip to the local jail followed by prosecution in federal court indicates the effort likely is coordinated from the very top of the Lesko Brandon administration, probably the same people who sent the FBI after parents who complained to school boards about pedophile grooming curricula and covering up transgender rapes. I hope Democrats run this photo in every campaign ad from now until the election. It’s too much to hope that Republicans would be smart enough to do it.

Joe Doakes

Of course it’s too much to hope the Republicans do it.

But I’m going to help them.

14 thoughts on “Look At Meeeeeeeeeeeee

  1. Pto-abotyion Insurrectionists storm the Wisconsin capitol while the legislature is in session: https://bit.ly/3ncKqlO

    Unlike Minnesota, Wisconsin has a very strong anti-abortion law that, in theory, will go into effect if Roe V Wade is overturned. I say “in theory” because the prosecutors in the counties where there are clinics that perform abortions in Wisconsin are Democrats who won’t enforce the law. The state AG (D) also says that he will not enforce the law.
    But the next state AG may be a pro-life Republican, and he or she could prosecute abortion providers even if the current AG gave them a pass at the time.

  2. Yup! If these morons were protesting in front of Kagan’s, Breyer’s or Sotomayor’s houses, they would have already been put on trial.

  3. It is illegal to protest outside the home of a federal judge? Sheesh.

    As for running this photo in every campaign ad from now until the election, I think you grossly overestimate the effect. Neither the anti-abortion people nor the pro-abortion monsters are going to be swayed, of course. Furthermore, I don’t see any evidence that the great big middle cares all that much either.

  4. Do the girls realize that they are mimicing giving birth?
    Either way, they are practicing for the future.

  5. I’ve become ambivalent about infanticide.

    On one hand, there’s no doubt it dehumanizes civilization.

    On the other hand, those that ❤️ it aren’t much human to begin with, and sparing the world from their spawn is a good thing.

    The one good thing about making it illegal is many leftist slags, like Robin Marty will remove their filthy persons from wholesome, Southern states.

    That whore doing in Alabama in the first place?

    https://mobile.twitter.com/robinmarty

  6. boss, they would be languishing in jail without trial and without charges for years, a la 1/6 political prisoners. And yet these skanks are on the loose because AG’s REFUSE to enforce the law. Why? Because there are 2 Amerikkkas and 14th amendment had been repealed and buried in the libturd one.

  7. On the light side, I think we know why many feminists want napkins and tampons in every bathroom–they obviously aren’t capable of making it to the store on their own. And I’d bet this plays really, really well on the online dating sites.

  8. A poster pic for the best marriageable material of their generation – we are doomed!

  9. So…the far right is doing exactly what the committee is accusing them of; using intimidation and threats of potential violence to stop the truth from coming out, while angrily claiming they didn’t do it on J6?

    If and until arrests are made and connections established between those making the arrests and the “far right”, these are just anonymous threats, assuming they’re real and not a hoax.

    Emery jumping to conclusions and demonstrating textbook confirmation bias? Must be a day ending in “y”.

  10. Yawn. Liberals do something outrageous. People complain. Liberals claim to have received death threats and therefore anybody who complains is a hater who wants Liberals to die. It’s standard procedure, a way to silence legitimate criticism.

    If they’re all killed, I’ll concede I was wrong. Until then . . .

  11. When you get people (on the left and right) whining about receiving “death threats,” well, you know who else gets death threats?
    People on Youtube who claim that cats make better pets than dogs.
    Grow up, fer chrissake.
    It is illegal to threaten a person’s life. You know why so few people who make death threats go to jail? Because the cops won’t investigate the threat if it is not credible.
    I don’t know why journalists don’t follow up on this. Claiming that you are getting death threats is a way celebrities and politicians, and just about anyone else in the news, can manipulate & get sympathy from the media and the public.
    You think Johhny Dep and Amber heard never got a death threat? How about Peter Navarro? How about Rudy Giuliani?
    Interview the investigating detective. If the “death threat” hasn’t been reported to the police, the public should know. If the police aren’t investigating because the threat is not credible, the public should know. If the person making the threat is arrested and charged, the public should know.
    Right now all we’re getting is a race to the bottom in claiming your courageous actions are resulting in death threats.

  12. I believe I said the same thing when Ilhan Omar was claiming she was getting death threats.

    OF COURSE she was. Just like everyone else in Congress, and most likely the Legislature, and everyone else in the public eye, including me, once or twice upon a time.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.