Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others

I’ve been saying (and proving) for years that the mainstream media’s “Fact Check” industry is a bald-faced left-wing propaganda operation.

Circumstantial evidence? Politifact has different answers for the same statement, depending on who says it:

7 thoughts on “Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others”

Thread Jack alert.

I just got this emailed to me…

October 27, 2016

MEDIA ADVISORY

For IMMEDIATE RELEASE

On Friday, October 28, 2016, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) will be announcing the filing of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in Ramsey County District Court against Secretary of State Steve Simon.

Secretary Simon’s policy in the Election Judge Guide illegally directs election judges to allow persons who are marked on the poll roster as “challenged-felony”, “challenged-guardianship” and “challenged-citizenship” to self-certify their own eligibility.

In addition to the legal action, the MVA will also be announcing its petition drive that asks Minnesota election judges to disobey the Secretary of State’s illegal policy on election day.

A press conference has been scheduled for Friday, October 28, 2016, at 10:00 a.m in Room 181, State Office Building, 100 Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, St. Paul, MN 55155.

Former state representative Kirk Stensrud, Eden Prairie, is a co-plaintiff.

Media contacts:

Andrew Cilek – Minnesota Voters Alliance 612.990.2533
Erick Kaardal – Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. 612.341.1074

WTF??

The reprobate Democrat party is pulling out all the stops for Clinton. If these challenges are upheld, does anyone think those votes will get pulled? I’m sure there are stories like this in every Democrat controlled state…and yet these fuckers smirk when anyone suggests there might be fraud at work.

But they will get away with it because y’all are gonna let them get away with it.

DG,

Fasciating (and inevitably wrong) as your comment may have been, DG, I said yesterday and last week: you need to respond to this question, and respond to it in detail, before I’m going to entertain any more of your comments.

Until you respond, and then respond to the responses, your comments will be held in moderation.

It’s your choice; discuss and support one of your many baseless claims to the point where you realize and admit you’re wrong (or, who knows, maybe until you convince us you’re right), or lose your only outlet that has any readers.

Your choice. It makes absolutely no difference to me which you choose.

WSJ’s Best of the Web Editor James Taranto probably has the best description of these “Fact Check” operations run by the Democrat Party Dominated Media Culture. As he noted on Twitter: “‘Fact checking’ is opinion journalism pretending to be some sort of heightened objectivity.” Wasn’t the old media saw – “If your mother tells you she loves you, check it out”?
Interesting all the fact check “claims” from the time of Obamacare/MNSure creation now come a cropper to the hard realities of human nature and actuarial science. Good times.