Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
When the IRS scandal broke and Progressives were poo-pooing it, I said it wasn’t about mistakes or miscommunication but voter suppression. The Obama Administration used the IRS to prevent conservatives from raising money to get their message out, so Romney lost the election.
All that time Dog Gone was howling about voter suppression, she was engaging in one of your most famous laws.
I knew it.
Joe Doakes
Eventually everyone knows it.
“Given those numbers, it is reasonable to be suspicious of the IRS targeting,” said some guy from a right-wing think tank.
Proof!
So it’s not voter suppression when people actually can’t vote. It is voter suppression when far-right groups can’t buy as many votes as they’d like to.
Angryclown finds it instructive to check in and see what you extremist types are “thinking.”
said some guy from a right-wing think tank.
Because those left-wing think tanks are so interested in exposing their own sides misdeeds.
So it’s not voter suppression when people actually can’t vote.
Because Obama didn’t have enough voters?
Ya’ walk in, ya’ show yer photo ID, and ya’ vote.
Some people must depend on really stupid voters.
You got it all wrong, Mongo. Ya’ get the Koch brothers to pour money into a nonprofit, ya’ fool the IRS into letting it avoid taxes, ya’ buy TV commercials lying about the opponent’s record while pretending to be independent, ya’ do whatever ya’ can to suppress the vote, cuz most normal people think yer full of shit.
voter suppression is now defined by someone being too lazy to get a photo ID in any 2 year span ?? Or by TV commercials ?? Ugh …..
Ya’ get the Koch brothers to pour money into a nonprofit, ya’ fool the IRS into letting it avoid taxes, ya’ buy TV commercials lying about the opponent’s record while pretending to be independent, ya’ do whatever ya’ can to suppress the vote…
…and Alida Messinger will have herself an awesome intelletual property suit.
I am fully in favor of requiring all non-profits to pay taxes on their profits.
He called me Mongo. My name is Mingo. I’m going to go have a good sulk.
Bozo- “you do whatever you can to suppress the vote…” Thanks for your detailed, reasoned and well thought out over-generalization with no specifics .
Candy-Gram for Mongo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8ciVBQixpU
I suppose you should give them credit for candor. They make no real effort to disguise the fact that they are far more concerned with keeping the Democrat’s voters from the polls than with any notional voter fraud that might somehow happen. Eventually, and sooner rather than later, demography will make this sort of strategy unworkable for electoral reasons.
They make no real effort to disguise the fact that they are far more concerned with stuffing ballot boxes with illegal democrat votes than they are with any notional vote suppression that might somehow happen.
It’s the groundless assertion game! I can play it too!
I win!
No, you simply ‘asserted’.
” …… voter fraud that might somehow happen.” ?? Someone’s not paying attention
The first thing that you need to acknowledge when discussing ‘voter fraud’ is that the libs and dems use a very special definition of ‘voter fraud’ chosen by the far-left Brennan Center for Justice. This definition requires that a person intentionally defraud the electoral system by casting a vote when they know that they are not legally allowed to do so.
This incredibly hard to prove, and the Brennan Center — which believes that illegal aliens should be allowed to vote — should not be allowed anywhere near a place where you want good government.
If a person drives around town, picks up random individuals, brings them to a polling place, and pays them five dollars to go in and cast ballots, unless the individuals can be shown to have knowingly cast illegal votes, the democrats will not consider a fraudulent vote to have been cast.
The person rounding up the vagrants and paying them to vote has not cast a vote himself, so he his not considered to have committed voter fraud under the democrat/Brennan Center definition, either.
This means that you could conceivably have a precinct where more people voted than are residents of the precinct, and still have ‘no voter fraud’.
He called me Mongo. My name is Mingo. I’m going to go have a good sulk.
Obviously, he merely considers you a pawn in the game of life.
This means that you could conceivably have a precinct where more people voted than are residents of the precinct, and still have ‘no voter fraud’.
If there is one indisputable thing, it is the fact that the left has a monopoly on redefining language for political expediency.