Right Roosh (edited by JRoosh), McCain isn’t negative.
“OBama is the annointed one”
“OBama is too inexperienced – he just has done ‘community organizing’ – and his followers are a bunch of Obamaniacs”
“OBama is a celebrity candidate”
“Obama isn’t patriotic enough” (to McCain’s credit, at least he disavowed this one)
The Repugs are pretty good at getting other mouthpieces to say what they want to say so that the candidate doesn’t look dirty, but John IS dirty – HE referred to Obama as a ‘celebrity candidate’ – which hilariously backfired on him when Paris Hilton openly mocked him.
Good thing it isn’t about cult personalities or anything, I mean, you focues SOOOO much on issues.
JRoosh posted this one, dude. Proofreading is your friend, too.
HE referred to Obama as a ‘celebrity candidate’ – which hilariously backfired on him when Paris Hilton openly mocked him.
Being mocked by Paris Hilton is hardly a “backfire”.
And if something is negative and accurate, is it not worth saying? He IS too experienced, he IS as much a celeb as a politician (you shoulda seen the crowds when he appeared in Saint Paul), and Michele Obama is the one who said he was going to save this nation’s soul, not us.
As to focusing on issues – well, this blog does it. You seem to have trouble with it.
Being mocked by Paris Hilton is hardly a “backfire”.
Paris Hilton having a more intelligent energy policy than Obama, on the other hand…
Peev IS the top cartoon. WORD FOR FRICKING WORD.
Paris’s ad was funny. It gets McCain’s ad out there even more. Where is the backfire?
NYT’s has a columnist call it racist and gets the landmarks wrong. Again people laugh at the NYT and the idiot columnist. Also putting the ad front and center again. Where is the backfire?
Most people aren’t looking to Paris for intelligent political discussion. It is funny though as Kermit noted that PH’s energy policy makes more sense than Obambi’s.
Right Roosh (edited by JRoosh), McCain isn’t negative.
“OBama is the annointed one”
“OBama is too inexperienced – he just has done ‘community organizing’ – and his followers are a bunch of Obamaniacs”
“OBama is a celebrity candidate”
“Obama isn’t patriotic enough” (to McCain’s credit, at least he disavowed this one)
The Repugs are pretty good at getting other mouthpieces to say what they want to say so that the candidate doesn’t look dirty, but John IS dirty – HE referred to Obama as a ‘celebrity candidate’ – which hilariously backfired on him when Paris Hilton openly mocked him.
Good thing it isn’t about cult personalities or anything, I mean, you focues SOOOO much on issues.
JRoosh posted this one, dude. Proofreading is your friend, too.
HE referred to Obama as a ‘celebrity candidate’ – which hilariously backfired on him when Paris Hilton openly mocked him.
Being mocked by Paris Hilton is hardly a “backfire”.
And if something is negative and accurate, is it not worth saying? He IS too experienced, he IS as much a celeb as a politician (you shoulda seen the crowds when he appeared in Saint Paul), and Michele Obama is the one who said he was going to save this nation’s soul, not us.
As to focusing on issues – well, this blog does it. You seem to have trouble with it.
Being mocked by Paris Hilton is hardly a “backfire”.
Paris Hilton having a more intelligent energy policy than Obama, on the other hand…
Peev IS the top cartoon. WORD FOR FRICKING WORD.
Paris’s ad was funny. It gets McCain’s ad out there even more. Where is the backfire?
NYT’s has a columnist call it racist and gets the landmarks wrong. Again people laugh at the NYT and the idiot columnist. Also putting the ad front and center again. Where is the backfire?
Most people aren’t looking to Paris for intelligent political discussion. It is funny though as Kermit noted that PH’s energy policy makes more sense than Obambi’s.