Today, Crow Wing County (CWC) Attorney Don Ryan is convening a Grand Jury. As noted last week, county attorneys don’t customarily reveal the subject of a grand jury’s deliberation – but we do know that Monty Jensen and Al Stene, two principals in the case this blog wrote about last year in which it appeared that staffers from a home for vulnerable adults were filling out ballots for their charges.
The Grand Jury is going to be in session, officially, through Thursday. We likely won’t hear much about the proceedings until they’re over.
I’ve run down the story’s chronology a few times, most recently last week.
I published this bit, last week – but it was buried in the middle of larger PDF file. I thought I’d break this one out a bit.
It’s the list of people who took out absentee ballots last October 29 – the Friday before election day.
You can see Monty Jensen, who pops up at 4:31 on the list.
And you can see Jim Stene, at 4:18 – who was legally entitled to vote but, according to his father Al, had no interest in voting and no knowledge of how government works (even answering “Gerald Ford” when asked who the president was).
And you can see Daniel Carel (4:24) and Crieg Ruesken (4:21) who, as we showed last week, are under guardianship and unambiguously not allowed to vote under Minnesota law.
The list shows that Stene, Carel and Ruesken all voted at the time that Jensen said he saw the group from the Clark Lake group home voting, and at which he alleged that he saw their ballots being filled out by staff. This contradicts statements in the mainstream and alt-media that nobody from Clark Lake was in the building at the time Jensen claimed.
I’ll be bringing you the news from the Grand Jury as soon as I find out more.
Do you know what a Grand Jury’s job is? Hmm? Hmm?
It’s FACTCHECKING!
We should be seeing the standard denial that any fraud exists in MN from our resident Faux Fact Checker any moment now!
Yeah – although to use “Penigma’s” logic, “her silence speaks volumes”.
It’s really just a semantic issue. She thinks she’s a “fact checker”; she’s really more of a “QC inspector” who compares statements with current lefty conventional wisdom.
I assume Mrs. Teasdale’s silence is because she’s too busy celebrating Joanne Kloppenburg’s victory.
Speaking of Peni’sBlog:
“This is significant for a blog that covers politics, as there are a number of political figures on the right who believe sincerely in the ‘end days’ happening sometimen very soon. “
I fact checked this and there are always a number, that number could be 1 or 1000 or 0… Or maybe her pants ARE actually on fire?
The problem with appeals to authority involving “fact check” websites is that if you use them for one thing you have to accept the results of their “fact check” in all things — that’s why it’s called “appeal to authority“.