I exchanged emails this morning with a good friend from across the aisle on Senator John McCain’s selection of Governor Sarah Palin and whether it was a tactical response to Obama’s dismissing of Hillary Clinton.
It sure seems like a reach for disgruntled Hilary voters rather than a sophisticated presidential selection.
My response:
I like her so far but I think it could also be risky in that she is an unknown. He will either go down as a genius or an also-ran if America isn’t ready. No one knows how she will perform in a national debate, which is much more important than convention speeches on either party’s part. On the plus side, she has more executive experience (limited as that may be) than Obama does, and even arguably McCain and Biden, neither of which have been in such a position.
The intriguing issue here is among all four candidates, she is the most able to define herself as she isn’t tied to a voting record or a history of national media appearances.
Having said all that, I would have preferred Pawlenty. Obama clearly – clearly should have chosen Clinton, and at the very least should have vetted her. I think he lost the election the moment he didn’t.
As much as I have also grown in my disdain for the political manipulation that has marked our process for years now, I am a pragmatist in that I want my candidate to do whatever is ethical to win. Picking a female Vice President to pick up the disaffected Hillary voters is clearly such a move. If you are reading my posts, you will recall that I asked my readers, if for only a moment, to consider McCain/Clinton.
What say you?