{"id":89744,"date":"2025-06-26T05:56:50","date_gmt":"2025-06-26T10:56:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=89744"},"modified":"2025-06-26T05:56:51","modified_gmt":"2025-06-26T10:56:51","slug":"whither-klink","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=89744","title":{"rendered":"Whither Klink?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Piglet can&#8217;t be happy about <a href=\"_wp_link_placeholder\" data-wplink-edit=\"true\">this latest Star-Tribune poll<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Gov. Tim Walz&#8217;s approval rating has dipped below 50% since his failed run for vice president last year, and about half of Minnesotans say he shouldn&#8217;t run for a third consecutive term in 2026, according to a new poll. The results suggest the DFL governor could face headwinds if he runs for re-election again, particularly from voters in greater Minnesota and the suburbs outside Hennepin and Ramsey counties. He also faces opposition from a majority of independents who disapprove of his performance.<\/p>\n<p>The new Star Tribune\/Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication Minnesota Poll found 49% approve of Walz&#8217;s performance and 50% disapprove. A previous Minnesota Poll conducted last September found 53% of Minnesotans approved of Walz\u2019s performance while 44% disapproved.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s only the second time Walz\u2019s approval rating has fallen below 50% in the Minnesota Poll.\\<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s hard to read much history into this &#8220;Minnesota&#8221; Poll; the poll has changed hands so many times since its heyday from 1989-2012.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But this is not great news for Walz.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t expect him to go out without a fight, of course; he &#8211; or Gwen &#8211; palpably craves national office.\u00a0 The question is, given:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the extraordinary nature of a third term as governor<\/li>\n<li>Walz&#8217;s unpopularity (which I&#8217;m going to guess is worse than even this latest re-dressing of the MN Poll shows, becasue that&#8217;s never a bad bet)<\/li>\n<li>The emergence of other contenders in the DFL &#8211; radicals like Peggy Flanagan (who&#8217;s terribly overmatched in her Senate race against Angie Craig), and relative moderates like Dean Philips&#8230;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&#8230;will the Tim Walz brand support another run?<\/p>\n<p>I suspect we&#8217;re going to see a\u00a0<em>huge\u00a0<\/em>reconstruction effort.\u00a0 Which I frankly hope succeeds, at least through DFL convention season.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Postscript:\u00a0 wouldn&#8217;t now be a great time for the MNGOP to suspend its circular firing squad and actually focus on fundraising and fighting a campaign?<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Piglet can&#8217;t be happy about this latest Star-Tribune poll: Gov. Tim Walz&#8217;s approval rating has dipped below 50% since his failed run for vice president last year, and about half of Minnesotans say he shouldn&#8217;t run for a third consecutive term in 2026, according to a new poll. The results suggest the DFL governor [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,320],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-governor","category-mndfl"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=89744"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89744\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89745,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89744\/revisions\/89745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=89744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=89744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=89744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}