{"id":7999,"date":"2010-01-19T12:28:26","date_gmt":"2010-01-19T17:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=7999"},"modified":"2010-01-19T12:28:26","modified_gmt":"2010-01-19T17:28:26","slug":"conventional-wisdom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=7999","title":{"rendered":"Conventional Wisdom"},"content":{"rendered":"

With the departure of Norm Coleman from the gubernatorial race, things are both wide-open and, paradoxically, more focused.\u00a0 The GOP is down to three real contenders – Tom Emmer, Marty Seifert and Dave Hann.\u00a0 The DFL is holding steady, so far, at about 12 candidates.\u00a0 The Indpendence Party shows us the value of those little loopholes in “Major Party” laws.<\/p>\n

Dave Mindeman at MnpACT\u00a0 thinks he smells victory<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Now that Norm Coleman has made his decision and practically every person in the world has given us their opinion, let’s go for one more.<\/p>\n

Here’s my opinion.<\/p>\n

Minnesota will have a Democratic Governor elected in 2010.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And I, as we shall see, disagree.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Onward.<\/p>\n

Now, I realize that nowhere in that sentence do you see Norm Coleman’s name, but Norm’s decision is a pretty direct translation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to the “conventional wisdom” in this state, that’s exactly true.\u00a0 The CW has it that Minnesota is a purplish-blue state that needs a “moderate” for any statewide office.\u00a0 Of course, the term “Moderate” – and for that matter, “conservative” – rarely are put into any meaningful context (and the keepers of conventional wisdom in this state, the DFL and media – pardon the redundancy – distinguish the concept of “liberal” no more than an Eskimo distinguishes the idea of “cold”).\u00a0 And in many elections, that might be OK.<\/p>\n

But not this one.\u00a0<\/p>\n

We’ll return to that.<\/p>\n

Without Norm Coleman in the race….<\/p>\n

a) The GOP nominee will be either Marty Seifert or Tom Emmer. A contest between the two of them will be causing them to fall all over each other grabbing for the farthest right slot. Besides I can’t think of Seifert without remembering his dalliance with pirates. Arrrgh!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Remember that “no meaninful context” bit I mentioned above?\u00a0 Here’s where it kinda matters.<\/p>\n

Mindeman does what most media\/DFL types in Minnesota do; assumes everyone to the right of Arne Carlson is an Attilla the Hun in a gray suit. We conservatives all look the same to Dave Mindeman (and pretty much everyone like him).<\/p>\n

But they’re as different as can be; Seifert is a personable pragmatist in the Tim Pawlenty mold – which to a DFLer means “heartless conservative marauder”, and to a conservative means “acceptable, but needs constant scrutiny to keep them from swerving to the center”.\u00a0\u00a0 Emmer is the real deal, of course; after years of hearing the left crying wolf over the supposed conservatism of the MN GOP, Emmer is an actual hip-shooting podium-dominating Reagan Conservative.<\/p>\n

And to someone like Mindeman, that’s all that one needs to know.\u00a0<\/p>\n

We’ll come back to that.<\/p>\n

b) So far, the Independence Party has not come up with a strong enough name to be a deciding factor. Most of the candidates in the past have had somewhat liberal leanings and siphoned off Democratic votes. Right now, the top prospect is Tom Horner, who will be a bigger drawing card for siphoning off moderate Republicans from the GOP.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In an ordinary year?\u00a0 Perhaps.\u00a0 But there are two wild cards in play here (as well as the fact that the Independence Party has become less of a “wild card” than a “soft three”).\u00a0 Those cards are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. This is not a normal year for conservatives.<\/li>\n
  2. Tom Emmer, in person, resists Mindeman’s facile stereotype.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    We’ll come back to both of those.<\/p>\n

    c) Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I don’t see the Democratic candidate moving (or perceived) as far to the left as is being surmised. With the probability of a primary challenge a virtual certainty, the Dems will have to make a broader appeal much earlier than the GOP candidate. This will give the Democratic candidate (and right now it doesn’t matter who it is), the advantage of broader statewide appeal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    That is a good point, as far as it goes.\u00a0 The would-be Dem candidate is going to have to play less to the base than in a normal race, and more to real Minnesotans.\u00a0<\/p>\n

    And they’re going to have <\/em>to, because the DFL Legislature has handed the MNGOP nominee, whomever <\/em>he is, a priceless gift; their arrogant, self-entitled, spendthrift profligacy in the past two sessions stand a great chance of turning the southwest, northwest, and the third-tier suburbs – the GOP’s stronghold, which got a lot less strong in the past two elections – vibrantly red.\u00a0 These areas are the hotbeds of the Tea Party movement; the conventional wisdom in the past few elections had it that the third tier ‘burbs were the swing districts, and if they were then, they are moreso now.<\/p>\n

    d) It is also doubtful that the Republicans will be able to substantially outraise the Democrats in money. Norm Coleman could have presented a challenge in that regard — the rest of the field will have a tougher time. Big donors will be more concerned with Congressional or Senate races. The GOP field wasn’t attracting the big money before Norm’s announcement — and even if they were holding back to see what he would do, that doesn’t necessarily mean there will be an enthusiastic outpouring now….it’s still the same field they were hesitant about.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    It’s a possible problem – but it’s focused on “big money”, which is a very DFL-y perspective.\u00a0 The MNGOP has always been about small donors.\u00a0 Great case in point – in 2002, Paul Wellstone and Norm Coleman raised similar totals.\u00a0 But Norm got his money from five times as many people; the donations were smaller, but they made up for it with volume.\u00a0 And the GOP is turning the corner on winning back the Internet fundraising race; I suspect “big donors” will be a lot less important to the GOP nominee.<\/p>\n

    e) There will be no GOP primary battle. Republicans think this is a good thing, but even if Norm would have lost in a primary, the attention would have given Seifert or Emmer some serious name recognition. And they need it. The Democrats may have to fight it out, but the media attention will be focused on them and if the winner has the money to stay with it into the general election…. well, same result….. Democrat wins.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Enh.\u00a0 Depends on the Democrat that gets through, and what the GOP nominee does.\u00a0 Mindeman would be absolutely correct – if the GOP nominee were totally dependent on the metro media for exposure while the DFL was sorting things out.<\/p>\n

    That’s no longer entirely true.<\/p>\n

    And people out there are pissed<\/em>.\u00a0 That’s not normal.<\/p>\n

    It’s too late for someone else to get in. It’s Seifert or Emmer.<\/p>\n

    Democrat wins<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    That’d be the conventional wisdom.<\/p>\n

    It’s been a bad year for conventional wisdom, so far.<\/p>\n

    More on this tomorrow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    With the departure of Norm Coleman from the gubernatorial race, things are both wide-open and, paradoxically, more focused.\u00a0 The GOP is down to three real contenders – Tom Emmer, Marty Seifert and Dave Hann.\u00a0 The DFL is holding steady, so far, at about 12 candidates.\u00a0 The Indpendence Party shows us the value of those little […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-campaign-10","category-minnesota-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7999"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7999\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8001,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7999\/revisions\/8001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}