Let me try to fomulate the logic, here. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
:If it biological man says she identifies as a woman, that decision must be treated as sacred.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ditto a biological woman claiming to now be, or identify, as a male.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Naturally, someone of any gender declaring an affectional orientation for their own gender is to be supported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Industries and entire areas of academic disciplines have sprung up to support all of those decisions. Institutions, up through and including academia, the American Civil Liberties Union, and a fair chunk of corporate America, deem that decision to be absolute, inviolate and ironclad. Naturally, there’s a branch of medical science devoted to helping people transition physically as well as psychologically, to support that identity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
But a gay person deciding they want to identify as straight, and making efforts to do so, must be squashed with the full power of the state<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why the special treatment? <\/p>\n\n\n\n What side effects affect \u201cgay conversion therapy\u201d, that don\u2019t affect any other change in identity?<\/p>\n\n\n\n