{"id":76733,"date":"2021-02-03T08:25:43","date_gmt":"2021-02-03T14:25:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=76733"},"modified":"2021-02-03T08:30:44","modified_gmt":"2021-02-03T14:30:44","slug":"not-an-animal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=76733","title":{"rendered":"Not An Animal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\u201cProtect\u201d Minnesota has a new executive director.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We’ll come back to that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Modern American “progressivism”, like all its many forebears in the past 200 years, has been all about rallying people against boogeymen. From “monarchists” in the French Revolution, to “Wreckers” in Stalin’s USSR to the Wobbly’s “Bosses”, up through “the patriarchy” and “the man” and “counterrevolutionaries” in Red China and San Francisco in the sixties and seventies, and if you have a hard time distinguishing between ’em, join the club. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today, the boogeymen…er, boogiepeople on the left are pretty much all the things that people who are included are told to be “anti”. “Anti-Racism” “Anti-Misogyny” (not just sexism, anymore – it’s the more active, more malevolent noun these days), “Anti-Fascism”, “Anti-Transphobia”, and on and on – all of which sounds like good things to be “anti”…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…and, unsurprisingly, when you dig into the “Root Causes” of all those nouns, all things trace back to “Western Civilization” in all its particulars: the Judeo-Christian value on the individual and their worth, value, rights and responsibilities and potential of each and every person, as a person<\/em> with a mind, a point of view, and at the end of the day an indivisible soul <\/em>of personal, societal, political, intellectual and metaphysical worth. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those aspects of humanity are anathema to progressivism in all its flavors. The focus is on the group – the Marxists “classes”, the Nazi’s irreducible focus on race, the modern academic Left’s obsession with a byzantine network of intersectional identity groups. The individual is nothing but a vote (for now), an appetite, a widget to be moved through the production line of life (like Obamacare’s awful caricature of Progressive humanity, “Julia”). Progressivism is “Materialist”. Souls, individual intellects and thoughts and reams, all are ephemeral; humans are widgets that consume and produce, and whose worth and value (to those in power) is expressed via their membership in the collective. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those widgets have a term. “Bodies”. Not people. Not brains. Not souls. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bodies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyway – “P”M has a new director. And unlike the dotty, dizzy neverending font of comedy that was Heather Martens<\/a>, or the serial fabulist The “Reverend” Nancy Nord Bence<\/a>, the new director presents us with a few surprises. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

She’s “a gun owner herself” – which might be seen in several ways. Is “P”M moderating? Are they realizing that the culture war has slipped far enough away from them, especially over this past year, that they have to start speaking to people who need to be convinced? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And she’s apparently incredibly famous, since she apparently just goes by “Rashmi”. I’ve turned “Protect” Minnesota’s website, Facebook feed and other social media upside down, and not been able to find any reference to a last name, which is Seneviratne, by the way. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But even during the reign of the serial fabulist the Reverend Nord Bence, “Protect” MN wasn’t nearly extreme enough in its hatred of guns and (law-abiding) gun owners, enough for some <\/em>people. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

“P”M spawned a breakway group, “Survivors Lead” – basically a woman, Rachel Joseph<\/a>, with a long history of progressive activism and a story; an aunt who was murdered, according to Ms. Joseph’s story, by a gun<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quick aside: I don’t minimize anyone’s trauma over having a loved one murdered. But in the many times I’ve heard Ms. Joseph’s story, she’s never once mentioned a perpetrator, someone actually holding <\/em>and using <\/em>the gun that killed her aunt; that persons evil motivation, the legal fallout from the murder, whether that person was sentenced or not. It’d be wrong to crack wise – “what, did the gun animate itself?” – but omitting a perpetrator, his\/her motives and the like from the conversation is incredibly intellectually dishonest. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyway – “Rashmi” and her apparent moderation are not going over well with “Survivors Lead”:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The extreme heckling the not-as-extreme about getting less extreme. That qualifies as “dog bites man”, at the very most. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather less so? There followed some more, er, ethnically pointed traffic on one social media feed (from which I’ve long been blocked) or another. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

After which “P”M – operating through its usual social media persona, the omniscient third person that used to be Martens and Nord Bence – responded:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On the one hand, watching the agents of Big Left eating each other is one of my favorite spectator sports. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And if the biggest semi-organic anti-gun group in MInnesota (shaddap about Moms Want Action already) is pivoting from pushing Linda Slocum’s gun grab bill to highlighting the inequity of gun control (“Race, class and geography all play into who gets to have a gun and who doesn’t” – which is something every Second Amendment activist has known for 50 years) and speaking in the first “person” to the prudence of victims of violence to arm up, then in culture war terms that’s the sound of the first tank crossing the pontoon bridge at Remagen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But…”white bodied privilege?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the flaming hootie hoo?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I thought for a moment – is this a shot back at the Rachel Dolezals and Elizabeth Warrens of the world, with their flip-flopping identities, by “actual” “people of color”, reinforcing the idea that while you might “identify” with one degree melanin or another, your apparent appearance still wins out in the great privilege lottery (which will, I suspect, get pilloried hard by the Trans crowd, for whom perceived identity is everything? I’ll let the fight that one out). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But no. It’s much less hilarious than that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It’s “inclusion language” – slang or argot that one class of people use to track who is in, and who is “out” – to be sure. That’s part of it, and people are noticing<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Referring to people as bodies is a reminder, writer Elizabeth Barnes says in an interview, that \u201cracism isn\u2019t just about the ideas that you have in your head.\u201d Barnes is the author of \u201cThe Minority Body: A Theory of Disability, The Girl Behind the Wall.\u201d In intellectual discussions, theories about social oppression sound almost disembodied; \u201cwe talk about prejudice,\u201d Barnes says, \u201clike it\u2019s just a matter of ideas.\u201d The point is to emphasize the physical violence done to black people through slavery, lynching, and police brutality. In the case of women, the term \u201cbodies\u201d highlights \u201cwhat happens to women\u2019s bodies in health care contexts, in sexual contexts, in reproductive contexts.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

But behond that? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It’s a nod to the materialism of the left – that the mind, the thoughts, the indivisible soul <\/em>of the indivisual human being is not merely irrelevant, but inconvenient to the obsession with identity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Your melanin defines you. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In some ways its a cheap ad hominem – “of course<\/em> you’d think that, you are (add a reference to your target’s melanin, or lack thereof)”. But pointing logical fallacies out to the foot soldiers of Big Left is a little like arguing salinity with sharks; it’s just part of the water they swim in. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So – gun groups eating each other? Good. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The debate contributing to the ongoing hijacking of the language? Bad. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The whole thing participating, in its own little way, in the further erosion of one of the ideals that’s made Western Civilization the most successful, and humane <\/em>, civilization in human history? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Worse. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cProtect\u201d Minnesota has a new executive director. We’ll come back to that. Modern American “progressivism”, like all its many forebears in the past 200 years, has been all about rallying people against boogeymen. From “monarchists” in the French Revolution, to “Wreckers” in Stalin’s USSR to the Wobbly’s “Bosses”, up through “the patriarchy” and “the man” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[420,24,54,414,309,37,340,426,18,337,374,383,229,349,22],"tags":[274],"class_list":["post-76733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancelled","category-culture-war","category-ebony-and-ivory","category-identity-first","category-indoctrinate-u","category-language","category-lie-first","category-orwell-overestimated-democrats","category-pc","category-privilege","category-social-justice","category-the-collapsing-church","category-third-rails","category-urban-liberal-privilege-liberal-tyranny","category-victim-disarmament","tag-protectmn"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=76733"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76733\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76742,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76733\/revisions\/76742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=76733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=76733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=76733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}