{"id":69569,"date":"2018-12-26T06:00:42","date_gmt":"2018-12-26T12:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=69569"},"modified":"2018-12-22T22:20:31","modified_gmt":"2018-12-23T04:20:31","slug":"faith-no-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=69569","title":{"rendered":"Faith No More"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Vermont teen busted planning to carry out a school lmassacre. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That’s the good news. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bad news? Then, they went and confiscated the firearms belonging to a relative that had nothing to do with the case<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the news report and the law as written, the actions taken by law enforcement were illegal and should have been prevented by the presiding judge.
This case raises serious questions about judicial review in gun violence restraining order cases. Many who push for \u201cred flag\u201d laws claim that the courts will weigh the evidence at hand and the law equally without violating individual rights.\u00a0The Vermont law clearly states that it is only applicable when \u201cprohibiting a person from purchasing, possessing, or receiving a dangerous weapon or having a dangerous weapon within the person\u2019s custody or control.\u201d
But in this case, the firearms in question were owned by a relative and kept in another home. Having\u00a0potential<\/em>\u00a0access to them by criminal means like theft doesn\u2019t qualify under the law.

<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Further proof that there is\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0thing\u00a0<\/em>as\u00a0a “good faith compromise” with gun control advcoates. Every single one is either:<\/p>\n\n\n\n