{"id":63130,"date":"2017-05-15T07:00:09","date_gmt":"2017-05-15T12:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=63130"},"modified":"2017-05-15T08:22:19","modified_gmt":"2017-05-15T13:22:19","slug":"calling-all-davids","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=63130","title":{"rendered":"Calling All Davids"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/DFLMinistryofTruthLARGE.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-25707 alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/DFLMinistryofTruthLARGE-300x227.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"227\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/DFLMinistryofTruthLARGE-300x227.png 300w, http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/DFLMinistryofTruthLARGE.png 320w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>Last week, we noted that the <em>Strib\u00a0<\/em>had rejected an op-ed by Sarah Cade &#8211; a center-left African-American woman who happens to be a competition shooter, a friend of mine, and the owner of one of the most rightous ARs I&#8217;ve seen.<\/p>\n<p>By way of trying to outflank the<em>\u00a0<\/em><em>Strib&#8217;s\u00a0<\/em>abusive monopoly on political opinion publishing, I\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=63041\">posted her entire op-ed on this blog last week<\/a>\u00a0in its entirety.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday came news that, with the advance of a &#8220;Stand your Ground&#8221; bill to hearings in the House Rules Committee this week, the\u00a0<em>Strib\u00a0<\/em>ran a series of fact-free opinion pieces against the legislation &#8211; but not a single piece in support. \u00a0 \u00a0Against the fact-free &#8211; and largely Bloomberg-financed &#8211; dreck, not a single word of learned response was allowed to see the light of day in this state&#8217;s misbegotten &#8220;newspaper of record&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8221;m just a little blog. \u00a0I&#8217;m David&#8217;s left toenail, going up against Goliath.<\/p>\n<p>Well, you and me &#8211;\u00a0<em>we\u00a0<\/em>are David&#8217;s left toenail.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to urge you do a couple of things:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Pass Sarah&#8217;s article around; I&#8217;m going to reprint it\u00a0<em>again\u00a0<\/em>below the jump.<\/li>\n<li>If you&#8217;re on social media, post this on Twitter. \u00a0(I&#8217;ll also be posting on Twitter, as dirty as that makes me feel).<\/li>\n<li>If you&#8217;re a Facebook user, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/gunownersmn\/photos\/a.223706547798844.1073741828.219302818239217\/757623857740441\/?type=3&amp;theater\">share Sarah&#8217;s Facebook post<\/a>, with the facts of the situation and the text of her op-ed. \u00a0 .<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It&#8217;s not much. \u00a0But it&#8217;s the best that we can do.<\/p>\n<p>And every once in a while, David gets in a lucky shot.<\/p>\n<p>More on the &#8220;Stand your Ground&#8221; hearings later this week.<\/p>\n<p>P.S. to the\u00a0<em>Strib<\/em>: \u00a0it&#8217;s been a while since I publicly said I sincerely hope the free market drives that little DFL PR shop you call a &#8220;newspaper&#8221; out of business for good.<\/p>\n<p>The more things chance, the less they change.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>COMMUNITIES OF COLOR NEED STAND YOUR GROUND<br \/>\n&#8211; Editorial by Sarah Cade<\/p>\n<p>Minnesota desperately needs common sense gun laws \u2013 just not the ones you might think. Bills HF238 and HF188 sought to remedy unreasonable components of the current system, but were not included in the public safety omnibus. These bills should be included as amendments.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_63042\" style=\"width: 307px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/10376169_894623272571_3339211532853128996_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-63042\" class=\"wp-image-63042 \" src=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/10376169_894623272571_3339211532853128996_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"297\" height=\"438\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-63042\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sarah Cade. Remember, &#8220;Shooters are just a bunch of angry, fat white guys&#8221; (quote from an unattributed leftyblogger).<br \/> (Photo Oleg Volk, courtesy Sarah Cade).<\/p><\/div>\n<p>HF238 included a provision commonly known as \u201cstand your ground.\u201d Stand your ground laws serve an important purpose for communities of color: they defend the innocent from overzealous prosecution. Ideally, a self defense claim should center on whether your use of force was reasonable under the circumstances, not on whether you could run faster than your attacker or whether you memorized the blueprints of the building before making the split second decision to defend your life.<\/p>\n<p>Stand your ground removes the requirement to prove you could not retreat in court. Rather than forcing you to prove a negative, it places the burden of proof where it belongs: on the state. The concept that a person is innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of American justice \u2013 or at least it\u2019s supposed to be.<\/p>\n<p>In reality, exercising your right to self defense leads to further victimization by the legal system. As a person of color, I know that racial stereotypes make a judge and jury less likely to give me the benefit of the doubt than my white peers. I also know that the legal system will attempt to intimidate me into taking a plea bargain for a crime I didn\u2019t commit. These problems are compounded if I\u2019m poor, don\u2019t know my rights, or can\u2019t obtain competent defense. Stand your ground laws help protect me from a system that chews up and spits out people who look like me.<\/p>\n<p>Contrary to the misinformation put out by Minnesota\u2019s leading gun control group, stand your ground does NOT allow you to shoot people for wearing a hoodie, it does not allow people to \u201cshoot first,\u201d and it does not allow people to shoot anytime they feel subjectively threatened. In fact, it\u2019s hard to repeat those statements with a straight face if one has even a passing familiarity with Minnesota\u2019s byzantine web of self defense laws (although they helpfully make the point that our laws need simplification and reform so laypeople can understand them).<\/p>\n<p>Stand your ground would not change the requirement to act reasonably. Just like under current precedent, in order to present a valid claim of self defense, a person must have BOTH an \u201cactual and honest belief that he or she was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm,\u201d AND \u201cthe existence of reasonable grounds for that belief.\u201d (State of Minnesota v. Baker 1968)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe lack of a duty to retreat does not abrogate the obligation to act reasonably when using force in self defense. Therefore, in all situations in which a party claims self-defense, even absent a duty to retreat, the key inquiry will still be into the reasonableness of the use of force and the level of force under the specific circumstances of each case.\u201d (State of Minnesota v. Glowacki 2001)<\/p>\n<p>Despite overblown claims of racism, stand your ground is not in itself a racist law \u2014 mostly because there\u2019s nothing to enforce. Instead, it is a DEFENSE that is invoked to protect the rights of an individual in court. It helps people of color defend themselves successfully from a predatory legal system that is stacked against them at every level, from arrest to sentencing.<\/p>\n<p>According to data collected by the Tampa Bay Times, stand your ground provisions are more likely to be used to successfully defend black people than white people. Black people are 16.8% of Florida\u2019s population, but make up 33% of SYG acquittals, while white people are 77.7% of the population, but account for only 56% of acquittals (note that the homicide rates for blacks did not increase, so this discrepancy is NOT due to the myth of suspicious whites shooting first. Instead, it means more blacks are avoiding unjust prosecution).<\/p>\n<p>As a person of color who is also a gun owner, I know that HF238 and HF188 would help me, and people who look like me, to protect ourselves. I know similar provisions are common in other states (the majority of states have some version of stand your ground; over ten have permitless carry), and that the hysteria about these laws is fueled by fear rather than rational analysis.<\/p>\n<p>I also know that our justice system is plagued with racial inequality at every level. Stand your ground doesn\u2019t change that, as it\u2019s outside the scope of one bill to solve such pervasive problems. However, it does help defendants of color avoid unjust persecution, and that\u2019s a step in the right direction.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Sarah Cade is a competitive pistol shooter and a volunteer Team Leader for the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, we noted that the Strib\u00a0had rejected an op-ed by Sarah Cade &#8211; a center-left African-American woman who happens to be a competition shooter, a friend of mine, and the owner of one of the most rightous ARs I&#8217;ve seen. By way of trying to outflank the\u00a0Strib&#8217;s\u00a0abusive monopoly on political opinion publishing, I\u00a0posted her [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[130,2,189],"tags":[195],"class_list":["post-63130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tc-media-bias","category-minnesota-politics","category-minnesotas-ministry-of-truth","tag-stand-your-ground"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=63130"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63139,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63130\/revisions\/63139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=63130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=63130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=63130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}