![\"Image](\"https:\/\/scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net\/v\/t1.0-0\/p526x296\/18199411_1836137236705082_1912881131551270545_n.jpg?oh=6106ff9dd62e26e0f91cb44dc008bfb5&oe=598CF867\")
The Smiths, probably ten years ago. Photo lifted from a social media posting about June. I’ll ask the photographer’s forgiveness.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
And while I spent less time with Mrs. Smith, she was just as important a figure in my life as her husband was. \u00a0And I don’t suispect I was the only one.<\/p>\n
\n
Junior high was a miserable time. \u00a0 I suspect it is for pretty much everyone that’s not an early bloomer – and I was certainly not that.<\/p>\n
The worst part? \u00a0Most of the things that had let me coast through elementary school – a way with words, a moderate facility with and enjoyment of wriring – had been turned into penal drudgery by years of needing to learn the\u00a0right\u00a0<\/em>way to do it. \u00a0I’d always loved writing – but between seventh and tenth grade, the only “writing” that happened was slogging through grammar, diagramming sentences, beating rules into our heads that I, honestly, didn’t\u00a0know<\/em>, but practiced just fine.<\/p>\n And then, in 11th grade, I finally got to take “Creative Writing”, with Mrs. Smith – a longtime English department colleague of my dad’s at the high school.<\/p>\n I came very close to writing “And suddenly, writing was\u00a0fun\u00a0<\/em>again!”.<\/p>\n It was. \u00a0But to leave it there would leave out half of the story. \u00a0 Because – l like her husband did with music – she taught us how good writing could be with a little bit of discipline.<\/p>\n And she did it with one enduring concept: \u00a0Engfish<\/strong>.<\/p>\n She described it as “English that is so full of soggy, rotten, cliched, pompous, pretentious dead weight that it stinks like a dead, rotting fish”. \u00a0 \u00a0Her stated mission was to teach us how to write without Engfish.<\/p>\n Her class included some writing exercises I still remember. \u00a0When our essays included any cliches, redundancy or pomposity, they’d come back marked with a penciled in fish, with “x” eyes and little vapor lines radiating upward. \u00a0That was the Engfish sign; you’d written something that stank, and needed to rewrite it.<\/p>\n The real acid test? \u00a0We’d turn in an essay; when she hit a phrase that made her lose internest – a big of Engfish, a soggy parenthetical, a diversion from the thesis –\u00a0she drew a line at that point and stopped reading. \u00a0She’d had it back to us to rewrite, as many times as it took for her to get through the essay with no Engfish. \u00a0\u00a0 Getting an essay past her without getting it sent back was one of the highlights of my junior year.<\/p>\n And that – learning how to write tight, to-the-point English – made writing not just fun, but truly absorbing, something I finally felt like I was in command of<\/em>.<\/p>\n I wasn’t, of course – it’d take my college writing prof, Dr. Blake (who also passed away in the past year and a half<\/a>) and years of practice to get there, and truth be told I still work at it, hard, every day. \u00a0It’s half the reason I plug away on this blog every weekday.<\/p>\n But ever since Mrs. Smith’s class, I’ve genuinely enjoyed it.<\/p>\n
\n