{"id":6097,"date":"2009-11-09T08:01:56","date_gmt":"2009-11-09T13:01:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=6097"},"modified":"2009-11-09T08:16:46","modified_gmt":"2009-11-09T13:16:46","slug":"kersten-the-shorter-every-liberals-critique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=6097","title":{"rendered":"Kersten: The Shorter &#8220;Every Liberal&#8217;s Critique&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There is no person in the Twin Cities media that inspires more unreasoning derangement than Katherine Kersten.\u00a0 When it was announced, several years ago, that she&#8217;d be joining the columnist staff at the <em>Strib<\/em>, the &#8220;journalist&#8221; community acted like management had proposed mandatory sodomy during work breaks.<\/p>\n<p>The Twin Cities&#8217; &#8220;journalist&#8221; community &#8211; which has tolerated all manner of abuses of contact, fact and selective omission and mangling of context with scarcely a peep &#8211; was concerned about the &#8220;journalistic integrity&#8221; of the Strib&#8217;s famously biased, fact-challenged editorial pages.<\/p>\n<p>But for these many years, I&#8217;ve been trying to press these people for details.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a typical exchange (*) from a local chat room frequented by media and near-media:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>[Writer A]:<\/strong> Katherine Kersten is teh suck.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg: <\/strong>Er, why do you say that?<\/p>\n<p><strong>[Writer A]:<\/strong> Have you read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.startribune.com\/local\/69411312.html\">her latest article in the Strib<\/a>?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Mitchberg: <\/strong>Yeah.\u00a0 What about it?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><strong>[Writer A]:<\/strong> She says that marriage is about having kids.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Mitchberg: <\/strong>Yeah.\u00a0 And&#8230;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><strong>[Writer A]:<\/strong> That And she says that people who don&#8217;t have kids should get married!<\/p>\n<p><strong>[Editor B]:<\/strong> Hah!\u00a0 She is teh crazee! LOLZ!\u00a0 Can I haz baybee?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg: <\/strong>Y Er, OK, both of you &#8211; I read the whole article.\u00a0 She says no such thing.\u00a0 Merely that the institution of marriage, traditionally and historically, throughout the world&#8217;s many, impossibly diverse cultures, is pretty universally about bringing men and women together to have children.\u00a0 And that the dissolution of this tradition has caused lots of problems in our society.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: Marriage is about <em>kids<\/em>?\u00a0 What?\u00a0 What about adults?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: You&#8217;ve never been married, have you?<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: No, and what does that have to do with it?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Er, never mind.\u00a0 Look, her main point is that marriage has always been how societies see to the upbringing and protection of children.\u00a0 It goes back to prehistory.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: Marriage was always about property.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Well, yeah, managing property, sure&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A]:<\/strong> No, because <em>women <\/em>were property.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Er, yeah.\u00a0 Put down the Womyn&#8217;s Studies textbook.\u00a0 There are a zillion societies on earth, and their treatment of women varied widely.\u00a0 In some, they were chattel.\u00a0 In others, they were second-class citizens at best. In sub-saharan Africa, most societies were matriarchal, and in much of Asia many societies had a stealth matriarchy.\u00a0 The treatment of women varies, historically, as widely as possible.\u00a0 Others were not a whole lot different than we see ourselves today.\u00a0 And some societies detested homosexuality with a homicidal passion, and others tolerated it with no major issues.\u00a0 The variations were almost infinite.\u00a0 And yet every single one of these societies had one thing in common; they were an institution in which man\/men came together with woman\/women to have, protect and raise children.\u00a0 What do you suppose the odds were, given the vast number of permutations in every other facet of male-female relationships, that pretty much every one would see marriage as a union of males and females to raise kids?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Hello?<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer<\/strong> A]: So people who don&#8217;t have kids shouldn&#8217;t marry?<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Editor B]:<\/strong> LOLZ!\u00a0 ShE Iz tha CrayXEE, Beeyotch!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Ed, yeah, got it.\u00a0 A, I didn&#8217;t say that.\u00a0 Could you show me where she does?\u00a0 Of course you can&#8217;t.\u00a0 Kersten neither prescribes nor proscribes.\u00a0 She merely points out that the institution of marriage exists for a reason, and that reason isn&#8217;t sharing employee benefits.\u00a0 Do I believe having kids is the only justification for marriage?\u00a0 I dunno.\u00a0 In the extremely unlikely event I marry again, I&#8217;m sure not having any more.\u00a0 I&#8217;ve done my time.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: So you agree with her.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Er, that&#8217;s kinda NOT what I said.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Producer C<\/strong>]: I would think as a conservative you&#8217;d want the Strib to hire a smart conservative to represent your side.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: Let&#8217;s stay, hypothetically, that Katherine Kersten really is a poor writer, and that, as you also say, everyone always knew it.\u00a0 Given the panic the Strib&#8217;s editorial board and columnists went into over hiring the putatively sub-par Kersten, do you honestly think they&#8217;d go and hire an <em>even better <\/em>conservative?\u00a0 I mean, even as things are and\/or putatively are, Kersten give them aneurysms.\u00a0 Can you imagine if they had a <em>bigger, badder <\/em>one in the newsroom?<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: So\u00a0 you think marriage is about kids.\u00a0 Isn&#8217;t it about adults?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitchberg<\/strong>: You may have perfectly summed up the crux of the Culture War.\u00a0 Some believe marriage is about benefits, status and adult concerns.\u00a0 Some of us believe it&#8217;s about raising kidst.\u00a0 It seems the twain will never meet.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Writer A<\/strong>]: This is futile.\u00a0 She is teh dumb.<\/p>\n<p>[<strong>Editor B<\/strong>]: And she a looser.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(*) Of course it&#8217;s satire.\u00a0 Any resemblance to conversations I&#8217;ve had with people in the Twin Cities media and sorta-media in past &#8211; especially in the past 48 hours &#8211; is purely coincidental.\u00a0 All celebrity written voices are impersonated &#8211; badly .<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Mitchberg: <\/strong>Yeah.\u00a0 And&#8230;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is no person in the Twin Cities media that inspires more unreasoning derangement than Katherine Kersten.\u00a0 When it was announced, several years ago, that she&#8217;d be joining the columnist staff at the Strib, the &#8220;journalist&#8221; community acted like management had proposed mandatory sodomy during work breaks. The Twin Cities&#8217; &#8220;journalist&#8221; community &#8211; which has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture-war","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6097"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6097\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6126,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6097\/revisions\/6126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}