\n<\/a><\/p>\n
Income:\u00a0<\/strong>Anderson received $11,805\u00a0in individual contributions:<\/p>\n Carlson got $10,407: So in terms of on-the-street fundraising from actual people, Anderson had a slight edge. \u00a0The edge is especially notable in terms of non-itemized contributions – smaller contributions from regular people that don’t need to be itemized on state reports; 86% of Andersons contributions were from the little guy; with Carlson,\u00a039% of his individual donations came from deep-pocketed suburban progressive\u00a0grand\u00e9es.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n In terms of funding from political parties: \u00a0Anderson got $500\u00a0from his local party unit- which, like most underfunded GOP party units in the city and the first ring of suburbs, no doubt had to dig really, really deep:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n The state GOP doesn’t spend a lot of money on special elections in the city and the first ring, while it’s still getting its financial house in order.<\/p>\n Carlson got $9,158.40 from the always well-heeled local party unit ($2,000), as well as cleaning out Lenczewski’s campaign account to the tune of $3,000, and a generous $4158.40 gift from the state DFL:<\/p>\n Carlson received $9,700\u00a0from various union PACs.<\/p>\n Carlson also got a public subsidy of $6897.04:<\/p>\n Anderson got no direct PAC\u00a0money, and he got no public subsidy.<\/p>\n Outgo:\u00a0<\/strong>Here’s the fun part; in total, Carlson spent $25,122.67<\/span><\/strong>:<\/p>\n![\"Calrson-Con-Indiv\"](\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Carlson-Con-Party.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n