{"id":57296,"date":"2016-01-28T12:00:59","date_gmt":"2016-01-28T18:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=57296"},"modified":"2016-01-27T20:38:31","modified_gmt":"2016-01-28T02:38:31","slug":"shot-in-the-dark-todays-discoveries-ten-years-ago","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=57296","title":{"rendered":"Shot In The Dark:  Today&#8217;s Insights, Ten Years Ago"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ten years ago on this blog, we were talking about the trend in advertising since probably the mid-nineties; if you look at an ad featuring a family, the man is probably depicted as a bumbling doughy cretin married to an improbably gorgeous woman who is (along with the kids, apparently including any boys that haven&#8217;t gotten married and had kids yet) inevitably smarter and more capable than him.<\/p>\n<p>And now, the people who study and talk about these things are&#8230;well, studying and talking about it. \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/men\/thinking-man\/advertisers-now-portray-men-the-way-they-portrayed-women-in-the\/\">At least in the UK<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div class=\"articleBodyText section\">\n<div class=\"article-body-text component \">\n<div class=\"component-content\">\n<p>What is more concerning is advertisers&#8217; and programme makers&#8217;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/men\/relationships\/10788208\/Why-do-advertisers-portray-men-as-idiots.html\">depiction of men as stupid<\/a>, subservient slaves to career-juggling\u00a0supermums \u2013 a trend that runs from the buffoonery of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/men\/relationships\/fatherhood\/11386904\/Sorry-Peppa-Pig-youre-just-not-movie-star-material.html\">Daddy Pig <\/a>to an endless tidal wave of cretinous TV ad dads.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"articleBodyText section\">\n<div class=\"article-body-text component \">\n<div class=\"component-content\">\n<p><span class=\"m_first-letter\">T<\/span>he Mintel research confirmed that 20 per cent of men think we are portrayed as<a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/men\/thinking-man\/10252230\/Am-I-hardwired-to-avoid-housework.html\"> incompetent about the house <\/a>in ads, and small wonder. In ad land \u2013 unlike the real world where men dominate computing and engineering \u2013 bumbling blokes can\u2019t even get a broadband connection and struggle with basic domestic appliances, while smarter women roll their eyes, then save the day.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, this means that, increasingly, men in adverts are prized for their looks, but ridiculed for their brains \u2013 which is precisely where women were in the 1950s and &#8217;60s.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the scary part &#8211; and the part that I&#8217;ve never seen anyone write about; \u00a0advertising doesn&#8217;t happen by accident. \u00a0Even in the\u00a0<em>Mad Men\u00a0<\/em>era, advertising was the product of rigorous audience research; it&#8217;s vastly moreso today.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;Dumb Husband&#8221; stereotype reigns supreme in ads for products where women might be reasonably assumed to be the primary consumers. \u00a0 Look at ads aimed at men; for the most part, women may well be eye candy, but the ad passes on little or no subtext about the womens&#8217; intelligence. \u00a0 \u00a0 And yet ads aimed at women are highly likely to portray men as idiots.<\/p>\n<p>Given that ads &#8211; much less trends in advertising &#8211; don&#8217;t happen by accident, this suggests that these ads are dominant because\u00a0<em>that&#8217;s what women think about their men. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And yet society wonders why young men are choosing video games over dating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ten years ago on this blog, we were talking about the trend in advertising since probably the mid-nineties; if you look at an ad featuring a family, the man is probably depicted as a bumbling doughy cretin married to an improbably gorgeous woman who is (along with the kids, apparently including any boys that haven&#8217;t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-men-and-women"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57296"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57298,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57296\/revisions\/57298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}