{"id":5363,"date":"2009-09-08T08:00:10","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T13:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=5363"},"modified":"2009-09-08T09:31:18","modified_gmt":"2009-09-08T14:31:18","slug":"editorial-what-is-obama-flap-teaching-our-kids-startribunecom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=5363","title":{"rendered":"Respect?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.startribune.com\/opinion\/editorials\/57388027.html?elr=KArksc8P:Pc:UthPacyPE7iUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr\">Sunday&#8217;s Strib editorial<\/a> actually ends with a modestly useful point:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Education has never been as strategically important to national well-being as it is today, as other nations move quickly to overtake this country in the knowledge-based economy of the future. Given that challenge, a simple speech on the value of education should not be a matter for partisan contention.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well, yeah.\u00a0 It should not be.\u00a0 Education has much, much bigger problems\u00a0than\u00a0a speech from\u00a0a President.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>And I personally don&#8217;t have a huge problem with the Presidents speech, in and of itself.\u00a0\u00a0The bureaucracy certainly overstepped in\u00a0its rah-rah approach to publicizing and curriculumizing the speech &#8211; it smacked\u00a0of personality cultism like a 2&#215;4 to the back of the head &#8220;smacks of&#8221; impact &#8211; and people do need to be vigilant about this kind of thing.<\/p>\n<p>But the Strib is shocked, shocked, to realize that Americans disagree about politics:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0But these are odd times. Unfortunately for our children, even a back-to-school welcome can further divide us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>True.\u00a0 But the address is hardly alone.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But just seven months into the Obama presidency, nothing is simple. The political lesson some seem intent on teaching our kids today is rooted in what appears to be a growing lack of respect for the office of the president. How very sad.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A &#8220;Growing lack of respect&#8221; for the office of president?<\/p>\n<p>What <em>did <\/em>the Strib &#8211; as reliably DFL-leaning a publication as exists &#8211; have to say about the endless, toxic disrespect that was paid to the previous President?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Bear in mind that disagreeing with policy isn&#8217;t direspectful &#8211; conservatives opposed Bush&#8217;s spending, quaint as it seems today.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This after eight years of running columns that referred to President Bush as &#8220;the occupant&#8221;; eight years of Garrison Keillor&#8217;s sniffing down his nose over Bush&#8217;s accent with nary a word about policy; eight years of Susan Lenfestey&#8217;s paranoid, hate-drenched Bush derangement.<\/p>\n<p>Yeah, Strib.\u00a0 Your concern for respect for the office is touching.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It ought to give Americans pause about the toll of excessive partisanship when the president is faulted for planning to urge the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren to learn their lessons. On Tuesday, the first day of school for many Americans, the president&#8217;s brief address should be a valuable reminder that students serve their country as well as themselves when they succeed academically. That message deserves a top-level spokesman.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And the notion of &#8220;respect for the office&#8221; deserves a spokesman who isn&#8217;t marinading in cynical hypocrisy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sunday&#8217;s Strib editorial actually ends with a modestly useful point: Education has never been as strategically important to national well-being as it is today, as other nations move quickly to overtake this country in the knowledge-based economy of the future. Given that challenge, a simple speech on the value of education should not be a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}