{"id":5334,"date":"2009-09-01T08:01:42","date_gmt":"2009-09-01T13:01:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=5334"},"modified":"2009-09-01T08:01:42","modified_gmt":"2009-09-01T13:01:42","slug":"open","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=5334","title":{"rendered":"Open"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back during the concealed carry debate in Minnesota, I can&#8217;t count the number of casually anti-reform people &#8211; including one DFL lobbyist\/activist type who, while not an elected official, exerts a fairly hefty influence over politics in the Twin Cities &#8211; that I talked to who asked &#8220;why not require people to carry openly?\u00a0 I mean, why not show people that you&#8217;re carrying?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Which of course shows how screechingly ill-informed most anti-concealed carry activists are; the Minnesota Personal Protection Act allows people to carry openly.<\/p>\n<p>But leaving aside the fact that <em>requiring<\/em> open carry would have the effect of tipping violent criminals off as to who was armed, most people who have permits don&#8217;t carry openly for the simple reason that &#8220;Gun&#8221; is a pretty powerful message.\u00a0 In a generally-disarmed place like the Twin Cities, openly carrying a gun &#8211; completely legally &#8211; would be a little like walking around naked; it could be completely innocent, but at the very least it&#8217;d\u00a0tend to dominate the conversation, and at the most could get people pretty upset.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>At this year&#8217;s annual Gun Rights picnic at the Harriett Bandshell, where dozens of utterly law-abiding citizens stood, ate and kibitzed, many of us carrying permitted firearms, a bystander was heard sputtering into a cell phone demanding a police response.\u00a0 Now, it was a legal picnic full of legal people doing a legal activity, and someone had taken the liberty of telling the police what was going on, so nothing happened.\u00a0 But as a general rule, keeping guns out the way among crowds that might not necessarily be with the good guys is considered tactful.\u00a0 At least.<\/p>\n<p>Just because you <em>can <\/em>openly carry your firearm doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a good idea.<\/p>\n<p>Now, when you mix guns and politics?\u00a0 The messages are even more pronounced.\u00a0 The symbolism gets through to even SEIU members.<\/p>\n<p>Make no mistake about it; government <em>needs <\/em>to know that the people do in fact have the final veto, should they get genuinely out of line &#8211; suspending the Constitution, abrogating democracy, descending into genuine tyranny.\u00a0 And the government <em>should <\/em>know that each and every one of us gun-owning citizens is not going to be giving up our Second Amendment rights without a fight &#8211; and that fight will be rhetorical and political, God willing, as long as we <em>do <\/em>have a functioning democracy.<\/p>\n<p>But at a town hall meeting? Oh, I get the idea &#8211; but it&#8217;s a bad plan.\u00a0 While you may be trying to express &#8220;Don&#8217;t Tread On Me&#8221;, there are those &#8211; mostly, but not entirely, from the pants-wetting class &#8211; who will take it as &#8220;I&#8217;m Treading On You&#8221;.\u00a0 Which is the last impression one wants to leave people with in a civil society.<\/p>\n<p>So while I get the idea, the fact is that Obama hasn&#8217;t suspended the constitution.\u00a0 Oh, he and his Chicago-like administration are playing fast and loose with a lot of our rights, and they need watching.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>When when you&#8217;re talking town hall meetings &#8211;\u00a0notwithstanding the fact that\u00a0when congresspeople and the President are involved are usually really just decorative window-dressing when it comes to &#8220;participatory democracy&#8221; &#8211; leave the guns at home.\u00a0 Even <em>if <\/em>you&#8217;re legal (as all the people in the incidents two weeks ago were).<\/p>\n<p>We need to force the President and his dupes to stay on subject.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back during the concealed carry debate in Minnesota, I can&#8217;t count the number of casually anti-reform people &#8211; including one DFL lobbyist\/activist type who, while not an elected official, exerts a fairly hefty influence over politics in the Twin Cities &#8211; that I talked to who asked &#8220;why not require people to carry openly?\u00a0 I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5334\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}