{"id":4869,"date":"2009-06-02T06:36:32","date_gmt":"2009-06-02T11:36:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4869"},"modified":"2009-06-02T06:36:32","modified_gmt":"2009-06-02T11:36:32","slug":"the-castratus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4869","title":{"rendered":"The Castratus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most irritating conceits of feminism run amok is that women are smarter\/more capable\/more worthy\/just-plain-<em>better<\/em> than men.<\/p>\n<p>Usually you get it in an offhanded jape from the not-overly-bright; a comic&#8217;s &#8220;ladies, we <em>know <\/em>you&#8217;re smarter than us&#8221; &#8211; harmless stuff.<\/p>\n<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t go to far as to say <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/commentisfree\/2009\/jun\/01\/charlie-brooker-women-men-power\">Charlie Brooker&#8217;s piece in the the <em>Guardian<\/em><\/a> is &#8220;harmful&#8221; as observe that it explains a lot about a certain part of the left.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Women &#8211; why aren&#8217;t you running the world yet? Frankly I&#8217;m disappointed in you. Men are still far too dominant for their own good, and consequently we&#8217;ve made a testosterone-sodden pig&#8217;s ear of just about everything: politics, the economy, religion, the environment &#8230; you name it, it&#8217;s in a gigantic man-wrought mess. The world&#8217;s been one big d***-swinging contest, and we&#8217;ve caught our collective glans in a nearby desk fan. By rights we should be squealing for your help, but we&#8217;re not, because we&#8217;re too damn stupid and too damn proud. We swagger convincingly, and that&#8217;s about it. And swaggering&#8217;s fine for scraping by in primitive times, but the world we&#8217;ve built is altogether more complex now. We&#8217;ve got stock exchanges and nuclear warheads. It&#8217;s too easy to swagger your way into big trouble without even realising. Well, we&#8217;ve had our turn. It&#8217;s time for the Rise of the Ladies.We don&#8217;t need a few women in conspicuous positions of power scattered here and there &#8211; we need a 10-year prohibition on all forms of male power.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve read this same piece a few countless times, of course; it wends its way through the usual bilge; men are simple and singleminded, the world would be better if men lay about like pigs, which is (couldn&#8217;t see this coming) their true nature, bla bla bla, along with the inevitable:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Seriously: a decade in which men don&#8217;t get to control anything, from the remote control upwards. Imagine the consequences. For one thing, there would be an instant and massive reduction in armed conflict around the globe.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, women in power in major countries seem to inevitably end up fighting wars&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;but let&#8217;s not confuse the issue with actual history and stuff.<\/p>\n<p>I read this kind of tripe, and I&#8217;m dragged back to something I asked a few years back:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Who have been the great rulers of matriarchal societies?\u00a0\u00a0 Who knows?<\/p>\n<p>The theory I\u2019ve heard &#8211; and I can\u2019t remember when or from whom, sorry &#8211; is that matriarchal societies tend to be more inward-focused; it\u2019s in matriarchal socities that it\u2019s believed that \u201cit takes a village to raise a child\u201d; according to the theory, a matriarchal society behaves more or less like a group of girls will act; verbal, group-oriented, alternately supportive and undercutting.<\/p>\n<p>Patriarchal societies, says the theory, act like boys; outward facing, rules-based, individualistic.<\/p>\n<p>Most societies, of course, mix the two in some way or another, more or less.\u00a0 And when two societies collide in conflict, it\u2019s usually the patriarchal one that prevails (see:\u00a0 the spread of intensely patriarchal Islam across heavily-matriarchal Africa).<\/p>\n<p>Again &#8211; as I noted above, the only large, significant society in all of history that has seriously addressed the notion of equity among races, beliefs and genders\u00a0is the patriarchal, Judeo-Christian western civilization.<\/p>\n<p>Question:\u00a0 If the Judeo-Christian West were a matriarchal society, would it have developed into small-l liberal democracies?\u00a0 Or would they be recognizable to us today?\u00a0 Would they be viable?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As re Mr. Brooker, I&#8217;m casting pearls before misandric swine.\u00a0 But the question has fascinated me for years: what\u00a0 <em>would <\/em>a matriarchal west look like?\u00a0 And I don&#8217;t mean the idealized fantasy that the likes of Brooker and some of the identity feminists give us, where female rule brings universal peace and healthcare and calm rationality.<\/p>\n<p>Would <em>would <\/em>a matriarchal west look like?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most irritating conceits of feminism run amok is that women are smarter\/more capable\/more worthy\/just-plain-better than men. Usually you get it in an offhanded jape from the not-overly-bright; a comic&#8217;s &#8220;ladies, we know you&#8217;re smarter than us&#8221; &#8211; harmless stuff. And I wouldn&#8217;t go to far as to say Charlie Brooker&#8217;s piece in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-men-and-women"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}