{"id":47107,"date":"2014-09-15T12:00:03","date_gmt":"2014-09-15T17:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=47107"},"modified":"2014-09-15T12:12:54","modified_gmt":"2014-09-15T17:12:54","slug":"noh8-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=47107","title":{"rendered":"NoH8!"},"content":{"rendered":"

When gay marriage activists sold the idea of same-sex marriage, their key points (other than the “if you disagree you are teh bigot!” that most of the lower-information supporters prattled endlessly)\u00a0were:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The idea that marriage is purely about raising children is obsolete – people who don’t intend to, or can’t, have children, are married all the time, even in churches.\u00a0<\/li>\n
  2. With the idea of procreation left out of the equation, why, really, shouldn’t two people who love each other be able to be married?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    This, of course, introduced some new questions; if, indeed, “love” is the basis for marriage, why can’t three or more people love<\/em> each other enough to get married, by that same token?\u00a0<\/p>\n

    There was one other case I’ve been wondering about for the past few years; what kind of “love” do we mean, here?\u00a0<\/p>\n

    Who Wrote The Book Of Love?<\/strong>:\u00a0 There are different kinds of love; the Bible\u00a0breaks “love” down into three categories:<\/p>\n