![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/Facts-Header.jpg\" "\\"Facts-Header\\"")
<\/a><\/p>\n“The Alliance for a Better Minnesota – which, as most MPR listeners are unaware, is essentially a political PR firm funded by wealthy Democrats, government employee unions, and Governor Dayton’s ex-wife Alita Messinger, has been running a well-funded advertising and social-media campaign for the past few electoral cycles labeling their Republican opposition, jointly and severally, as “Wrong for Minnesota”<\/p>\n
“What does this mean?\u00a0 And is the claim accurate?”<\/p>\n
“The Evidence:\u00a0 <\/strong>While one can expect any politician and their supporters to reflexively label their opposition as “wrong” – moreso in today’s polarized climate than ever – the terms “right” and “wrong” are themselves terms with deeply subjective meanings.\u00a0 The meanings of the terms are, in fact, more tied to philosophy than politics”<\/p>\n “Poligraph consulted leading philosophers from all major worldviews – from structuralists to neo-Dadaists, and even a few with tendencies toward nihilism – and while there was no agreement on an absolute definition of “right” or “wrong”, much less one applicable to Minnesota, and Minnesota politics specifically, the general consensus was that the term “wrong” is intrinsically tied to the perception of both the “speaker” and the “listener” or consumer of the statement.”<\/p>\n “However, ‘the idea that one speaker could judge something ‘wrong’ for an entire state of 5.5 million independent agents, just on their say-so, is just plain bizarre”, according to a consensus statement signed by every single philosopher we consulted.”<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/publicradio1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com\/capitol-view\/files\/2013\/11\/poligraph-misleading.gif\")
<\/a><\/p>\n