The second-biggest problem this nation faces today – behind the fact that our financial system, left to run the way it is today, is going to crash sooner than later – is the fact that too much of our government operates outside the law.<\/p>\n
Of course, that fact grabs headlines when Obama’s administration tramples the law to oppress conservative groups – and by “headlines”, we mean “not in the mainstream media”, but headlines nonetheless.<\/p>\n
It even gets notice on\u00a0the retail level\u00a0when government’s agents – the cops – make up the law as they go along<\/a>.<\/p>\n But in the long term, it may be most toxic when the “justice” system decides it can operate outside the law.\u00a0 Whether it’s a corrupt, pettifogging Mike Nifong bending the rules to help his re-election bid…<\/p>\n …or\u00a0a piece of garbage in a judge costune who decides the law is what she says it is:<\/a><\/p>\n A judge has ordered Matthew Hindes to appear in court or face contempt, despite the fact that he’s out at sea and there’s a federal law meant to help those who are deployed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Sailor Hindes already won custody of his daughter – four years ago<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0Now he’s a crewman on, concidentally,\u00a0the USS Michigan<\/em> ,a ballistic missile submarine.<\/p>\n The Serviceman’s Civil Relief Act (SCRA) was designed to protect servicepeople from being ambushed by legal actions (foreclosures, lawsuits, and yes, custody battles) while they’re deployed and defending the country, frequently in situations where keeping focus on their jobs is a matter of life or death for them and – in the case of a submarine crew – 150 other men.\u00a0\u00a0 By law, judges are to stay all actions for a minimum of 90 days while servicepeople carry out their duty to this country.<\/p>\n But Hindes’ ex-wife filed a motion in their apparently ongoing custody battle.\u00a0 And – SCRA notwithstanding – the judge has declared herself above the law, and is demanding that Hindes crap out a miracle:<\/p>\n But circuit court judge Margaret Noe in Michigan denied that protection for Hindes. The Daily Telegram quotes the judge, “If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.” But sailor Hindes argues the child was taken from the ex-wife four years ago for neglect.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Let’s not mince words:\u00a0 Judge Noe is a martinet, and a pig, and a “human” only in the strictest biological sense of the term.\u00a0 She is unfit to walk on the same street as Hindes, much less suspend the law in regard to his case. \u00a0 She is a piece of animal offal with two legs and a law degree.<\/p>\n Military lawyers are now joining the effort to get a delay in the case. In the meantime Hindes remains deployed serving his country.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I hope those military lawyers start <\/em>with tossing Noe’s actions thus far.\u00a0 And then impeach “her”\u00a0from the bench.\u00a0 And then clap her in the stocks to be pelted with garbage and jeers,\u00a0especially from other serving servicepeople, not to mention the rare custodial father.\u00a0\u00a0Then it’d be nice to\u00a0deport her to North Korea, where she belongs and into whose ruling class she\u00a0would likely fit nicely, at least ideologically.\u00a0 And I hope they film the whole thing, to show it to any other petty government functionary who\u00a0tries to operate like the law is their personal byotch.<\/p>\n That’d be merciful.\u00a0 “Judge” Noe should be happy I’m not this nation’s absolute ruler. \u00a0Then, things would get nasty.<\/p>\n Hindes’ supporters have Facebook pages here\u00a0<\/a>and\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The second-biggest problem this nation faces today – behind the fact that our financial system, left to run the way it is today, is going to crash sooner than later – is the fact that too much of our government operates outside the law. Of course, that fact grabs headlines when Obama’s administration tramples the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45142"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45195,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45142\/revisions\/45195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}