{"id":4506,"date":"2009-04-03T07:30:53","date_gmt":"2009-04-03T12:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4506"},"modified":"2009-11-20T15:35:18","modified_gmt":"2009-11-20T20:35:18","slug":"what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-the-mngop-part-v-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4506","title":{"rendered":"What The Hell Is Wrong With The MNGOP: Part V"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I noted that, from an activist&#8217;s perspective, the MNGOP seems to want to centralize control of its message &#8211; keeping activists and bloggers it doesn&#8217;t control at arms length &#8211; but at the same time, that it doesn&#8217;t seem to know what its&#8217; message <em>is.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a real problem.\u00a0 It&#8217;s easy for Democrats to get on message; most people learned the key points of Democratic\/Liberal philosophy in kindergarten; &#8220;share and share alike!\u00a0Take your fair share! Everyone is exactly the same (except your teachers, of course)!&#8221;.\u00a0 Take these simple tropes, tack on the element of state force to get compliance, and you basically have the DFL message; &#8220;Share what we think we need, or we&#8217;ll take what we want&#8221;.\u00a0 They word it more nicely, but that&#8217;s really about it.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s more complicated when you&#8217;re right of center; many of the tenets of center-right thought are harder, almost counterintuitive, to the things we were tought when we were five years old; merit, tough love, rights don&#8217;t impinge other rights, enumerated powers, individual responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>And even with that, there are <em>so many <\/em>flavors of thought in the GOP:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The Ron Paul crowd<\/strong> &#8211; basically Libertarians who saw a major party ripe for the picking.\u00a0 They are largely hardcore civil libertarians, largely without the faintest interest in social conservative issues.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evangelicals<\/strong> &#8211; largely social conservatives; they focus (some of them almost to exclusion) on issues like abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research; I&#8217;ve met not a few that were hard-core pro-lifers who were wobbly on Second Amendment and even fiscal issues (I&#8217;m talking to you, Mike Huckabee).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Culture Conservatives <\/strong>&#8211; Similar to the Evangelicals, although not always motivated by faith; immigration, gay marriage and the near reaches of social policy motivate them.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fiscal Hawks<\/strong> &#8211; These range from Center of the American Experiment policy wonks to Jason Lewis&#8217; hordes of tax hawks.\u00a0 Many are social conservatives, but it&#8217;s no lock.<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;Reagan&#8221; Democrats<\/strong>\u00a0 &#8211; There are not a few moderate DFLers &#8211; union members, blue-collar guys and gals, veterans &#8211; who are nauseated by some combination of Dems&#8217; policies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Homesteaders <\/strong>&#8211; That&#8217;s my term for the small, but growing, groups of black Republicans who realize the DFL represents a tragic quackery on education and welfare, and Hispanics who are tired of having their conservative social beliefs piddled on,\u00a0Asians who recognize the DFL&#8217;s threat to free enterprise, African immigrants who&#8217;ve already lived through third-world hell and don&#8217;t want to see Minnesota even start to flirt with more of the same, and even a few Gay conservatives who are tired of being treated as ripe voting sucks by a party that expects their votes in exchange for not a helluva lot but rhetoric in return.<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;Moderates&#8221; <\/strong>&#8211; These people used to control the party; the likes of Lori Sturdevant and Nick Coleman pine for the days when Arne Carlson and Dave Durenberger were the voices of the MNGOP.\u00a0 They[&#8216;re still out there; the Override Six battle showed they&#8217;re still alive,well, and &#8211; this is important &#8211; a non-trivial force in the party.<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;Pragmatists&#8221;\u00a0 <\/strong>&#8211; Moderate?\u00a0 Conservative?\u00a0 Fiscal Hawk?\u00a0 Opportunist?\u00a0 They may be a minority in your BPOU caucus, but they&#8217;re pretty prominent in the party leadership and, lest we forget, the governor&#8217;s mansion.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Security Voters <\/strong>&#8211; Maybe they remember the joke that was the Democratic Party during the Cold War; maybe they recall the way the Dems giggled and skipped away as the Communists inflicted epic mass murder on Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia; maybe they&#8217;re sick of Minnesota&#8217;s catch and release criminal justice system; maybe they still see the Twin Towers burning when they go to the polls.\u00a0 Whatever; they are Republicans because they see that the Dems are\u00a0whores on the battlefieldand generals in the bedroom when it comes to security, at home and abroad.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Mitch Berg Bloc<\/strong> &#8211; This last bloc, of indeterminate size (from one to thousands; nobody knows for sure) represents people who are fiscal hawks, social libertarians, personal Christians, legal Constitutionalists and who are pragmatic yet absolutist on security.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>To make it challenging, remember; without any of these blocs (Homesteaders and the Mitch Bergs might be expendable, sorta), the party will have a <em>very <\/em>hard time winning.\u00a0 And that means <em>any<\/em> bloc; the RINOs, damn the luck, are as important as the fiscal hawks.<br \/>\nSo what happens when you put a Taxpayers&#8217; League wonk, a MCCL activist and Ron Paul supporter in a room?<\/p>\n<p>Currently, not much; the pro-lifer calls the other two RINOs on social issues; the wonk calls his roommates RINOs on fiscal issues, and the Paulbot bags on the others&#8217; commitment to small government and liberty.<\/p>\n<p>And they&#8217;re all wrong.\u00a0 And they&#8217;re all right.\u00a0 And it&#8217;s no way to run a party, either way.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>In the past, I&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=2027\">used<\/a> the metaphor of the &#8220;Tug of War&#8221; to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=2046\">describe my beliefs<\/a> about partisan politics.\u00a0 We live in a pluralistic society; nobody is ever going to convince <em>everyone <\/em>to believe as they do, to &#8220;pull the other side into the mud pit&#8221;, to complete the metaphor; the best they can hope for is to convince as many people as possible to join their team to &#8220;pull the rope&#8221; for their particular issue as far as possible in the direction they want.\u00a0 Which doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean &#8220;compromise right out of the gate&#8221;; indeed, it means &#8220;pull like hell&#8221; &#8211; to a point.<\/p>\n<p>As a Reagan Conservative &#8211; a center-right fiscal conservative and social libertarian &#8211; I&#8217;ve set my stake in the ground.\u00a0 I wrote the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/looktruenorth.com\/about-us.html\">True North Manifesto<\/a>&#8221; almost two years ago &#8211; and with its six key pillars\u00a0(Liberty, Prosperity, Security, Limited Government, Culture, Family) it was a pretty decent summation of center-right conservatism as I&#8217;ve seen if I say so myself (and I say so myself).\u00a0 Those are the six ropes I haul on, and try to convince others to join me in pulling for.<\/p>\n<p>But when you run a genuine big tent party, there are many, many of these tugs of war &#8211; many of them within the party itself.\u00a0 What does &#8220;limited government&#8221; mean to Arne Carlson?\u00a0 What is &#8220;Security&#8221; to a Hispanic conservative, a 9\/11 Democrat, or a Ron Paul supporter?<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, to get <em>anything <\/em>of this implemented into policy, you have to win elections, no matter what bloc you belong to.\u00a0 And with the Minnesota GOP <em>this <\/em>fragmented, that looks dicey.\u00a0 But if the GOP isn&#8217;t in power, it&#8217;s for sure that the DFL is not going to stand for <em>anything <\/em>we believe in, whether fiscal sanity or law and order or the sanctity of human life.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s a party to do?<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>My friend Andy Applikowki at the blog <em>Residual Forces<\/em>\u00a0 &#8211; one of my colleagues on the ruling junta at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.looktruenorth.com\"><em>True North<\/em><\/a><em> &#8211; <\/em>put it well at an editorial meeting a few months back.\u00a0 Paraphrasing, he said we need, as\u00a0a party, to put aside the things we disagree on to fight for the things we <em>do <\/em>agree on.<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s right, of course.\u00a0 If you oppose abortion, who is more likely to return your call when she&#8217;s in office &#8211; a Republican for whom it&#8217;s a non-issue, or a Democrat for whom it&#8217;s a social sacrament?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a no-brainer; no GOP power, no progress on the things <em>any <\/em>of us, Paulbots and MCCLers and Jason Lewis fans and, by the way, me, believe in.<\/p>\n<p>So what do all Republicans, from all corners of the party and every place in between, agree on, <em>on a statewide level <\/em>(meaning &#8220;things that state elected officials will ever have to deal with), that we can turn into a winning message?<\/p>\n<p>Hint:\u00a0 They all tie in with &#8220;Freedom&#8221; at the root of it all.\u00a0 But &#8220;Freedom&#8221; is an ephemeral concept &#8211; a great, beautiful one that hundreds of thousands of our forefathers (and brothers and sisters, really) died to protect.\u00a0 But one of the great political aphorisms is &#8220;it&#8217;s the economy, stupid&#8221;; people think in terms of tangible things that hit them where they live, day in, day out.<\/p>\n<p>And for the Republican voter, and (more importantly) the non-affiliated voter who can be persuaded, there are three of these issues I&#8217;m going to suggest:<\/p>\n<p>Prosperity.<\/p>\n<p>Education.<\/p>\n<p>Security.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll address each of these &#8211;\u00a0and why each gives the voter a\u00a0<em>reason <\/em>to vote Republican, and why Republicans <em>do <\/em>have to agree on these &#8211;\u00a0starting Monday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I noted that, from an activist&#8217;s perspective, the MNGOP seems to want to centralize control of its message &#8211; keeping activists and bloggers it doesn&#8217;t control at arms length &#8211; but at the same time, that it doesn&#8217;t seem to know what its&#8217; message is. It&#8217;s a real problem.\u00a0 It&#8217;s easy for Democrats to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72,101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mngop","category-what-the-hell"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6523,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4506\/revisions\/6523"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}