{"id":44681,"date":"2014-06-05T12:00:48","date_gmt":"2014-06-05T17:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=44681"},"modified":"2014-06-05T08:20:58","modified_gmt":"2014-06-05T13:20:58","slug":"anti-gun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=44681","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Anti-Gun&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One question I get from GOP activists, in the run-up and especially since the convention, is &#8220;Isn&#8217;t Mike McFadden anti-gun?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, if the GOP&#8217;s endorsed Senate candidate has taken criticism for anything, it&#8217;s being a little enigmatic on some of his answers to policy questions. \u00a0That is, obviously, going to have to change soon. \u00a0And I suspect it will.<\/p>\n<p>But if there&#8217;s one issue where McFadden&#8217;s been scrutinized pretty carefully, it&#8217;s guns. \u00a0And the fact is this: \u00a0McFadden supported the &#8220;gun show background check&#8221;. \u00a0And let&#8217;s be honest; a lot of people did, including a lot of pro-gun people who hadn&#8217;t thought through all the ramifications (it&#8217;d be a <em>de facto<\/em> gun registry). \u00a0And I&#8217;m going to guess it was an idea that tested out well in focus groups with mixed bags of voters who also didn&#8217;t know the issue all that well.<\/p>\n<p>But then McFadden ran up against Minnesota&#8217;s shooters &#8211; the single best-organized mass of activists in Minnesota. \u00a0And the shooters howled. \u00a0And McFadden has spent the past three months walking back the gun-show registration idea.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond that, McFadden had nothing objectionable to say (and yes, &#8220;what he says&#8221; is what we have to go by, since he has no voting record).<\/p>\n<p>So I have two responses:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flip?<\/strong>: \u00a0Has McFadden flipped on gun-show background checks? \u00a0Hopefully. \u00a0He&#8217;s certainly been vocal about not being anti-Second-Amendment at his speeches &#8211; it was pretty much the first item on the agenda of his speeches I heard in March and April. \u00a0I have no problem with people flipping, by the way, provided they flip in the right direction. \u00a0He rates some further scrutiny &#8211; gotta keep politicians honest &#8211; but I think we&#8217;ve got the basis for some optimism.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Perspective<\/strong>: \u00a0Let&#8217;s say for a moment that McFadden is generally pro-gun, with a few minor warts. \u00a0Now, I know &#8220;incrementalism&#8221; is a dirty word for some of you out there, but a Senator who generally supports the Second Amendment, even with a few flash-points of disagreement, will be an improvement at the national level over Al Franken, who only wants &#8220;Organizing for America&#8221; to be armed.<\/p>\n<p>Discuss.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One question I get from GOP activists, in the run-up and especially since the convention, is &#8220;Isn&#8217;t Mike McFadden anti-gun?&#8221; Now, if the GOP&#8217;s endorsed Senate candidate has taken criticism for anything, it&#8217;s being a little enigmatic on some of his answers to policy questions. \u00a0That is, obviously, going to have to change soon. \u00a0And [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[80,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-senator-franken","category-victim-disarmament"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44681"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44681\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44683,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44681\/revisions\/44683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}