{"id":444,"date":"2007-02-12T07:54:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-12T13:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/index.php\/2007\/02\/12\/whose-scale\/"},"modified":"2007-02-12T07:57:20","modified_gmt":"2007-02-12T13:57:20","slug":"whose-scale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=444","title":{"rendered":"Whose Scale?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Strib&#8217;s editorial this morning clucks about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.startribune.com\/561\/story\/993039.html\">way Saint Paul&#8217;s University Avenue strip <\/a>&#8211; one of the most successful areas in Minnesota, both in terms of big commerce (Midway Center, with its row of big-box retailers) and smaller enterprise (the two miles of Asian businesses that turned the Avenue, over a couple of decades, from a wretched decayed toilet to a generally decent place) is scaled.<\/p>\n<p>They have a <span style=\"font-style: italic\">plan, <\/span>you see:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 40px\">The plan, prepared by Urban Strategies of Toronto after months of discussions with residents, is extraordinary. It depicts clearly the challenges St. Paul faces in remaking one of Americas ugliest urban strips in a way that doesnt chase away immigrant shops or low-income residents but adds vitality, beauty, safety and convenience. The plan lists 90 initiatives, including the infilling of big-box parking lots with sidewalk-oriented businesses &#8212; a gradual transition from suburban to urban form. &#8220;The result will be stronger businesses, more vibrant neighborhoods and a more beautiful urban place,&#8221; the plan proclaims.<\/p>\n<p>One of the options they <span style=\"font-style: italic\">don&#8217;t <\/span>list, unfortunately, is &#8220;changing the type of transit chosen for the strip&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The Met Council has committed Saint Paul to &#8220;light rail&#8221; for the Central Corridor &#8211; the same big, fast trains used on the Ventura Trolley.  This option will require University &#8211; Saint Paul&#8217;s backbone (forget about I94) to be torn apart for the better part of a decade.<\/p>\n<p>Leave aside the advisability of rail transit in a relatively low-density city like Saint Paul (I&#8217;m not dogmatically anti-transit, but the Met Council&#8217;s choices in this area give one plenty of room to be agnostic about the issue and still have plenty to rage against) for a moment; the Met Council had several options that would have done a <span style=\"font-style: italic\">vastly <\/span>better job of connecting the downtowns <span style=\"font-style: italic\">and <\/span>not gutted the middle of Saint Paul:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Build a Ventura-Trolley-style light rail line along existing rail rights of way along the tangle of tracks already connecting the two downtowns &#8211; between Energy Park\/Pierce Butler and Como Avenues &#8211; connected to the rest of the area by feeder buses.  This would combine the (relative) speed of light rail, the flexibility of buses, <span style=\"font-style: italic\">and <\/span>not tear the hell out of the Midway, <span style=\"font-style: italic\">and <\/span>save a zillion dollars by using existing rights of way.<\/li>\n<li>Use a lower-impact form of rail &#8211; &#8220;Streetcars&#8221; instead of &#8220;light rail&#8221;, something more like a bus on rails, only with vastly higher capacity and its own right of way.  It&#8217;d disrupt the street vastly less, be a huge improvement over University&#8217;s teeming bus lines, and (this is big) encourage the sort of smaller-scale, more organic development that the editors purport to want.  Streetcars wouldn&#8217;t require big, elaborate, expensive, disruptive stations, as does the Ventura Trolley &#8211; the sort of things that disrupt neighborhoods, and also shimmy urban planners into trying to change the fundamental character of the areas around the stations &#8211; as has happened around the Ventura Trolley.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Of course, I read things like this&#8230;:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 40px\">On that front, Minneapolis has moved well ahead of St. Paul in anticipating light rail along its portion of the avenue. Discussions with the Prospect Park neighborhood and university officials have produced detailed plans and rezoning for the station area around 29th Street SE., which promises to be the most dynamic stop along the line.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 40px\">Here, in close proximity, will be the quiet, leafy Prospect Park neighborhood on one side, and on the other a new Gophers football stadium, a new bioscience campus, a commuter rail line, the universitys inter-campus bus transitway and space for private enterprise to build bioscience laboratories and perhaps 1,000 new homes. One idea is to make this an area attractive to alumni, who might like to retire near campus on an LRT line. Already, the plan, offered by consultant Daniel Cornejo, includes an urban-scale grocery store as part of the rail station.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, they want the sort of cataclysmic neighborhood-shaping that accompanies the disruption caused by the sort of construction they support.<\/p>\n<p>Sorry, Strib.  I like the city I live in just fine.  Most of us who live here voluntarily do.  Go and shape your own city in your image.<\/p>\n<p>Because you&#8217;ve done such a fine job in Minneapolis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Strib&#8217;s editorial this morning clucks about the way Saint Paul&#8217;s University Avenue strip &#8211; one of the most successful areas in Minnesota, both in terms of big commerce (Midway Center, with its row of big-box retailers) and smaller enterprise (the two miles of Asian businesses that turned the Avenue, over a couple of decades, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-st-paul"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}